Or trade down and get a point, if he’s too high at #8.

The Bucks’ biggest problem is and recently always has been at the 3 spot. That’s where they need to focus.

Also, I do not think that the Bulls will be instantly upgraded if they take Beasley or Rose. In terms of talent, yes, but in terms of team success, I don’t think either player can fix the situation by themselves. Think about it; you still have to deal with Kirk Heinrich, Larry Hughes, Ben Gordon, Luol Deng, Tyrus Thomas, Drew Gooden, Thabo Sefolosha, Andres Nocioni…all of whom are ‘good’ players but just haven’t met success. Adding another good player to this mix isn’t going to fix Chicago.

What are you guys going to do draft the foreign guy.

But the Bulls’ core has had success previously (when they were even younger in fact), so it’s not like that group can’t compete. Add a future star like Beasley or Rose plus a good coach and you’re definitely in the playoff mix next year and set up for a long time.

Small forward is definitely a bigger need on paper, but with Mo, Redd and Villanueva all very available this summer there’s also a good chance we can fill that need via trade. I’m intrigued by Gallinari and Randolph but they both have a lot of questions too. And I think in a general sense that PG is definitely a more important position than SF.

We have lots of talent on the roster right now at PG, but who knows how long Mo Williams will be around. I like Westbrook a lot and he seems to be the type of hard-nosed, two-way player that Hammond and Skiles liked in Detroit and Chicago. Plus while Westbrook’s not a “pure” PG right now, both Hammond and Skiles have had success with Billups and Hinrich, two bigger PGs who also aren’t really pass-first types. Not that Westbrook can be those guys off the bat, but I think it’s something to consider.

And so the fun begins…

The bucks should target Gallinari but if they cant get him i like the look of Randolph