Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

Recap: Blazers 102 Bucks 85

The Bucks gave up the back-and-forth theme altogether tonight. After trading wins and losses for almost a month straight, Milwaukee dropped its second in succession as the Blazers led from start to finish, winning 102-85.

Portland was as overwhelming inside as the Bucks were underwhelming outside.

Facing a Bogut-less and woefully defenseless Milwaukee frontcourt, Greg Oden played as if he were a number one draft pick en route to 25 points and 15 rebounds two days shy of his 21st birthday. Lamarcus Aldridge scored with ease and finished with 22/9/5.

January has been good for the Luke Ridnour/Michael Redd starting backcourt, but they'd prefer to forget January 20. They combined to shoot 9-21 with 23 points, two rebounds, and three assists.

Three Bucks

  • Richard Jefferson. One thing is apparent: Jefferson plays aggressively. He doesn't always make perfect decisions, but he attacks the rim, and he gets to the line. Tonight he seemed to play with even more of a chip on his shoulder than usual, and his 23/7 was deserved.
  • Charlie Villanueva. I had nice things to say about Charlie after the first few quarters: He drove to the hoop without relent during an early Blazers' blitz, once again picked up rebounding slack with Bogut out and against an ultra-intimidating frontcourt. But his defining moments came in the fourth quarter on an absolute mammoth block of Sergio Rodriguez and subsequent three-pointer to draw the Bucks within five points. That gave Milwaukee a final burst of hope, nice for those of us watching.
  • Tyronn Lue. We know he can shoot, and tonight Lue dished out four assists without a turnover, earning him important second-half minutes running the point.

Three Numbers

  • 5. Milwaukee's starters totaled just five assists, and the Bucks had only 14 overall. Portland's starting backcourt of Sergio Rodriguez and Brandon Roy had 14 themselves.
  • 58. The Blazers piled up 58 rebounds, almost twice as many as the Bucks' 30. Greg Oden led the way with 15 and each Portland starter had at least six boards. Oden had six offensive rebounds and the Bucks had eight.
  • 4. As in, the Bucks were outscored all four quarter, by 3, 2, 2, and then 10 in the fourth quarter.

Three Good

  • Reserves. Milwaukee's reserves fared fairly well (+15 differential overall), but Scott Skiles was cautious to call on his bench tonight. Luc Richard Mbah a Moute made his only shot, grabbed a couple rebounds, dished an assist, and had a couple steals -- in 11 minutes. That's the fewest minutes he's played in a month and a half. Tyronn Lue and Ramon Sessions both played better than Ridnour, and Malik Allen hit shots. Then again, Travis Outlaw and Rudy Fernandez were the real stars off the bench in this game.
  • Better than a blowout. Milwaukee trotted into the Rose Garden with something of a Buck-in-the-headlights look. They opened by allowing layups, misfiring on long jumpers, even feeding Dan Gadzuric in the post. They fell behind early, and fell behind big: 19-8. Just a few blinks later, Milwaukee was within three points at 22-19. They never climbed all the way back, but at least the Bucks averted what looked like a blowout in-the-making. And yeah, the game was somewhat closer than the final score indicated.
  • Back in town. Milwaukee plays three of four at the BC after dropping two of three on the west coast trip. Good timing, because the Bucks could use a pick-me-up or three.

Three Bad

  • Front and center. The Bucks are always better off with Bogut on the floor, and this was never more evident than tonight against an excellent frontcourt and the league's best offensive rebounding unit. Portland had 19 offensive rebounds, Greg Oden (24/15) delivered one of his finest games as a pro, and Lamarcus Aldridge (22/9/5) was a real dynamo. Meanwhile, Dan Gadzuric was pretty much MIA (0 points, 2 rebounds in 15 minutes) and Francisco Elson was literally MIA, with a DNP. That won't work.
  • Ducking out. Luke Ridnour returned to the state where he played college ball with the Oregon Ducks, but this wasn't a happy homecoming. Even with Portland point guard (and former Buck) Steve Blake out with an injury, Ridnour never commanded control of the position. He came alive in the fourth quarter a bit, but the overall body of work was more meager: 10 points, 3 assists, and a -25 differential in 30 minutes.
  • See Joe Dunk. On the same day it was announced that Rudy Fernandez won NBA.com's fan vote for the final spot in the dunk contest, we also had no chance to see Joe dunk due to the DNP following some recent good basketball by the rook.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

hey buck fans! friendly blazer fan here. ( not trolling I promise )

One thing that was slightly discouraging as a blazer fan with this game was the rebounding disparity. We absolutely crushed on the boards tonight, ending up with twice as many rebounds as the bucks…yet the game remained pretty close for most of the night. The vast majority of nba games that have such a rebounding advantage will end up a blowout, yet the Bucks were in it until the end of the 4th quarter. This obviously was due to the long scoring lulls the tenacious Bucks defense was forcing. I was really impressed with the in your face D, and hope the blazers can adapt a similar style. I hadn’t seen the Skiles era bucks yet this year. Have you guys noticed a marked increase in defensive intensity since Skiles came to town, or was the D this good last year? I’ll be rooting for the bucks to make the playoffs! They are one of my east teams.

by dario argento on Jan 20, 2009 2:11 AM CST reply actions  

Following on...

With what dario said, I think the game would have remained in single digits had the defensive intensity of the first half continued into the second. I was amazed looking up at the scoreboard at halftime to see that the Blazers had committed 11 turnovers to the Bucks 7. They only average 13ish for the season. The interior scoring by Oden and LMA really couldn’t be helped, especially without Bogut in the lineup but in the first half, Blazer guards were forcing things and turning it over due to the solid perimeter D. Jefferson played a large part on both ends in the first half but then his energy went solely into offense in the second. Running out of gas against one of the best home teams from the west will net you a loss every time. Ask Boston. I too wish we could have seen Joe A get some play, especially after he had some impressive showings in predraft workouts here in P-town.

by PtownJake on Jan 20, 2009 2:42 AM CST reply actions  

Dario, the intensity has definitely been notably higher for the Bucks on the defensive end this year. They lack individual defenders—I’d say Luc, Bogut, and RJ are the only guys who are above average in that sense—but the effort level is much improved and guys have become much better at helping out.

Our rebound rates have been in the top five of the league with Bogut as well, so not giving up second chances is also a major part of it. When Bogut’s out we not only lose our primary post option but we’re not nearly as good rebounding and defending inside, which was pretty obvious last night. Gadzuric and Elson might as well be guys off the street at this point.

As a fan it’s tough not to like the team you guys have out in Portland, and I have to say that Blazer fans only make me like the team more. Come by any time and good luck the rest of the season!

by Frank Madden on Jan 20, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions  

Our defense has taken a dramatic turn for the worse the last ten games or so. The BOOK on the Bucks was to shoot 3’s on them because they can not defend it. All of a sudden teams were hitting in double figures on us beyond the ark,

Now with Bogut out, teams know they can drive on us. So now, teams know they can drive on us and also shoot 3’s on us. Yes the first thirty games we were much better defensively than lasty year, but now, it’s not looking pretty.

by upnorthfan on Jan 20, 2009 6:42 PM CST reply actions  

I’m really hoping the problems of late have more to do with Bogut’s absence than with the league just figuring us out, but I have to think that’s part of it, too. And if Bogut misses 15-20 games in total our playoff chances will probably be shot anyway.

by Frank Madden on Jan 20, 2009 7:13 PM CST reply actions  

I posed the question on RealGM this past off season. I asked who can we most ill afford to lose for any length of time? Most said Redd or Jefferson, I said Bogut. I wonder what they would say now?

by upnorthfan on Jan 21, 2009 4:41 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Kksp2_small
Settling on the Bucks' Nicknames.
Ellingtonspiller_small
Possible Bucks Trades
Dsc_0031_small
I overslept
Flag-of-canada_small
The Unofficial Andrew Bogut Trade Site
Small
Joel Przybilla Update
Kksp2_small
How Russel Crowe renewed my faith in Andew Bogut
Insider_g_mbrooks_480_small
Still crying over Marshon Brooks and its only going to get worse...
Small
Andrew Bogut a chance to play against the Kings
Small
BUCKS Courtside Seating Question- Please Help!
Ellingtonspiller_small
NBA 2011-'12 League-Wide Predictions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Brewhoop_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer