Brew Hoop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Has Kentucky Improved Since the Non-Conference Season?

Caponomics: A Financial Guide to the Summer

UPDATE: We first published this about a month ago, but it's now been updated to reflect the past few weeks' activity.  Long story short: the Bucks do have some flexibility under the luxury tax (about $7.5 million if the threshold comes in at $71 million), but they're not out of the woods yet.  Pay close attention to where the final 09/10 cap figures are when they are released on Tuesday/Wednesday.  At $71 million the Bucks can probably re-sign Sessions (or someone else, like Josh Childress) for up to an MLE deal and get Ilyasova as well; at $69 million it becomes distinctively tougher to do both.

Star-divide

It's hard to speculate about the Bucks' summer plans without looking at their current cap situation, so to simplify things I've uploaded a file that you can view here...or just look below.  We'll place a permanent link to this page on the left under "Bucks Cap Info" and keep it updated from here on out.

Most of the information is just pulled from Sham Sports' excellent salary databse. Information on minimum salaries is from Larry Coon's incomparable CBA FAQ and the 2009 first rounder salary number I got by multiplying 120% times the rookie scale figure for that slot as listed at the NBA Players' Association website.

In the "default" scenario above I've zero'ed out both Ramon Sessions' and Ersan Ilyasova's cap figures so that you can see in blue at the bottom the amount of money available to sign them (and anyone else) without going over the tax.  However, there are some key assumptions that go into the number, namely:

1) The rookies get standard dealsBrandon Jennings' salary is based on the Bucks signing him to 120% of his scale number, which has effectively become the standard practice for first rounders.  For Jodie Meeks, I assumed the standard two year rookie minimum deal.  Teams can offer more than the minimum and use part of their MLE to sign second rounders, which is what the Bucks did last year in giving Luc Richard Mbah a Moute more money up front in exchange for a third year at the minimum.  That's looking like a very smart move at this point.

2) I assumed the tax comes in at $71 million, but it could definitely be lower.  While there were some fears that the luxury tax threshold could fall below $70 million, recent suggestions are that it should stay very close to the $71.15 million figure we had this year.  This is probably the most important variable in all of this, but we won't know where the level will be until the new cap numbers are announced in July.  The range of numbers that have been thrown around are anywhere from $68 to $71 million, and given the Bucks' situation that kind of swing is a big deal.  For instance, using the lower figure and the other assumptions I've outlined, the Bucks would essentially have zero space under the tax to sign any free agents.

4) Bruce Bowen gets cut while Kurt Thomas sticks around.  Bowen's $4.1 million deal is only 50% guaranteed if he's waived by August 1, so I assumed the Bucks take advantage of that and cut him loose.  It's possible he's traded or even kept for depth, but from the perspective of free agent flexibility, I thought it would be helpful to assume he's cut and only $2.05 million counts against the Bucks' cap.

Thomas' $3.8 million deal is guaranteed, but there's a distinct possibility he gets traded or even bought out for a smaller amount.  Thomas wouldn't have too much trouble latching on with a contender for a veteran minimum deal, which would be about $1.306 million.  So hypothetically he could get bought out and the Bucks could save around that amount on their cap number.  However, he certainly has value as a savvy vet who can defend both big spots, rebound at a high rate, and clean up garbage in the paint.  Considering the Bucks' depth up front, that would no doubt be of use, while also making him an appealing trade target.

5) Amir Johnson's trade kicker is $275k.  Sham ($4.217 million) and Storytellers ($3.947 million) have different salary figures for Johnson, apparently because of how much they're figuring for his trade kicker.  I'll go with the more conservative estimate for now, but that could change.

0 recs  |  Comment 12 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Brew Hoop

Game 50: Pistons/Bucks

Feb 2010 by Frank Madden - 59 comments

Recap: Bucks 97, Heat 81

Feb 2010 by Frank Madden - 4 comments

Game 45: Heat/Bucks

Jan 2010 by Frank Madden - 57 comments

Comments

Display:

This is fantastic

for two reasons. One, it’s an incredibly simple way to visualize an incredibly complex topic. Two, it shows how grossly overpaid Danny G and Charlie Bell are, especially when LRMaM is getting paid a fraction of their contracts for being arguably the third best player on the team.

"I'm so clean, cats think I sip Ajax."

by Mitchell_M on May 4, 2009 6:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You know, I think Allen would actually make a pretty good coach. He strikes me as a smart player, he’s just very limited. I doubt he’d want to retire at age 30 unfortunately.

Great news if the tax stays put. We can almost sign our picks AND Sessions (or maybe we can for sure?) as is…if we can just shave off a couple million in trading Jefferson or Ridnour, we might even be able to bring back Ersan.

by richardhkirkando on May 5, 2009 7:04 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

How about Gadzuric and the lottery pick to a team below the cap? While taking back no salary in the exchange.

That would save around $9mil. Then use that money to hold onto Charlie V and Sessions. If you feel those two are going to be better than the lottery pick, that could be a good deal.

by NBR on May 6, 2009 6:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Last year the word was they really wanted to move their first rounder, but for whatever reason now it seems like the opposite is true. Personally, I hate losing picks because they’re the only way you can get impact players on the cheap (have to be lucky obviously), but the current situation is pretty unique given the Bucks have two young players as RFAs.

I’d rather try to move Ridnour or Alexander and hope you can somehow free up a couple million by acquiring a guy who’s non-guaranteed. If you can do that then you can probably bring back Sessions at least…I just don’t see the Bucks liking Villanueva’s style enough to make a concerted effort to bring him back.

by Frank Madden on May 6, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

From what I’ve gathered, it looks as though Hammond will try to sell the pick straight up for cash. He’s hinted at it a few times. While I can’t entirely blame him in this draft, it’s usually the sign of a G.M. who can’t get value out of his moves (see Steve Kerr).

by MadTown Hoops on May 7, 2009 11:48 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

“This is as important as anything,” Hammond said recently. “For us moving forward, we have to get a good player this year.”

“We’ll get someone good there,” Hammond said of the No. 10 slot. "We’ve been around together now for a year, and I think we’ll do a better job in this draft. Having Scott Skiles as our coach now for a year, I think he knows more about us, we know more about him even.

“We want him to be a part of this process. It’s a player we want him to like, along with us. It’s a player that needs to be on the floor and helping us win games next year.”

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/bucks/44032802.html

That was from a couple weeks ago in the JS. maybe he’s just doing a crappy job of managing fan expectations, but it just doesn’t make sense to talk about the quality of the players in the draft like that if he’s hoping to sell it off. Earlier this year he did talk about draft picks being means of shedding salary, so I do think that was in line with selling the pick or using it as sweetener to dump a salary or whatever. But it does seem like their tune has changed a bit.

by Frank Madden on May 7, 2009 1:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Selling picks

Might the Bucks be interested to sell their #10 pick (provided they don’t move up in the lottery) to my Blazers for say $3 million, our 2009 #24 pick (or our 2010 first round pick), a 2009 second round pick (say #38 Knicks that we have), and we absorb Elson/Allen with our trade exception from the Diogu/Ruffin trade last deadline?

Would that help to stay under the luxury tax, provide adequate value, and still re-sign Session + Villanueva?

by Norsktroll on May 8, 2009 2:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's very interesting

I’d say anything that allows us to clear salary has to be on the table, and in this draft moving down 14 spots might not be the biggest deal. I’m not an expert on this crop of talent, but there does seem to be a lack of excitement about the guys in the latter half of the lottery. I imagine the Bucks’ willingness to do this kind of deal comes down to three things:

a) Whether they see a significant gap between 10 and 24
b) Whether they think they can get a contributor from the second round (drafting Mbah a Moute last year might give them added confidence)
c) How confident they are that they can deal Ridnour for either some space or help at another position. In a perfect world they would have dealt him for an expiring deal at the deadline, but now the options for getting an NG’ed guy that they can cut to clear space are obviously much lower.

One issue: I’m pretty sure Elson and Allen don’t have to decide on their player options until the end of June, ie after the draft. So you wouldn’t officially be able to trade them before the draft. I suppose you could do have the Blazers pick for the Bucks and vice versa on the condition that Elson/Allen take their POs and the trade goes through after the moratorium. Still, it’s a bit tricky, and eyeballing it I don’t see them having the dollars to get both CV and Ramon anyway.

Can we just give you Ridnour and #10 for #24 and forget about the cash? This would be predicated on you guys having cap space and then waiting until July to officially make the deal. You’d then have eight point guards, but…

by Frank Madden on May 9, 2009 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Blazers would have cap space if they don’t tender a qualifying offer to Channing Frye (which is likely since his new salary respectively cap hold would be bigger than what he is really worth to us right now), or renounce the rights to the not guaranteed contracts of Steve Blake and/or Travis Outlaw (each ca. $4 million, but highly unlikely). If they let Frye go for nothing, they would have about $6.7 million in cap space of course depending on where exactly the cap will be.

I could see them do quite a few things to try moving up to get DeJuan Blair since we need a PF backup who is a banger. Or one of the better point guards in the draft like Lawson or Curry, though that is risky to add yet another potential PG project. In a dream world, they would move up to get Rubio, but that of course is extremely unlikely and a much larger deal. And a popular scenario discussed is using the cap space to do a lopsided deal centered around Blake for Hinrich with the Bulls.

Ridnour seems like a player coach McMillan wouldn’t say no to if he could add him to the chart if that is what it takes to get a really nice pick, but it’s hardly the guy to lead the team into the future competing in the playoffs… The picture of potential trading partners should get clearer after the lottery is over.

by Norsktroll on May 9, 2009 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

15 Players Under Contract

If Elson and Allen exercise their options then the Bucks will have 15 (the limit) under contract for 2009-10 excluding Sessions and Illyasova.

So if they excercise their options then the Bucks are stuck without being able to add anyone, including Sessions and/or Illyasovea unless they dump somoeone and it has to be one for one.

Stay tuned

by Buddahfan on Jul 6, 2009 2:18 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Yep, Elson/Allen took their options

The table above says 14 total player because I assume Bowen will be cut to open up more dollars. Aside from trades, you could further buyout Thomas to get down to 13. That would then get you to enough space for both Sessions and Ilyasova.

I’m guessing they delay the signing of Meeks to keep a spot open for Sessions should they need to match an offer. But Luc signed before summer league last year, so that’s not for certain.

by Frank Madden on Jul 6, 2009 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

New Cap and LTT

The cap for this coming year is $57.7 and the LTT $69.9.

I believe that:

If a player is released then the amount of his guaranteed salary goes against the team’s total unless that player signs with someone else.

If a buyout is negotitated than the amount of the buyout goes against the team’s salary.

So if Bowen and Thomas are released or bought out 2 more contract slots will be opened. However, as the to the amount of salary toward the LTT that would come of the Bucks books that is unknown at this time but would most likely could drop by $3 to $4 to around $60 million which is a couple of a million over the Salary Cap amount of about $58 million.

I believe that would leave about $10 million available without going over the LTT pending other player movement.

by Buddahfan on Jul 7, 2009 10:46 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.
Start posting about the Bucks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Multimedia_cropped_small
Thinking Value Going Forward
Small
Realistic Ways to Improve the Bucks
Bucks_small
Home and Away
Bucks_small
Quality Wins and Bad Losses
Small
Stupid horns / fans using them should be ejected.
D79f2103cbc6f33ad50a237cf3b2b113-getty-83010328sd016_washington_wi_small
Now is the Time to Make a Move
Bj3_small
Bucks mid season report card.
Cards_vs_royals_small
Eastern Conference All-Stars...
Bucks_small
The Bucks High Five
Bucks_small
How I became a Bucks fan.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Brewhoop_small Frank Madden

Brewhoop_small Alex Boeder