Brandon Jennings: A True NBA Enigma
So I have been reading about our new point guard. One thing that can be said for him: he says all the right things. He has been an elite prospect for long enough that he has learned to craft an intriguing narrative. It is centered on his becoming a man overseas, overcoming adversity and cultural barriers all while learning a team centric version of basketball. He talks defense and doing what is necessary to help the team win. It all goes down smooth for Bucks fans weary of the histrionics and selfishness of past floor generals.
But how is he in real life?
The Journal Sentinel has much good to say about Jennings and he says a lot that's good to print. If this team makes the playoffs as an eighth seed, I bet he makes a guarantee.
"I've learned it's not about money; it's about a team basketball game," Jennings said. "If you're losing, you might have a riot out there or some angry people out there. Now I have it in my head I'm just about winning and helping the team."
It sounds good. Maybe the kid gets it. Reading it you start to feel confident in Jennings, in the Bucks, even in yourself, for being a Bucks fan and seeing the dark times through. But it feels like the JS' interest dropped off and they are still working off his high school resumé. Has anyone seen this kid play?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twl2F5iB7sA
According to some, this is Jennings' best game. He certainly looks like a high school prospect in this setting. He holds his own handle wise, but the only shot he looks for is his own, and it's messed up. During the draft I think someone said it was broken. Hopefully Bill Peterson can work another miracle.
No real conclusions can ever be made from a smattering of youtube clips, but still I'm not sure quite what I see here. Jennings seems a lot like a shooting guard in a point's body. He loves the perimeter, but I don't know if distributor is really in his genes. Who knows? Skiles might be able to teach him a few things and again Peterson has developed some of the better points in this league. Maybe. In any case, he'll be raw like most 19 year olds, so we should definitely re-sign Sessions. We'll see what happens.
FanPosts are user-generated blogs-within-the-blog. We ask that members abide by our community guidelines and keep things respectable. Thanks.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Sessions really is your best option at PG.
Jennings might overtake him someday, but that doesn’t mean you give the keys to him just yet. Sessions is already good. Maybe not great, but certainly good. For a second round draft pick, that’s gold. I suppose if someone really wants to over pay him, Jennings and Ridnour could fight it out, but Jennings is a prospect for a reason. He may be really good, but he’s got a lot of growing to get there. Of course, you can say that about nearly every player taken in this draft.
A lot of Blazer fans want Sessions (see fanpost below this one) but I think he’s a better fit with the Bucks than the Blazers. You already have players that mesh with his strengths and can fill his deficiencies. If the cost is reasonable, I’d keep him. It’s not like he’s going to lose much value if Jennings does end up beating him out for the starting position.
μὴ φοβοῦ, μόνον πίστευε.
...And We Have Our First Controversy
So, a candid interview in which Brandon Jennings talks trash and uses the entire dictionary has started making the rounds. It might not be much, but controversy has surrounded this kid since his early days as an elite prospect. Awesome.
Right now I’m at 50/50 with Jennings. I’ll give him a chance, but I’m worried about his ability to contain his ego. Every time something like this comes up or somebody mentions Skiles’ past relationships with players that are all flash and no sizzle I start to worry. Is there an impending explosion that I am doomed to watch, helplessly and in slow motion? This pick could make or break the team.
He could be a restricted free agent after four years and, if he takes the QO, unrestricted after five. In other words, the Bucks can have him for quite some time if they want him.
by Frank Madden on Jul 5, 2009 12:36 AM CDT up reply actions

by 

















