Brew Hoop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Evaluating the Orlando Magic After 10 Games Bar-right-arrows



A Trade Idea with Portland

Hi Buck fans.  I am a long time Blazers fan and also a huge fan of Rudy Fernandez.  He is a dynamic shooting guard from Spain.  I have spent the last two years watching coach Nate McMillan play inferior point guards in front of Sergio Rodriguez. 

Sergio's development has been hindered by Nate's poor coaching and inability to change.  I would hate to see the same thing happen to Rudy.  I would much rather him go to a team where he can thrive and get playing time.  Let's face it, he's not going to get any PT behind Brandon Roy.  I came up with a trade with you guys and wondered if you folks think it is fair.

Portland trades: Rudy Fernandez, Joel Przybilla, and Channing Frye

Milwaukee trades: Dan Gadzuric and Yi Jianlian

It works on the ESPN Trade Machine.  I should throw Sergio Rodriguez in the trade as well but I could not get the salaries to match because so many of your players have trade restrictions.  What do you folks think?

0 recs | Comment 20 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Very very interesting idea. Two big pluses here are that we lose Danny G and gain Frye, especially since the former sucks and the latter doesn’t. Not to mention it’d be nice to get Pryzbilla back, although he’d be confined to a backup role behind Andrew Bogut.

However, Yi isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. He has too much financially to offer to the franchise. In terms of raw basketball, I would love this trade. But given the state of the franchise, trading Yi for an unproven player like Fernandez isn’t gonna happen.

I’m just glad someone found a trade idea that DIDN’T involve Cleveland.

-- "I do know that I plead the fizzif."

by Mitchell_M on Jun 10, 2008 12:28 PM CDT   0 recs

Especially if Redd were to be traded I would absolutely love to add a guy like Rudy. I asked around on Blazer’s Edge a few weeks ago to see if Rudy would be available in trades and most people said no-Pritchard and company worked pretty hard to bring him over, so even with Roy roadblocking him a bit at the SG spot they want to hang on to him for now. I wouldn’t exactly call him unproven either-he’s been a lights-out scorer in Spain and is probably the best player outside the NBA at this point.

Mitchell, I think you’re right though that the Bucks aren’t going to trade Yi at this point, especially in a deal that doesn’t bring back a major name. While his rookie season was very up and down, Yi’s still got potential and the marketing angle seems to be very important to Herb Kohl and co. I can’t see them cutting bait this summer unless it’s an incredible offer. If Yi was a random American guy then I’d say the Bucks would probably pull the trigger, but the whole China thing invariably changes the calculus. And it’s ironic that Frye be included in this deal because Yi could very well end up being no better than him.

by Frank Madden on Jun 10, 2008 2:46 PM CDT   0 recs

I’d do it if you would take Charlie V instead of Yi. Charlie V is better and would be a better compliment to Oden. Would you still do that?

by smitty7789 on Jun 10, 2008 3:11 PM CDT   0 recs

Charlie Villanueva and Dan Gadzuric for Channing Frye, Joel Pryzbilla, and Rudy Fernandez? In a heartbeat.

-- "I do know that I plead the fizzif."

by Mitchell_M on Jun 10, 2008 4:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

At least for us Milwaukee people.

-- "I do know that I plead the fizzif."

by Mitchell_M on Jun 10, 2008 4:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A few mistakes

Yi won’t be traded by the Bucks, unless it’s a great deal. They make too much money off of him and his worldwide appeal is too great.

Now, for the Blazer bits… Rudy won’t be traded. Nate won’t have a problem with him because his problems with Sergio are different than what Rudy will do. Sergio has a bad defender, was a HORRIBLE shooter this season, and couldn’t get the offense going as a whole (which was his specialty his rookie year). Because Sergio wasn’t adding much, he didn’t get much playing time behind Steve “Solid” Blake and Jarrett “Erratic but plays hard” Jack.

If Rudy sucks, well, he won’t get playing time. If he is as good as they say, there is NO CHANCE Nate doesn’t play him. And arguing his defence won’t be good so Nate won’t play him doesn’t really work, as Nate has given big minutes to Jack, Outlaw, both sometimes God-awful defenders.

Kevin Pritchard and his team worked very hard to get Rudy to come over and play for only 900,000K, as opposed to 5 million+ EUROS he woulda’ gotten in Europe. They won’t give this guy away after all this work, and Rudy isn’t likely to come to play for just anyone—he is coming over because of Pritchard, because of where the Blazers are right now, and because it is a good situation for everyone involved.

(Also, Euro salaries are tax free, so when ya take into account the weak dollar and 40%+ tax, Rudy is getting paid nuthin’ in NBA terms, while he could get 30+ million Euros, easy. He really wants to show he is really good in the NBA)

Now, it might sound like hyperbole, but Joel Pryzbilla is nearly untouchable as well. Until we KNOW Oden is healthy and can play reasonable minutes, Joel won’t be traded. He is a PERFECT backup. Even when Oden is dominating, I’d be surprised if Joel is traded because he is our only other center. All last season we’d be dominated on the boards because we had no center other than Joel. I doubt they’d let this happen again.

Trading Frye or Sergio in this mess of a trade is just overkill.

Nate coached the 3rd youngest team of all time to 41 wins. He did a great job. Playing Sergio more would not have made things better as he played pretty badly when he DID play. Some Sergio fans love him more than the Blazers (which is fine if Sergio brought you to the Blazers, but extremely odd if you were a Blazer fan first).

Yi or Charlie V are both modern-day NBA power forwards, and as such don’t really have room on the Blazers. Both would fit well next to Oden, sure, because he would compensate for their negatives (especially Charlie V’s complete unwillingness to even look like he is trying on defense), but neither would fit as well as LaMarcus Aldridge.

Losing Rudy, who should get a lot of playing time NEXT to Brandon Roy as both are playmaking shooting guards who can dribble and score, for a backup-backup-backup who is also expensive in Dan Gadzuric and a intriguing but redundant player in Yi or Charlie V doesn’t really work for the Blazers, and losing Yi might not really work for the Bucks.

If Portland makes a move, it’ll be for a PG-type guy who can play with Roy, or a good defending SF. If they make these moves, Pryzbilla, Rudy, Oden, LMA, Roy won’t be a part of them.

Good luck with the upcoming season, Bucks fans, and I wish ya the best. I watched more Bucks games than ever this recent season, and you got a lot of really intriguing players. The only one I really, really didn’t like was Michael Redd. He brought the whole team down with his awful shooting and yelling at others when he didn’t get to shoot.

I compared him to Blazers era Zach Randolph, as he selfishly puts up good numbers but just doesn’t help you WIN.

I don’t consider myself an expert on Redd or the Bucks, so I’m interested if this point of view greatly differs with Bucks fans beliefs on average.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 10, 2008 4:02 PM CDT   0 recs

Logical explanations and good points that prevent the Bucks from getting rid of Gadzuric make me sad.

Well said.

-- "I do know that I plead the fizzif."

by Mitchell_M on Jun 10, 2008 4:29 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Unless the Blazers find a reliable point guard this offseason, Rudy Fernadez will see a lot of playing time if he plays well. Roy showed that he can fill in at point guard for periods of time and those two playing side by side are a dynamic scoring duo.

Also I can’t see the Blazers making a trade unless it is for a point guard because they are pretty set at the other positions. This trade wouldn’t make them that much better so I don’t see it happening. I feel that it would work out a lot better for the Bucks, so if they want to go through with it go ahead.

by Beardsly on Jun 10, 2008 4:18 PM CDT   0 recs

Mortimer, very good points. It made me completely depressed knowing we are probably stuck with Gadzurich’s insane contract, but still good points. As far as the Blazers, if I were them, I wouldn’t touch a thing other than maybe trying to get a point guard. The Bucks, well we need a complete overhaul, no secret. I don’t necessarily see any tradeable pieces on the Blazers that would fit any long term needs of our team. Channing Frye could be a nice player, but he would be nothing more than a backup PF on a team already loaded with tall skinny soft PF’s.

A guy I really like from the Blazers that would fit the Bucks need for a tough SF that has range is Travis Outlaw. I’m not sure if he is tradeable or not, but from what I saw of him last year, I thought he would fit well with us.

So here is a counter offer, how about:

Bucks: Mo Williams and Dan Gadzurich
for
Blazers: Rudy Fernandez, Channing Frye, and Travis Outlaw?

It works on the NBA trade machine

Pros Bucks: Allows Bucks to get rid of Gad’s contract
Gain depth and toughness at small forward with travis outlaw
Allow Ramon Sessions and Fernandez to interchange and fight for PG job
Some (more) depth at PF
Pros Blazers: Great backcourt tandem with Williams and Roy
Some energy and more depth at center for Oden
Able to give Alridge more minutes (which he deserves)
May allow them to use draft pick and pick up a great young SF such as Joe alexander or move up to take Anthony Randolph?

Cons Bucks: Lose Williams
Another lanky PF

Cons Blazers:
Can’t think of any

What do you all say about this?

by smitty7789 on Jun 10, 2008 5:58 PM CDT   0 recs

I agree in that Portland's best bet is to stand pat.

Mo Williams would be interesting, but with all that Portland has already invested to get Fernandez to come over, I would be surprised to see him traded at all. Also, last year, Outlaw signed a contract, and then had a monster year this past year. When’s the last time that happened? Usually it’s right before the contract is signed, not after.

It would have to be an amazing deal for Portland to consider moving him, and I’m not sure that this is an amazing deal for Portland. Fair? Maybe, but Portland can afford to sift through those. A Pau Gasol type trade happens about once a year, and Portland is a prime candidate to take part in it next year and even the year after if they stand pat.

And personally (management may see it differently), I am not in a hurry to lose Przybilla (as you mention below) as a solid backup for Oden’s rookie and sophomore years.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

Chaplain of the Jarrett Jack Fan Club

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on Jun 10, 2008 8:10 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I've gotta read Mortimer's posts all the way through more often before I post.

I think I repeated most of what he said, except he said it better.

One of Two Official Blazer's Edge Poets Laureate for the 2008-2009 Season

Chaplain of the Jarrett Jack Fan Club

"Scholars have long known that fishing eventually turns men into philosophers. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to buy decent tackle on a philosopher's salary." - Patrick McManus

by T Darkstar on Jun 10, 2008 8:15 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

just an edit, I meant to add Joel P. to the trade too from the blazers to the bucks to make the salaries work

"Buck Nasty once called in a robbery, not because it was a crime, but because he was jealous of all the money them mfers were making", "Yeaaa holla at ya boy"

by smitty7789 on Jun 10, 2008 6:10 PM CDT   0 recs

woulb be more interested in sessions then mo

priz not going anywhare. we no ware his family lives so he dont leave town unless its with the team.

25

"you have long words
they make long writing" ratbastird

Celtics over the L*kers, lesser of the 2 evils. But not by much.

by ptwnblzr on Jun 10, 2008 11:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Thanks to the Blazer fans for their input.

It seems like Yi and Rudy are similar in that their teams are perhaps overcommitted to them because of what it took to get them to Milwaukee and Portland, respectively. Neither guy should be untouchable on talent alone, but the uniqueness of their situations makes them highly unlikely to be dealt.

I think the pieces are there for something involving Mo Williams…if Hammond doesn’t like the market for Redd he could hang on to him and look to deal Mo instead, though the deal would probably have to be completed once his BYC status expires July 1. I’d love to get the 13th pick, which it sounds like the Blazers are very willing to shop. Plus throw in some combination of two guys out of Outlaw, Jones, Frye, and Webster (most of those work after July 1 I believe). For the Bucks it gives them luxury tax breathing room in 2009 and reinforcements at the forward position, while the Blazers get the best player in the deal who can complement Roy.

by Frank Madden on Jun 10, 2008 10:21 PM CDT   0 recs

I really LOVE the idea of trading Redd for those players, and with the 14th pick it could really give us a chance to grab a player like Joe Alexander who looked amazing during the last part of the season including the tournament. Redd could be a great compliment to Roy. The only question would be if Roy could play point guard as he might have to do if the Blazers aquire Redd; or I suppose they might be able to move him to SF. Anyway, I like that trade. Would it work under the trade machine?

And by the way Frank. I have been a long time reader and recently signed up to contribute more discussion with a lot of these interesting topics. Thank you very much for giving us Bucks fans something to read about our favorite team. I know this sounds crazy but there actually are Bucks fans in Wisconsin, we’re not all Packer crazy. So thank you and you write very interesting and insightful columns on here.

"Buck Nasty once called in a robbery, not because it was a crime, but because he was jealous of all the money them mfers were making", "Yeaaa holla at ya boy"

by smitty7789 on Jun 10, 2008 11:18 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

How is Mo's defense?

Whatever PG we get, we want them to be an upgrade on defense (even though our team defense should get a huge boost from Oden). How is Mo William’s defense?

I know his numbers are decent, but I took part of that as Milwaukee’s shoot-first style, and I do not remember thinking he was a good defender; at least not a committed one.

Nate’s relationships with his PGs gets too much attention from some Blazer fans, but he does expect certain things from them: consistent effort on defense, pass first mentality, and few careless/stupid turnovers (unless you’re trying to make sumthin’ happen).

Your assessment of the Yi and Rudy situation seems right to me. And even though it took some trouble to convince him to be a part of a hopefully special team, Kevin Pritchard and the Blazer management really, really seem to like Rudy—a LOT. He’s the Kobe of Europe and all that. Judging from what they say about him, and all the awards he’s won and numbers he has put up at age 22, I think they wouldn’t trade him just because everyone wants to see what he can do in the NBA. Struggles to get him over or not, he’s too intriguing of a talent to let go without KNOWING what he is.

I think Yi is the same for Milwaukee.

Before this season, I felt like Mo Williams was an underrated talent who would do well for Milwaukee. After this season, I’m not sure how I feel about him. Is your interest in moving him stem from not mixing well, his contract, or do you just want to elevate Ramon Sessions to starter?

And as far as any trade scenarios go Smitty7789, they gotta NOT include Rudy, Pryzbilla, and the big 3 (Oden, LMA, Roy). Travis Outlaw would have to be a sweetheart deal as well, because he is super-cheap and has the potential to be something pretty special—the deal with him is, it’s impossible to tell. He’s also best friends with Roy, and that can’t hurt.

The Blazers can also afford to be choosey, because soon Raef LaFrentz big deal expires, and so does Steve Francis’. Darius Miles took medical retirement for his horrid knee, so the Blazers are looking at around $30 million in cap space next offseason (we got a window before we gotta re-sign LMA and Roy). Raef’s expiring deal could get someone good in a Kwame for Pau type deal, the cap space can either absorb a big salary in a trade or be used to sign a max deal, etc. There is lots of flexibility coming, and I don’t think they give that up for anyone but a PERFECT player.

I know Mo Williams signed a new deal last offseason, and everyone knows Gadzuric has a longish deal. As does Redd. I think it would eat up the potential cap space… but I’d really like to learn more about Mo from a Bucks fan.

Mortimer

by Mortimer on Jun 11, 2008 12:37 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Wasn't it Miami who wanted Williams

(as well as Bell)? They have cap space and need bodies so that might be your best bet to move either of those guys along with Charlie V. Losing Gadzurek probably means taking on an equal big stiff from the trading partner (Blount?). Best of luck.

Aldridge said. "We feel like we can beat any team. We feel like we can beat the Spurs, Suns, Lakers, Mavericks, whoever any night right now, and we'll still be here when those teams get old and their guys retire. We're going to be here for a long time."

by lee3022 on Jun 11, 2008 3:49 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Mortimer, unfortunately Mo’s defense is the biggest complaint Bucks fans have about him…that’s why we’re always including him in trade rumors :) Of course, he might not look so bad playing with Oden behind him and in general a legit coach might be able to get more out of him on that end.

Mo’s also not a “pure” PG, but to be honest I don’t think that’s really a problem per se—you just have to find the right complement for him. Unfortunately Redd’s not the best guy to pair him with since they’re both scorers who don’t bring it defensively. Roy makes more sense since he can create a bit and plays both ways. But if we were to trade Redd then Mo becomes more useful, especially if Mo were to play next to a more defensive-minded 2 (not sure who that would be of course).

Over at RealGM someone proposed #13/LaFrentz/Jack for Mo/Mason, which I also like. As much as he’s not a big contributor, I’d love to keep Desmond but with both 8/13 you would probably get one of the SFs from this year’s draft. Jack meanwhile provides cheap depth in the backcourt and can guard both spots. LaFrentz is expiring so that could be an asset as well around the trade deadline. Plus he’s better than Gadz.

Smitty, thanks for the kind words and looking forward to hearing more from you. Alex and I definitely encourage you (and everyone else) to use the Fanpost and Fanshot features if you have thoughts, want to post links, etc.

by Frank Madden on Jun 11, 2008 10:44 AM CDT   0 recs

Thanks Guys

I think if the trade machine would let me just throw any names in there, I could have put some more thought into it. Your team is intriguing and I look forward to watching your evolution. Maybe when Nate has a chance to see Rudy in the Olympics, he’ll see what he can do and consider playing him. I just would hate to see him buried on the bench behind Roy.

by RudyFTW on Jun 11, 2008 10:48 AM CDT   0 recs

... a bit of wishful thinking

I know we’re all guilty of it, but too often fans rate the players on their team a bit too highly when looking to make trades. I don’t see Portland willing to give up 3 very good young pieces in order to get Mo Williams essentially—and be laboured with Gadzuric’s contract in the process. Cap space clearing is one of the keys to short/long term success for the Blazers, so moves like that don’t help. Additionally, I don’t think Williams is a good fit for the Blazers. Bayless will be no doubt given a chance to live up to his potential and be the PG of the future in Portland if all goes to plan.

On a side note, I have to commend the Bucks on the moves they’ve made this off-season to establish a form of identity and take a direction. Bringing RJ in is a good move for this franchise to really add a scoring punch and defensive presence at the 3. Now let’s see if Bogut can receive a bit more ball this year—the guy seems to be wasted offensively!

http://asternwarning.blogspot.com -- you've been warned!

by asternwarning on Jul 7, 2008 7:10 AM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Jon McGlocklin, get your facts straight!
Small
The Tide is Changing.
Small
Assement of JA summer league Game II
Search_thumbnail_small
C.C. Sabathia!...and how it relates to the Bucks
Rubberducky_small
Wanted: Fantasy footballers
Small
Seattle/Milw - Proposed Trade
Search_thumbnail_small
A three team trade proposal for Milwaukee, Miami, and Memphis
Rubberducky_small
Premature speculation...
Rubberducky_small
The Bucks are on the clock...
Rubberducky_small
Assorted Finals thoughts with Milwaukee-related tangents

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Brewhoop_small Frank Madden

Brewhoop_small Alex Boeder

Authors

Small Charlie Bury

ad

Site Meter