Newsday: Knicks not offering Sessions anything for now
If you've been following the Ramon Sessions situation, then you a) are sick of hearing about it and b) know that Alan Hahn at Newsday has been outspoken about his expectation that Sessions ends up in Knick uniform.
So it seems rather significant that Hahn now reports that the Knicks do not in fact have a standing offer to Sessions, and are unlikely to make one unless they can clear 2010 cap room via a trade of Jared Jeffries or Eddy Curry. And that doesn't seem likely unless the Knicks are willing to give up major talent to do so.
Sessions can always just take his $1 million qualifying offer, but he probably isn't too keen on joining the PG logjam in Milwaukee, and in that scenario he'd just be a RFA again next summer (albeit without Arenas restrictions on his first year salary). If the Knicks pull out of the race, it will be interesting to see if any darkhorse teams--Clips? OKC?--emerge with more modest multiyear deals to see if they can swing a bargain.
Update: As BR noted in the comments, though Sessions can't sign a one-year deal with a team other than the Bucks, my understanding is the Knicks don't have to fully guarantee a second year. In that scenario, New York could offer Sessions more money than the Bucks this year, a clear chance to start and put up good numbers, and the chance to be an unrestricted free agent (albeit without Bird rights) next summer if the Knicks let him go. I doubt Sessions would jump at that kind of deal, but at this point it would seem obvious he's not getting the multi-year MLE deal he had his hopes set on.
6 months ago
Frank Madden
7 comments
0 recs |
Comments
hahaha
shocking.
Chubby had better hope his 3rd mystery team starts existing.
by richardhkirkando on Aug 26, 2009 7:04 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Sessions best deal is this....
Can anyone tell me why Sessions doesn’t sign a 2-year deal here with the 2nd year unguaranteed? That meets the requirement of more than 1-year deal of RFA status and would allow Walsh the cap space in 2010 if needed. I think this is a good deal for Sessions so he can put up monster numbers for the Knicks and then hit free agency. If he signs the QO, he will still be a restricted free agent after next season.
Sign QO=1 million, then restricted free agency…..
Sign with the Knicks=4 million, then either unrestricted or 3.68 million.
It will be hard for Sessions to get 6.68 million during the summer on 2010 with the numbers he will put up with the Bucks….I mean, how much time will they give him anyways? Sucks for Sessions, but he has to take the Knicks deal that has no guaranteed dollars for 2010….
by Bellringer21 on Aug 26, 2009 7:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that makes sense
Put a note in the original post about it…
by Frank Madden on Aug 26, 2009 8:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bucks and Clippers have serious talks
How about a sign and trade? Sessions and Alexander for Camby.
by Seattle Bucks on Aug 26, 2009 1:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It’s really hard to do a Sessions S/T with the Clips now that they lost most of their trade exception acquiring Butler (the Sessions BYC issues as usual). So you couldn’t do that deal, and it would put you way over the luxury tax if you could. You’d have to send them a big contract like Gadz to make something involving Camby work, and I’m not sure why they’d do that.
And that gets to another problem—the only reason to do a S/T is if the Clips have someone they want to give away and the Bucks actually want him. Otherwise LA just signs Sessions outright. I’m not sure why they’d give us anything of real value without dumping bad salary, and I’m guessing the Bucks would rather let Sessions walk than do that.
by Frank Madden on Aug 27, 2009 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are we that desperate to see Ramonster go? It’s not like Donnie Walsh cruises the net looking for ideas, but why are we actively seeking ways to show Memo the door? It seems like in any other situation, with any other coach, this year would be ideal for the team holding the rights to match. Not only is Sessions young, talented and well liked by the fanbase, but he’s strangely unwanted by the rest of the league due to the economy.
John Hammond has said he likes to see competition at every position, yet he seems to not want the very player who would be his best point next year. If this is some elaborate strategy to devalue Sessions because of the state of things, then Hammond is a better strategist than I could have possibly imagined from the rest of his resumé. But if this is mere hubris and he just wants to see a guy he picked/traded for start at the one, then the next few winters will be long and cold in the Brew City.
by MadTown Hoops on Aug 26, 2009 7:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
A different angle ...
Look at it this way, if the knicks offer Ramon a 2 year deal with the second year not gauranteed, this would be a perfect contract from the Bucks’ perspective; the Bucks have the upper hand here given they can match any offer. Though the first year would put them over the limit, Hammond could perhaps be planning more trades this summer or before the deadline next year. All I’m trying to say is, we really have no idea what Hammond is thinking and it seems that no NBA insider does as well. Though I doubt my own analysis here, as I also feel Ramon will not be playing in Milwaukee next year, it seems like Hammond’s tactics have been working in Milwaukee’s favor so far and likely has a strategy we (and the rest of the NBA world) are unware of.
by BigO1 on Aug 27, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs















