Starting PG: Ridnour or Sessions?
After adding Luke Ridnour and Damon Jones (and Adrian Griffin) and losing Mo Williams (and Desmond Mason) in the recent trade, the Bucks have five players capable of running the point: Ridnour, Jones, Ramon Sessions, Charlie Bell, and Tyronn Lue.
While the Bucks are long on quantity at the one, quality is more of a question mark, though all five possess positive attributes.
Ridnour capably started all 82 games on a division-winning Sonic team in 2004-05. The same year, Jones hit 43.2 % from outside for the Heat, and the year before that he brought stability and to the Bucks' backcourt. In limited time last year, Sessions was one of the brightest rookies, and a wonderful distributor who averaged 7.5 assists in only 26.4 minutes. Bell plays defense and brings size at the one. Lue is an instant-offense type who nailed 45.3 % of his three-pointers last season.
Then again, the quintet totaled 23 starts last season. That's an average of 4.6 out of 82.
Lue is a career backup and Jones isn't starting material at this stage in his career either. Bell fits in more naturally as a backup shooting guard.
That leaves Ridnour and Sessions, both of whom can push, dribble, and pass the ball quite well. Their shooting and defensive abilities are questioned.
Sessions and Ridnour also went a combined 1-11 starting at point guard last season, with Ridnour getting the lone victory on March 24 against the Blazers.
That's not terribly inspiring, but basketball is a team game, and Ridnour and Sessions are team players. Not only that, the 2008-09 Bucks hardly resemble the clubs Sessions and Ridnour played on last season.

John Hammond, for one, is comfortable with the point guard situation.
"I think we have a good combination to make ourselves very good at the point guard position," Hammond said. "You’ve got Luke, who is in the prime of his career at 27 years old. You’ve got the veteran backup in Ty Lue, who has been in almost every situation possible. He’s always been a great teammate, and he’s going to be supportive of Luke and Ramon.
"And with Ramon we have a good young piece who has value in this league and a piece we want to keep here long term."
Neither Ridnour nor Sessions will have an easy time matching Mo Williams' overall production. Below is last season's stat comparison between the point guard Hammond recently dealt away and his old point guard favorite in Detroit.
| Name | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Steals | Blocks | FG % | FT % | 3PT % |
| Williams | 17.2 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 1.18 | .15 | .480 | .856 | .385 |
| Billups | 17.0 | 2.7 | 6.8 | 1.29 | .22 | .448 | .918 | .401 |
Of course, Michael Redd, Richard Jefferson, Andrew Bogut and everyone else in green and red will benefit from replacing Williams with the more giving Ridnour and Sessions. And that's really the key going forward for the Bucks.
As an NBA veteran of five years rather than five weeks, Ridnour might have the starting edge over Sessions. But like we've witnessed on Team USA at point guard this summer, the better players will rightfully play more minutes.
I'm optimistic that Ridnour will work well with his new teammates, but we already know Sessions does. That's one chief reason why I'd like to see Sessions start the opener on Oct. 28 against the Bulls.
What say you?
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Sessions
Love the article. I believe Sessions will be the eventual starter, but there’s no question the veteran will be given the first go in November.
by Ryne Nelson on
Aug 17, 2008 10:52 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ridnour will start, Sessions will be the backup and get good, quality minutes. Jones will be waaaaay down at the end of the roster, used only if injury occurs. Rue? I have no idea what to do with him.
by upnorthfan on
Aug 18, 2008 9:15 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Good article, I wonder what happens to Charlie Bell after all of these signings? I always liked him in the mold of a defensive point guard, however it looks like he will be relegated to backing up Michael Redd again.
Shout out to Vin Baker, Shawn Respert, Tractor Traylor, and Anthony Mason; you ruined my childhood.
by smitty7789 on
Aug 18, 2008 12:51 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
sessions
22 assists in a game. nuff said
by mrm3x1can on
Aug 18, 2008 2:23 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I also like Sessions as the eventual starter, but until he demonstrates consistency (by getting meaningful minutes off the bench) Ridnour should be the starter.
draftnation.com
by Beardsly on
Aug 18, 2008 3:04 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
There’s definitely a good chance we hear a lot of complaining about Sessions not getting enough minutes. It’s natural—fans want the “potential” guy while the coach wants the guy who will do as he’s told. Hopefully we see enough of Sessions that we have a better feel for what he’s capable of, and it’ll be big for him to actually get minutes in games that count, too. The Bucks might also be keeping one eye on him being a RFA next summer as well; limiting his minutes could also keep his market value lower.
I think the fortunate thing is that there’s not a whole lot of politics involved in this…though that’s largely because nobody’s good enough to have an obvious claim on the position. No one is making monster dollars either, and it seems like everyone will accept whatever role Skiles gives them. I would have been very interested to see Mo as a high-scoring 6th man, but I don’t think he would have ever been happy with that.
by Frank Madden on
Aug 18, 2008 4:02 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I expect Ridnour to start for the Bucks next season.
I’m not altogether sure that Sessions gets the nod ahead of Ty Lue either, if that happens and Lue is playing ahead of Sessions I’ll lose my head completely. I still don’t understand why Lue was signed or paid that money. There was no need to add this further complication to the lineup.
The positives that Sessions brings are also strengths for Ridnour. Add in Luke’s experience and that he’s proven himself at a higher level in this league … and it’s hard to see the youngster getting in ahead of him. I don’t mind Ridnour playing ahead of Sessions either as long as Ramon gets good honest minutes to develop with.
The good thing about Ridnour starting for Sessions is that Luke probably only plays 27-31mpg leaving a considerable void to be filled by his primary backup. The reason for Ridnour’s low minutes as a starter is his weak defense.
Long term it’s Sessions and by long term possibly as soon as next season. I doubt he steals away the position during the course of this coming season … but you never know, maybe he can pull it off.
by Dave W on
Aug 19, 2008 6:42 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs








