Recap: Spurs 112, Bucks 97

MILWAUKEE -- And so this is reality for an average team.
Shouldn't be taken as a slight either, because at 12-16 that label is more generous than anything.
After exciting, excruciating losses against top teams like the Lakers, Magic, and Mavericks, temptation begged you to feel that the Bucks were on the cusp of something you dare not say out loud, but something you thought to yourself with a smile.
But all of the hard-fought games against good teams at the Bradley Center this season, all of the recent success against the Spurs -- none of that history helped in the present.
Tim Duncan was first-class and San Antonio's second-unit was too, as the Bucks just never had it from the opening tip on a holiday-hangover night for Milwaukee. The Spurs led from start-to-finish, enjoying a double-digit lead for most of the night.
The next step isn't always forward, as we are learning the hard way. Just because the Bucks have almost won so many games doesn't mean they will win the next ones.
This made four losses in a row at the BC, and you know a few wins will come soon. But in reality, when you are still average, playing against the really good teams is usually going to end somewhere on the scale of losing.
Three Bucks
Hakim Warrick. A few too many of those fading mid-range jumpers for my liking, but Warrick worked it fairly effectively, sinking five of those shots outside the paint. Not bad for guy who hadn't made five shots altogether in a game since Dec. 2 in Washington.
The makes/misses next to the hoop overlap, but as the shot chart reveals, Hak' shot the same percentage inside (3-6) and outside (5-10) the paint, resulting in a fine 8-16 night for 23 points.
Nice that he made a good portion tonight, but as someone who entered the game at 32.0 % from 10-15 feet on the year, it would be best if his confidence in that awkward leg-kicking-fading-jumper doesn't balloon too much. I prefer him around the hoop, where he dunks and draws fouls. He shot 7-10 from the line tonight, a major reason the score stayed as relatively close as it did late.
Jodie Meeks. The second-rounder earned a season/career-high 28 minutes after providing a serious offensive lift off the bench. He lived up to his advertisement as a long-range sharpshooter, making 3-4 from outside on his way to 15 points. And his decisive, fast runs to the hoop were equally encouraging. Meeks blasts to the basket were as fast as Michael Redd is slow in his journeys to the rim. Whether Jodie will ever possess Mike's crafty body control is another story.
Scott Skiles after the game:
And you can tell, different from some of our other guards, he has a burst of a speed and athleticism which is genuinely NBA-like.
Luke Ridnour. San Antonio's bench just ran all over Milwaukee, but the Bucks' best were also reserves -- all three tonight. Flying ever-so efficiently in the face of logic, Luke keeps shooting like he has all year, making 5-10 tonight, pretty much in line with his 50.7 % touch from the field entering the game.
He packed five assists into his 20 minutes and led the team with a +8 differential.
Three Numbers
5. Five straight games with a new leading scorer for Milwaukee: Ilyasova/Jennings in Cleveland, Delfino versus Sactown, Bogut in Indy, Redd against the Wiz, and now Warrick against San Antonio. Just a single win in those games though. Balance is nice, but things workced better in early November when Jennings or Bogut led the way and the Bucks won seven of nine.
75.8 % San Antonio's bench shot 22-29 (.758) from the field, led by Antonio McDyess (7-8), Manu Ginobili (5-6), and Roger Mason (4-5).
12. Andrew Bogut led starters for Milwaukee with 12 points. Meanwhile, McDyess scored 14 points in 17 minutes off the bench for San Antonio.
Three Good
Jodie. The Bucks have hit on so many second rounders of late that people entered the season with legitimate hopes that Meeks would contribute. And while he has yet to consistently live up to his reputation as a sharpshooter (or even average-shooter), 'twas nice to see Meeks break out a bit.
Happy birthday, Joe. So that's nice.
We have a bit in common, Alexander and I. Same name (Alexander), same age (23), same amount of playing time this season (0 minutes, 0 seconds).
Marcus Haislip. This first-round Bucks' bust finally made it happen at the BC, nailing a three and blocking a shot. So maybe there is time for Alexander. Yes, Good is getting a bit droll here tonight.
Three Bad
A little bit of everything. We move forward each day optimistic that Bogut will carry the club, Jennings will sparkle, Redd will revert back to his old form, and the defense will take care of the rest.
Instead: Bogut blended in, you hardly noticed him on a night when Tim Duncan (26/8/4) was so Duncanish in thoroughly dominating the paint. Young Buck had yet another slow start in contrast to Tony Parker, Redd didn't score or really do anything else, and the 112 points was the most the Bucks allowed since the 112 they gave up over a month ago in their first game against the Spurs.
Luc? Gauging Luc Mbah a Moute is one of those difficult things. He has one of the worst PER's among regulars in the NBA. But we know (and this is one of those times when an annoying cliché is actually true) that you cannot quantify what he offers in numbers.
We have been calling for The Principal to start given his defensive excellence combined with Carlos Delfino's mediocre modest meager vaguely traceable offensive contributions of late (and please don't be surprised that he is shooting under 40.0 % this year, because that's just who he is: an under 40.0 % shooter).
Anyway, Mbah a Moute didn't get in the game until the Bucks were down 74-53 late in the third quarter. In other words, most everyone was playing rather terribly and another opponent had traipsed into the BC and scored at will - and yet no Luc. Now, he didn't come in and turn around the game (it was too late for that and he isn't one to do such a thing anyway), but this just doesn't make much sense, especially considering the timing of it all.
The defense is a given, but The Prince was also coming off a very strong three-game run offensively for his standards: 10.3 points on 66.7 % from the field. He was even getting to the line (!) making 10-16 total in those three.
Skiles' post-game take on the Mbah a Moute situation:
Nothing. I'm just searching right now. Searching for anything I can find. We've now lost four in a row at home. We've taken a noticeable downtick in the way we've played. And so I've got to try to locate where I can to find someone to get us going.
We're talking about playoffs? Playoffs?
Maybe not so much. Next up for Milwaukee is a trip to Charlotte on Monday. The Bobcats (tied for 8th/9th in the East with the Bulls) lost tonight, but they are still just a game back of the Bucks... which means another loss could put Milwaukee on the outside looking in at the playoff picture in the top-heavy East -- all before January for a team that started 8-3.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Luc
That’s just nuts that Skiles would simply ignore the guy that long. If you’re searching for something, I recommend starting with guys who have been showing a pulse. Earlier this week I defended Skiles’ penchant for his erratic rotation, but I don’t have a good defense for this one.
The major difference between this game and the last one is that the Spurs didn’t seem like they could miss. Too many open looks, but the Spurs just execute so well and get the ball to the open guy almost every time. And tonight the open guy never seemed to miss…Duncan, Dice, Mason were just lights out. Surprised me to see that the Bucks made 9/17 from three and the Spurs only 5/13.
Bucks made more free throws (18-15) too, madness.
by Alex Boeder on Dec 27, 2009 12:46 PM CST up reply actions
On Meeks
And you can tell, different from some of our other guards, he has a burst of a speed and athleticism which is genuinely NBA-like.
That’s a surprising way to put it. In my viewing of it, this was not Skiles full of semi-arrogant confidence. This came from a humble, searching Skiles.
Often in his post-game comments he talks like he hopes there is a terrifically-sharp authority listening someplace and he wants their nod of approval. IOW, his public statements often seem to come with private nuances, unnecessary but no extra charge.
So why praise Meeks (in reply to a media question) by implying that some of their other guards don’t have NBA levels of speed and athleticism?
One possible reason: to convey his depression about where the team is at now. Using the Meeks bright spot to show how dark it is around him.
That’s sort of how it came off to me. And when you watch this team, the lack of athleticism is pretty remarkable — it’s frustrating for me, probably frustrating for Skiles. No one can really attack the basket. Redd at least knows what he is doing, so he can drive into the lane and get calls sometimes, but he is also just so slow now.
by Alex Boeder on Dec 27, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions
And our only athletic guys lack any kind of strength
To mask the lack of athleticism you need to execute really well, and it’s not happening right now. When jump shots aren’t falling their only other option is Bogut, but he just hasn’t shown to be a consistent threat game to game. The Bucks have very much tried to establish him early on in recent weeks but he can’t impose his will on everybody. Defensively the second and third rotations haven’t always been there.
As for athletes, Warrick can jump out of the gym but his lack of strength makes him a liability on defense, so he’s never going to be more than a 6th man/role player type. And Jennings has great quicks but his inability to finish around the hoop means it’s not as useful as it could be. Coming in we all thought he’d be terrific in transition but we haven’t really seen that either. It’s not all his fault—I don’t think he has great personnel around him for it—but it’s still be a bit of a disappointment.
by Frank Madden on Dec 27, 2009 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
Meeks, part 2
1. I’d think Redd is the one who most significantly doesn’t have NBA speed and athleticism. And I’d suspect Skiles is uncomfortable having to play him. And the fact that he has to may be one of the fault lines in our team.
2. Skiles compliments Meeks but doesn’t show enthusiasm. Gratitude, yes, that Meeks has some qualities missing in his other players. But I’m not sure Meeks is on Skiles fantasy team. Skiles typical stance is that Meeks has played quite well, is learning and developing, and will be given a chance to earn more playing time. Nothing like a promise of a future role in the rotation. Just the chance to earn one.
And, saying Meeks has NBA-like speed and athleticism doesn’t raise Meeks above the crowd of guys competing to earn roster spots. It just makes him part of the crowd who are NBA-like.
Ugly
I have been a bucks fan for a long time. I was at the game last night and left after 3 quarters (it is tough to get your wife to really get into the bucks with games like that). The entire game the Spurs were extremely fluid (first and second teams), and when they pick and rolled they got something out of it. When we pick and roll (Bogut) the center steps out and we are not getting anything productive out of it is extremely predictable after it worked for a few games. The Bucks had plenty of opportunities for layups and missed all night long.
I wish Skiles would give one rotation a couple games. If our defense has been terrible then Mbah a Moute should start and play a lot period. He sets the tone and Bogut can intimidate at times and Ersan at least gives it 100% on defense besides a few gaffs each game. Redd is weak on D but should at least get a few more games to try and find some kind of consistency. He can get to the lane but it surprises me how often he gets the bal land has absolutely no intention of passing or dishing. I love Jennings and his heart for the game but I worry about him on D. I dont question his effort but I think Washington told Earl Boykins just to take the ball and work Jennings and he did it both games. Jennings gets mauled on screens often and I feel like even though he is a really smart player he has a lot to learn on D and to make wise decisions (not jumping against Earl Boykins in the first game against Washington). Kinda like learning how to use his quickness better.
I wish Skiles would go with Bogut, Ersan, Moute, Redd, Jennings. I like Thomas, Warrick, Delfino/Bell, Meeks, Ridnour off the bench. I would prefer Skiles commit to his starters but keep a little flexibility to with his guards to play Ridnour or Meeks longer depending on the matchups. I would love to see Redd come in with the second team like Ginobli, but if we start Moute we need Redd’s offense, and if Warrick comes in off the bench we cant risk having Redd and Warrick on the court at the same time. As much as I like Charlie Bell why not give Meeks a chance to be the backup 2 guard? Last night he stole a ball and went for a layup, how often has that happened? Thanks for letting me share my thoughts!

by 

















