Recap: Bulls 83, Bucks 81
The Bucks ever-so-narrowly missed the chance to win in Chicago for the first time in eight tries. And they did so by missing by a lot. Twice.
With 14 second to go in the fourth and the Bulls up 83-81, Brandon Jennings pulled up for a jumper just past the free throw line, but Derrick Rose blocked the attempt with ease. For Rose, the play provided a bit of sweet redemption because Jennings had forced him into a turnover and then floated a jumper over him just two possessions earlier.
Still, the block gave the ball back to Chicago with little time and less hope. But Joakim Noah (he of the absurd free throw form) spun consecutive free throws off the rim to give Milwaukee hope with 12 seconds to spare.
Unfortunately, the final try proved just as futile as the previous one. Jennings found an all-too-hesitant Ersan Ilyasova beyond the arc who fired a shot that hardly got closer to the rim than when Rose stuffed Jennings. Airball, out of bounds, game over.
The under-one-minute sequences underscored Milwaukee's thin late-game offensive options. Jennings was again very good, but after taking the previous three shots the Bucks had to figure the defense would cave around him. So they tried to spring free Ilysasova, who with the game on the line came up just as his final line (0-3 for 0 points and 3 fouls.) indicates: empty.
Three Bucks
Brandon Jennings. There is style (personified by God Shammgod here) and there is substance (think Tim Duncan since the first time you saw him play until further notice). Jennings shows both plenty of style and plenty of substance. And not just "for a 20 year-old" either. Case in anecdotal point: late second-quarter, Young Buck knifes down the middle of the lane and every-so-slightly darts left, helping draw attention away from Dan Gadzuric, who is cutting to his right. A simple around-the-back pass results in an easy dunk for Gadzuric. Style and substance, at once.
Jennings certainly more than held his own in an initial matchup with Derrick Rose, an accomplishment in itself. Unafraid to assume the desperately-needed role of scoring point guard on a team with limited firepower and without its best scorer, the rook' netted a cool 25 points. As such, he's led the Bucks in scoring in all three games. And he's fast showing a defensive character. Jennings led the club with a pair of steals, and he defended Rose into a turnover on a decisive play with less than half a minute in the game. In fact, he stayed in front of Rose pretty nicely for much of the game, and contributed to Chicago's point guard pretty pedestrian 5 assist, 5 turnover line. For Jennings, 25 points, 4 assists, 2 steals, 2 turnovers, some learning, and even more growing. Well-done.
Andrew Bogut. The defense was mostly steady, and though we could use a few more offensive bursts with Redd sidelined, Bogut stepped up on both ends of the floor tonight. 'Drew threw in eight straight in the second quarter, with all but one shot coming from one or the other baseline on running half-hook types. The Bucks again found Bogut for a few scores in the fourth, and he finished with 16 points, a delightful sum after the first two games.
Maybe you watched the second Bucks/Bulls preseason game, probably not. Bogut didn't play, which worked out nicely for Joakim Noah, who pitched in 23 points and 20 boards. With the Bucks' big man back in the middle tonight, Noahwas nearly nothing until an emphatic slam late in the fourth quarter. Not coincidental.
Charlie Bell. Far from a poor showing in a fill-in role for Redd starting at the two, Bell began the night by frustrating John Salmons, which led to a 3-12, 4-turnover night for Chicago's starting shooting guard. And while he couldn't replicate a Redd-like scoring punch, he did notch 11 points on 5-11 from the field and hit a big three in the fourth quarter to close the gap to 78-75. In sum, Bell played a great game off the bench, only he was forced into the starting lineup before that could happen.
Three Numbers
2. Players not named Brandon Jennings (who made 3-4) on the Bucks combined to make two free throws tonight in Chicago. Not a terribly efficient two free throws either, considering it required six attempts. The Bulls absolutely hammered the Bucks at the line, making 20-31 compared to 5-10. That major descrepancy tipped the final score scale in Chicago's favor.
5. The Bulls connected on their final five attempts from long-distance. And that came after an 0-6 start on threes in the first half. Jannero Pargo (2-3) and Brad Miller (1-1) delivered off the bench for big threes and combined for 23 points -- a whole lot more than the combined eight points Milwaukee got from six different reserves. And the Bucks' bench shot 0-6 on three-pointers, including Ersan's Air.
12. Rose's block on Jennings was the most memorable (and reminiscent of this one against Rondo in the playoffs), but it was just one of 12 for the Bulls. Noah led the way with five while Deng and Salmons followed with a pair each. Each Bucks starter was blocked at least once, and Jennings and Delfino were each stuffed thrice. This group isn't going to make that many shots in the first place; can't afford that many with no hope whatsoever of making it to the basket. Meanwhile, Bogut registered three of Milwaukee's five blocks.
Three Good
Super Tuesday. Like every election day, statisticians tonight projected that candidates won political elections far before all of the votes were counted. Mattero'fact, even before everyone voted, they drew conclusions by considering populations and samples. And they always are able to do this with (varying degrees of) confidence. This type of scientific, qualitative predictive analysis would typically caution against reading too much into even a purely random sample size of 3 out of 82. Even if the results are overwhelming. And it's fine (if not wise) to keep that general line of logic in mind when considering the early Brandon Jennings Rookie of the Year campaign. Then again, Jennings has every look of a top contender thus far. He surely has the attention of voters here and now. After a More-Than-Good Friday in Philly and Stirring Saturday in Milwaukee, this was a rather Super Tuesday in Chicago for Jennings. Looking forward to this ____ Friday in Minneapolis.
Bogut/Jennings. As noted above. With Redd out, this inside-outside duo will need to produce games like this for Milwaukee to have a shot to win. And like tonight, that might not even be good enough. But these two can give the Bucks a chance.
Up... The Bucks carried their momentum from the triumph at the BC on Saturday to the Windy City in a most excellent first quarter, stealing a 25-13 lead after the first twelve. And they fought through the second on the back of Bogut to carry a healthy 14-point lead into the locker room. Really inspiring stuff. They looked like a club coached by Scott Skiles, and I mean that in only the best way: on the ground fighting for loose balls, hounding defensively both inside and out, everyone passing the ball, and generally making the most of a very limited unit.
Three Bad
...and Down. But in stark contrast to the game before, the Bucks deflated in the third quarter, and they couldn't keep pace with a free-flowing Bulls attack that moved the ball quickly offensively. After holding the Bulls to an awfully silly 29 points in the first half, the Bucks allowed 54 after halftime. A two-point loss in Chicago on the heels of losing Redd isn't so bad, but when you have an 18 point cushion on the road, don't lose it -- because this team won't have that very often in the first place.
Eight too much. The divisional and geographic rivals continue to fatten up against their northern neighbors: The Bulls have run off eight straight wins on their home floor against the Bucks.
Defending Deng. Luol Deng, Man of the Match. 24 points, 20 rebounds, and if that doesn't explain his aggressiveness enough then the fact he made 9-11 free throws compared to Milwaukee's entire team making 5-10 free throw should give you a feel. The Bucks threw some different people at Deng, but that didn't much matter; not tonight.
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
Tough loss, but still some encouraging signs
This team is about Bogut and Jennings until further notice, so it was reassuring to see Bogut finally get his act together a bit and Jennings to continue to play so well. It’s a shame he doesn’t have more weapons around him, because I feel like we’re being cheated a little bit. Great to see he can score, but the last play underscores how few weapons we have in crunch time.
Good to see Skiles using some different looks to get Bogut the ball. He was able to do a lot of damage facing up from a bit further out. He went right a number of times as well, even though he usually favors his left.
I thought the Rose/Miller PnR really got them going in the fourth, Bogut had to respect Miller and that opened the door for Rose to get some good looks mid-range. They also did a great job using pressure to disrupt our offense. All the extra time we were taking to get into our offense meant a lot more tough shots late in the clock.
Gotta do better on the boards—Bogut/Warrick got double digits but Deng wrecked Delfino/Luc on the offensive glass.
by Frank Madden on Nov 4, 2009 12:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
‘My heart is broken but I have some glue’. Tough loss.
I like what I saw in the first half. But again this team has no margin for error especially withuot Redd. He would have brought few easy points on the charity stripe.
by cluny_brown on Nov 4, 2009 3:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
PS : Thansk for the recap like usual !
by cluny_brown on Nov 4, 2009 3:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thankyou for the recap, I missed this one as league pass decided to break my computer.
by Asce on Nov 4, 2009 4:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This loss could be a common theme
Good Recap.
I think we will see a lot of these types of losses this season. Tough D, good effort, Jennings doing a ton to keep the Bucks in the game. There are just too few bullets in the gun for the Bucks right now, even when Redd is back.
This season is really to setup the future.
Hopefully Bogut can prove he can stay healthy while continuing to hit the boards and score from the post.
Hopefully Jennings can continue this amazing start. Players like Jennings can attract Free Agents. Scorers love to play with good point guards. Right now he is scoring because he has too, he is still looking to distribute.
The Bucks are at least showing signs that better days really are coming as for the last few years the feeling has been, “When will it hit bottom, so it can start getting better?”
by We're Bucked on Nov 4, 2009 8:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Fantasy impact of Redd's injury?
Nice recap. I especially loved the Jennings-Rose matchup analysis. I usually don’t start rookie PGs on my fantasy teams in their 3rd pro game, but didn’t you just get a feeling Jennings would bring it against D-Rose?
Anyway, I just did an article about the fantasy impact of Redd’s injury on my site, w/ several nods to this site (great job by the way — you made writing it a lot easier). Feel free to let me know what you think here or there. Thanks again, and I’ll be checking in for updates.
by steven (@fantasyhoopster) on Nov 4, 2009 9:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff, Steven
Here’s the link if anyone’s interested:
http://fantasyhoopster.com/2009/11/04/20-second-timeout-michael-redd/
Delfino’s played the two previously, so he should see some marginal increase in minutes as well. Though if he’s just chucking indiscriminately from 28 feet all the time it won’t really matter.
by Frank Madden on Nov 4, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls escaped, no doubt about it
This game did not look good early..or late in fact. The Bulls came out shooting 28 % and had only 29 point at half time. But guess who came off the bench and really lit a spark? That’s right, Jannero Pargo did his poor man’s Ben Gordon impersonation and had 10 points in 13 minutes. Sure it helped that the Bucks brought a 3rd quarter lineup featuring Luke Ridnour as their best player and went ice cold. The Bucks had no choice because Brandon Jennings was seriously sucking wind towards the end of the game.
I’m pretty sure it was because of the fact that Jennings was spent that the Bucks were determined to shoot a 3 to end the game and avoid over time. They were so determined that they designed a play for Ersan Ilyasova who’s shot was as off as that goofy looking mask he had on. Speaking of "Young Money", Brandon was terrific tonight. Hitting all kinds of big shots and fancy behind the back passes in transition. He even gave Rose all kinds of problems, forcing 5 TOs. Luckily Rose came through with a huge block late on Brandon, bringing back memories of last season’s playoff block on Rondo. Still, Rose should be a better ball handler then what he’s shown against Chalmers and Jennings.
Some other unsung heroes, Miler did his old crafty YMCA veteran pump fake and drive move, which seems slower then molasses in January but somehow gets away with it. He’s a very solid spot up shooter and teams have to respect his shot. Noah had a very nice defensive game with 12 boards and 5 blocks. Still, he only contributed 4 points and Bogut had his post game going against Noah with 16 points and 13 rebounds.
"Tyrus run, RUN!" - Vinny D
http://bullsallday.com/
by RogersPark Kris on Nov 4, 2009 11:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Pargo was a big spark
He was getting anywhere he wanted. Unfortunately Jennings can’t play the whole game, and I agree he did look to be tiring by the end, which made his last couple hoops all the more impressive.
by Frank Madden on Nov 4, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is this a sign of things to come
Everyone knows in the NBA every team can make a run in the 4th quarter. The teams that put games away have a go to guy. Jennings is working on it, but he needs to figure out who the “go to” guy will be at the end of the game. I hate seeing Warrick take a 3 late in the game. Illysasova needs to step up and perform a little better for the Bucks to succeed. Meeks, we need that sweet jumper soon.
by Fun in Wi on Nov 4, 2009 11:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Jennings D
Late in the game it was truly fun to watch Jennings and Rose matchup. Those two were just warriors.
by Fun in Wi on Nov 4, 2009 11:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Cool to see Jennings not backing down, though I’d expect as much. I was surprised Jennings got into the lane for those two late hoops—would have been easy to settle for jumpers.
by Frank Madden on Nov 4, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Scott Skiles lost this game
Near the end of the 3rd quarter, the chicago announcers started smelling blood and taking about how easy a team Mil was to reel in. then they posed a geat question. “how long will Scott Skiles leave this unit (set of players) in the game?” – why? they were not scoring points and skiles just watched them lose their lead without calling key timeouts and/or making lineup changes. This was not a loss due to Mil’s defense. The Bulls heated up but Mil had a big lead. OK defense is important but not scoring is no different in b-ball than not playing defense. The game was lost due to lack of scoring from the reserve SG’s but also lack of scoring in general. I would have liked Skiles to use a timeout when the other team is getting hot. Qs. why does Gadzuric play 13 minutes and take two shots? Why does Warrick allowed to throw the ball at the backboard for 34 minutes without being told to get the ball to someone else? Why is Meeks not getting 10 minutes to try and get his game going – how can you get any thing going in 1-2 minutes of play? Whether Skiles goes with either Ukik or Meeks while Redd is out, he has to give these guys 4 minute increments so they can get something going instead of 1-2 minute increments. I might have been wrong but I think Delfina did some time at SG – why? he was brickin it. I admit i don’t really know exactly what should have been done, but my feeling is that Skiles didn’t do enough offensive coaching.
by Bill0202 on Nov 5, 2009 2:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
True. Very True. Skiles went with a Defensive unit and didn’t get much offense from it. You have to have the offense to compliment the D. I do agree Warrick needs to score for this team to win, but his game needs to be within 12 feet.
by Fun in Wi on Nov 6, 2009 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Warrick should have taken it closer to the basket or maybe go to the basket – make it ugly or get a foul.
I think you always have your best offensive unit possible out there and add as much defense as necessary to prevent the other team from outscoring you – doing it the other way around doesn’t win as many games and just makes the losses respectable.
by Bill0202 on Nov 6, 2009 5:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















