Recap: Bucks 95, Bobcats 88
[Redd getting ready, but not needed tonight. More winning times on media row.]
MILWAUKEE - In Brandon we trust.
That's the verdict, right?
If you weren't already convinced, this game made you want to vote early and vote often.
Playing without both Michael Redd and Andrew Bogut for the first time, Brandon Jennings carried new responsibility. But the result was the same: He can play just fine without anyone or anytwo, and he play just fine with anyone or anyfour.
This was his team tonight. Game 10 as an NBA'er, and we already knew that this was his team tonight before, during, and after. True, true, true.
Eschewing his usual "wait until after halftime to go nuts" routine, Jennings spun 17 quick points in the first quarter, leaving fans incredulous (again), leaving Charlotte behind and gasping for air, and leaving no doubt whether he can carry an NBA team.
That fast start was just what the thinned-out Bucks needed. And it was quite an opening show to watch for Michael Jordan, who sat in the real, live crowd, and not in a suite.
Jennings made his presence known awfully fast, but he didn't even know MJ was looking on until after halftime.
"No, I didn't. Not before (halftime). I was wondering who everyone was clapping for, so I had to peek up there a little bit during the timeout, and there he was," Jennings said.
Hard to believe, but in Brandon I trust.
Three Bucks
Brandon Jennings. Just twenty years old, and he's not just bringing the ball up the floor. Jennings leads his mates, each and every night. Milwaukee needed the scoring, they needed it badly considering the absence of not only Redd and Bogut but also Mbah a Moute. And the Bucks never looked back after that first quarter highlight show, which featured three triples.
The Nets pressured and trapped Jennings into a bad kind of career high last game: eight turnovers. The Bobcats attempted a similar defensive philosophy at times, but Young Buck was supercool under pressure. And wow, what pressure he was under. Tasked with scoring, creating, and distributing, Jennings committed just two turnovers while having a hand in most everything during a game-controlling 39 minutes.
He led everyone with 29 points and 7 assists. That's a lot of leading, but even more important perhaps is that Jennings is a leader on the floor. He leads through skill, but also by example: In the third quarter he missed a jumper, but then jumped in front of Raymond Felton to draw a charge. He didn't get the call, but he sure cares, and he is going to make a lot more people care in this city.
Oh, and for those worried about the return of Redd, do you trust in Brandon?
"Michael Redd should be back Wednesday, so that will give us another piece, and I'm really happy he'll back," Jennings said.
Ersan Ilyasova. Starting for the second time in a row, Ilyasova started off the game by doing just what we are hoping and beginning to expect: burying jumpers, defending, and rebounding.
He made 2-3 from outside even against a smallish Charlotte lineup that could keep up. He hit all three from the line too, and that's important stuff in a game when Milwaukee was easily outpaced at the free throw line again. Ilyasova packed 13/7 in 24 minutes.
Kurt Thomas. This honor could go to a few others, but Thomas deserves kudos for stepping up in the absence of Bogut. Thomas, who despite seeming precisely like a Scott Skiles kind of guy, entered the game with almost as many DNP-CD's (4) as games played (5).
In dire need of low-post help, Thomas delivered off the bench with 4 points and 7 rebounds (4 offensive). And don't look now (okay, do look), but he has strung together consecutive games shooting 2-2 and is 6-7 on the year. He can step and hit that side jumper. Back to those four offensive boards...
Three Numbers
2. Without Bogut and Mbah a Moute, you might think the Bucks would have trouble protecting the glass. Not so much. The Bobcats pulled in two offensive rebounds (half as many as Kurt Thomas) on 29 missed shots tonight.
0. Charlie Bell has not turned the ball over in the last two games, 31 minutes each. Solid. He's not an offensive force, in fact he is hardly passable as a scoring threat these days, but Bell keeps the ball moving and takes care of it while doing so.
17. The Bobcats shot 26-43 from the stripe. Those 17 misses sting in a seven point loss. Still, the Bucks can't depend on teams to misfire like that from the line.
Three Good
Home cooking: A nice theme with Thanksgiving less than a week away.
Typically it's a major problem when you lose your star guard before the start of your first homestand of a season; a problem compounded when you lose your star post player during your first homestand of a season.
In fact, that's a devilish recipe for counting down until draft day by December. So you would think. Instead the Bucks finished a positively rousing 13 days at the BC with a win and 5-1 record on the homestand. And the only loss was against a top-tier Mavs team at the buzzer in overtime. Pretty amazing stuff, and hopefully it is catching on: the 15,578 on hand marked the largest crowd since the home opener.
Coast to coast. Almost. Charlotte went up 3-0 to start and that was that. The Bucks ran off seven straight points and led from then on. It's okay to only be ahead for 1:11 if it's the final 1:11 of the game. But the Bobcats led for the first minute and eleven seconds and trailed for the next 46:49.
A surprisingly authoritative, clear-cut win, given the circumstances.
Bench. Hakim Warrick began his night by inbounding the ball to Raymond Felton, problematic foremost because Felton plays for the Bobcats. Shortly thereafter, Warrick was stuffed by Derrick Brown. Yeah, Derrick Brown. And with that, I was a bit worried about Warrick, who has been uneven at best the last week.
He recovered nicely though, adding 16 points and 9 rebounds in a sixth man role off the bench. Warrick was on the floor in the fourth quarter as the Bobcats were close enough that a slip-up could have cost Milwaukee the win. But Warrick didn't slip up, slotting 7 points in the final quarter. And he made 6-7 overall at the line, an amazing sum on this team.
Thomas was good, as previously mentioned. And Ridnour (8 points, 3 assists in 17 minutes) was quietly effective again. Jodie Meeks (team leading +12 differential) continues to play assertive ball, and thankfully a couple of his long-range efforts fell in tonight. For a team with seemingly little depth after injuries, 36 points off the bench is rather remarkable.
Three Bad
Hanging around. Yeah, it sort of feels good to be able to complain about not "thoroughly closing out" a "lesser" team in the fourth quarter, but that's just where we are. So while it's luxurious to entertain such a notion, it doesn't take away the fact that it's true, and in the end, a complaint nonetheless. The Bobcats drew to within 93-85 with just over two minutes, as Milwaukee controlled but didn't completely put away the game in the second half.
Sad Francisco. Elson struggled about as much as you can struggle in two minutes. One offensive rebound followed by some sort of seemingly uncontested floating hook shot that barely drew iron from a couple feet away preceded a fadeaway airball. With Bogut out for a while, it would be nice to get something positive from Elson, particularly when the Bucks will need his size against bigger teams.
Free. Not to belabor the point, but the Bucks can't give folks some many free shots. Luckily, the Bobcats also fit into this Bad with their inaccuracy (60.4 %) at the free throw line.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
I'm Not Trying to be a Downer
But we’re really setting ourselves up for some pain. No Bogut against Tim Duncan? Next week will be reality hitting, that’s when we’ll know what we have.
I love Jennings’ everything so far, but I fear his portrayal in the national media. They’re already saying he’s the next Iverson and reducing the Bucks to one. Do we really want the next Iverson? No. I want Brandon freaking Jennings playing his all ‘round team oriented game. When I saw the Bucks play the Nets, each player picked up at some point to contribute. Young Buck’s line was decent, but outside of that third quarter he seemed a bit off. When he’s on though man…
by MadTown Hoops on Nov 21, 2009 2:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Jennings is not Iverson
Nothing against Iverson and the great career he’s had but I don’t want that kind of player as our superstar and Brandon Jennings is not that kind of player. Jennings is a true point guard who strictly plays his position. Iverson is a really short combo guard who doesn’t really have a position who plays one-on-one. Iverson has done quite a bit but everyone’s off his bandwagon for a reason.
by Donald Driver on Nov 21, 2009 2:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
People wouldn't be off Iverson's bandwagon if he wasn't an apparent egomaniac.
Alas: he is.
I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.
by Prevenge on Nov 21, 2009 3:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
just a lazy comparison
It’s such an easy comparison, of course lots of lazy sportswriters will make it. But that doesn’t mean we have to actually let it dictate our perception. To me, Brandon’s more like a Tony Parker than an Iverson. But Parker couldn’t shoot much coming in.
And that brings me to something else that I just can’t get over: when did he become such a great shooter?!? The draft reaction was all about how Jennings couldn’t shoot, etc etc, and nothing in the summer league or preseason really made me think that was wrong.
But since the first game he’s been a confident jump-shooter. What happened? I know he says he spends a lot of time shooting with Kelvin Sampson, but come on. He’s just a whole different player. His shot is certainly not “broken,” as one pundit said. It’s pretty amazing. I think if he continues at a level anywhere close to how he’s played so far, that’s a story that needs looking into. He seems to be getting great coaching, and taking advantage of it. And we are loving every minute of it… ;-)
by curak on Nov 21, 2009 7:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously he’s unique, but people always want to compare the next big thing to someone who came before. I think we just need to take all the comparisons as flattery regarding Jennings. This only happens to the good ones.
by Alex Boeder on Nov 21, 2009 4:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
also he shoots 34% from the floor
which is why i was never on his bandwagon
by sdsowlsa on Nov 21, 2009 5:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Alex, I think not letting Charlotte get any closere than 8 is a sign of improvement, moreso than a negative they were’t able to win by a larger margin.
by upnorthfan on Nov 21, 2009 6:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Really had to look hard for bad things on this one; absolutely no major problems. Just didn’t seem like they should have allowed the Bobcats in the game there at the end. But yeah, that was a pretty thorough win.
by Alex Boeder on Nov 21, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
matchups became a problem late IMO
Flip was bullying Ridnour a bit at the 2, and a couple times the Ersan/Warrick 4/5 combo got pretty exposed by Wallace just charging through to the bucket. Not having Bogut wasn’t as obvious given Charlotte’s lack of bulldozer types up front, but will probably be a different story against Memphis.
by Frank Madden on Nov 21, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Right. I’m happy Wallace opted to not do that earlier.
by Alex Boeder on Nov 21, 2009 4:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Team Effort Pays Off!!!
I’m glad the Bucks won another game. Most importantly they did with it without their two big names; Andrew BOGUT and Michael REDD. So the team deserves extra credit for the way they’ve responded today.
My man Carlos DELFINO did not had the best game as compared to previous effort against the Nets. Then again, he scored 9 crucial points which in to a certain extent made the difference.
Finally I guess it’s all about Brandon JENNINGS. What can I say? He is a future leader of this franchise, no doubt about that. Already he is showing plenty for the Bucks. I hope more great success for him and this team.
Well done Bucks!!!
VAMOS ARGENTINA!!! Please visit my blog @ http://mundoalbiceleste.blogspot.com
by sivanjohn on Nov 21, 2009 7:46 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
He is a future leader of this franchise, no doubt about that.
Dunno if Im willing to go that far yet. But he is, thus far, generating high levels of Awesome.
by SoCalBucksFan on Nov 21, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Team on the rise...
As long as Jennings can continue to lead, I see many of the Bucks getting better individually and getting tighter as a unit.
And I think they’ll need to, to give more help to Brandon. I think Skiles supports every bit of scoring Jennings is doing these days (because many others aren’t making shots) but I suspect the load on Jennings is more than a slim rookie should be asked to bear except in the short term. (Thought he looked a bit tired last night in the 2nd half.)
Maybe it’s true of NBA teams in general, but the Bucks right now are a strong mix of “pretty darn impressive” and “oops, that’s not good.” Without predicting Jennings future degree of greatness, I believe he’s responsible for more than half of the “pretty darn impressive” that the team shows. Think he’s the tide that raises all his teammates’ boats.
by unklchuk on Nov 21, 2009 11:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
definitely worried about wearing BJ3 down
Agreed we’re asking a lot of him right now, and Charlotte’s pressure on the ball did seem to wear him down and necessitate more of the Ridnour/Jennings backcourt. Hopefully he can do it again tonight, but second night of a home/road back-to-back seems ripe for an off night.
(note my reverse jinxing has yet to fail this year when it comes to Jennings)
by Frank Madden on Nov 21, 2009 1:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if it's your reverse jinxing
or just Jennings not failing yet.
I support the Tornado Release ... and Young Bucks.
by Prevenge on Nov 22, 2009 1:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















