Recap: Raptors 101, Bucks 96
Two days after watching Chris Bosh's one-man show come up short in Milwaukee, you'd have thought that holding down Bosh (17 pts, 6/13 fg) and forcing Jarrett Jack and Marco Belinelli to beat you would be a sure way to steal one in Toronto (combined points on Wednesday: 6) . One problem: never underestimate the Bucks' ability to lose road games. Don't get me wrong, they have generally taken care of business against the really bad teams, which is nice. But against decent to good teams? Not so much.
Which is a shame, because in Toronto they had a golden opportunity to beat a fellow Eastern playoff hopeful for the second time in three days. A back-and-forth first quarter saw Bogut's eight points overshadowed by a balanced Raptor attack that included Jose Calderon's 40-foot heave to beat the buzzer and break a 25-25 tie. But the Bucks re-seized the momentum immediately, starting the second with a 12-0 run highlighted by eight points from a frisky-looking Jerry Stackhouse (3/3 fg, 2/2 ft). Nothing ferocious, but Stackhouse looked at ease catching on the block, facing up and burying mid-range jumpers--a little reminiscent of Richard Jefferson a year ago, especially when he's wearing Jefferson's old #24. Bogut then took over with nine in the final five minutes--including 5/5 on free throws--to help the Bucks take an encouraging 57-48 into the half.
The third quarter saw both teams make runs, the Bucks answering an 8-0 Toronto run to start the period with a 12-2 run of their own. The Bucks continued to show a 2/3 zone that they've had some success with over the past week, but the Raptors gave the Bucks a dose of their own medicine in the fourth. Toronto's zone clearly threw them off kilter, as it starved Bogut (1/3 fg in the period) of touches and challenged the Bucks' struggling jump shooters to beat them from the outside. Ridnour was the only one up for the challenge, hitting 6/7 fg and scoring 18 of the Bucks' 23 points in the final eight minutes.
But as the Bucks nervously tried to pass around the Toronto zone, the Raps were intent on attacking, running repeatedly off rebounds and turnovers and catching the Bucks flat-footed--much to the delight of the Toronto faithful. Jarrett Jack dueled Ridnour shot-for-shot, scoring 13 of his 27 points in the period and keying a 13-0 run that turned an 87-81 Bucks lead with 5:01 remaining to a 94-87 deficit with 37 seconds remaining. Ridnour buried a couple more big shots to give the Bucks a sliver of hope, but the Raps made their freebies and the Bucks were never within one possession.
The Bucks' complete inability to score down the stretch was perhaps a bit ironic given how easily the Bucks (even without Bogut) closed out the Raptors on Wednesday, but perhaps that's just the universe evening itself out. This time around they had more to focus on than just Bosh, as Jack put on an efficiency clinic with his 27 pts coming on just nine shots and Belinelli scoring 16 off the bench.
Three Bucks
Luke Ridnour: 23 min, 27 pts, 9/13 fg, 3/6 threes, 6/6 ft, 4 ast, 0 to
Ridnour ended up with a team-worst -14, but it couldn't have been less representative of his contribution tonight. His now-standard hot shooting helped the Bucks turn around a first quarter deficit and his scorching fourth quarter gave the Bucks' sinking ship a chance down the stretch.
Andrew Bogut: 37 min, 22 pts, 8/13 fg, 6/7 ft, 6 rebs, 3 ast, 3 blk, 0 to
With Andrea Bargnani sitting out, Bogut was facing a better defender in Rasho Nesterovic much of the night but never seemed too bothered. Though his eight game streak of 11+ rebound games his over, he continued to score with ease and now has five straight games with 3+ blocks. The biggest problem was getting him the ball, as the Raptors zone threw the Bucks for a loop.
Brandon Jennings: 32 min, 14 pts, 5/15 fg, 3 reb, 2 ast, 3 stl, 2 to
Not much to choose from after Ridnour and Bogut, but let's talk about the rookie for a moment. I'm not one to make excuses for Jennings, but I honestly thought he was a lot better than his numbers indicated; his distribution was good and he had a number of sweet drives to the hoop, even though he was a non-factor down the stretch. But the numbers don't lie entirely--5/15 isn't a good thing any way you slice it, and Jack clearly outplayed him.
Three Numbers
+22. The Raptors absolutely wrecked the Bucks in transition, outscoring them 27-5 and running effectively off both rebounds and turnovers.
45-39. Two days after gathering 17 offensive boards in Milwaukee, the Bucks were outrebound 45-39 and notched just six offensive boards at the Air Canada Center. Needless to say, you can't afford to let a team like the Raps outrebound you, especially when your own shot isn't falling (see next shot).
19.2%. The Bucks' recent hot shooting from deep didn't continue tonight, as they made just 5/26 threes--and Bucks not named Ridnour made just 2/20. That was especially problematic since it allowed the Raptors to go zone without much fear of being made to pay for it.
Three Good
Luke's 4th. Jennings is supposed to be the Bucks' streaky scorer, but Ridnour was the one who went all Sleepy Floyd in the final eight minutes, dropping 18 points and giving the struggling Bucks a fighting chance.
Bogut on the block. It was a bit worrying to see Bogut's fg% drop below 50% this month, but he's looked back in form the past two games with a combined 19/27 shooting and 24.5 ppg.
Bench boost. Belinelli helped even things up a bit in the end, but Ridnour's fourth and Stackhouse's second highlighted another encouraging outing from the Bucks' reserves, who notched 42 points on 15/24 (62.5%) shooting. The one surprise? With Mbah a Moute in the Bucks' smaller starting lineup, Ilyasova got 22 minutes and Hakim Warrick followed up his four minute cameo on Wednesday with a DNP-CD--his first of the season..
Three Bad
Finish. The Bucks actually won just a single quarter (the 32-20 second), but for most of the night they seemed capable of weathering every run the Raptors could throw at them. Then, the bottom gave out as they watched Toronto rip off 13 straight points.
Brick City. Bucks not named Bogut or Ridnour shot an ugly 18-53, reminding us of the Bucks we saw for much of the last road trip. Combine that with just six offensive rebounds and it's no surprise the Bucks couldn't hang on.
Aggression. The Raptors are the league's worst defensive team and among the league's worst in rebounding as well, so it was disappointing to see the Bucks so thrown by the Raps' defense in the fourth and beaten to so many loose balls all night.
0 recs |
9 comments
| Add comment
|
Comments
The Number That Matters to Me : Zero
That’s the number of minutes that Jodie Meeks has received since the Bucks signed Jerry Stackhouse. Best case scenario Stack is alright, but in no case is he such a contributor that it is worth it to lose time for our future.
Few Bucks fans care about this season in a capsule. If we make the playoffs, there is little hope of advancing. We need to build this team and we are not going to get where we need to be if ancient, irrelevant veterans eat up our bench time.
by MadTown Hoops on Jan 23, 2010 5:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Stackhouse-Meeks
With Redd exiled from this team, I actually like having Stackhouse on the team, especially for Meeks and Jennings. Stackhouse has always seemed to be a class act of an athlete. Even if Meeks is relegated to “DND-Coach” status for the majority of this year, he will continue to show up in the gym after the games to work on his game. And if we make the playoffs, it can only help in the maturation process of our young Bucks. Once they get the taste, they’ll get the hunger. And one can only hope that they will never be able to quench the hunger, like Charlie and Sweet Dee in “It’s Always Sunny…” with their ringworm.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
by ILuvDaBush on Jan 23, 2010 10:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I just read the craziest rumor on Hoopshype. It was saying that Redd was disheartened by his latest results and he wonders if he’ll be able to play again. So, umm, what happens if Redd retires at the end of this season?
by MadTown Hoops on Jan 23, 2010 6:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Redd Retirement
No matter what, he will invoke his player option for next year. But if he never suits up again, in terms of his contract, 80% of his contract would be covered next year by insurance and we would have a very easy time moving the contract (or Herb finally realizes a profit, could go either way).
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
by ILuvDaBush on Jan 23, 2010 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
retirement
Yes, they’d have 80% of Redd’s $18.3 million paid for he doesn’t play next year—$14.64 million. Still counts against the cap if a guy is injured, though if he medically retires it’s treated slightly differently:
http://members.cox.net/lmcoon/salarycap.htm#Q54
If Redd’s knee is toast and a league-approved doctor confirms he can’t play again, then the Bucks can apply to the NBA to have his deal wiped off the books for cap purposes, but they would have to wait a year from when the injury happened (ie next January) to do so.
By my reading of the rule, the real benefit of the provision is when you have a player with a longer deal—the Bucks wouldn’t be able to get cap space next summer through this rule, and Redd’s deal would be off the books by the following summer anyway. So the only obvious benefit would be if the Bucks added a bunch of salary and needed Redd’s deal off the books to avoid the luxury tax—probably not relevant unless they used their expiring deals to acquire long-term salary in the next month and then used the MLE this summer.
by Frank Madden on Jan 23, 2010 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Medical retirement
That was what got Darius Miles into the headlines last year wasn’t it?
by TheJay on Jan 23, 2010 4:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
If you come back after getting medical retirement then the contract (assuming it’s still paying out) goes back on the books of the original team…hence the Blazers were freaking out since they were relying on that deal no longer counting against their cap space. But if Redd medically retired and came back after the summer of 2011 it wouldn’t matter, since his contract would have run out anyway.
Long story short, I don’t think that option is going to have a real effect in this situation.
by Frank Madden on Jan 24, 2010 12:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ridnour's trade value
What are the top-5 teams we could trade our Rainbow Warrior (loved the shout-out in a previous recap)?
Immediately, the Lakers come to mind. They don’t have much in terms of assets that would match up well (Farmar and Walton? No gracias) but they have an obvious need. The Trailblazers come to mind because of Ridnour’s Oregon roots and the fact that they have beaucoup assets (Batum and Pendergraph? Por favor) but also that pesky presence of Miller/Blake. The 76ers have a definite need if they intend to make a stretch run (or….and this may seem a bit ludicrous….we could take their Brand contract off their hands. Redd/Ersan/Ridnour for Brand/Jrue/conract….Ayy Carumba galore). Charlotte (and more importantly mercenary coah Larry Brown) would probably jump at the chance to acquire Ridnour (Ridnour/Danny Gadz for Tyson Chandler at the 4?). What are some other teams and what would be your top 5? Obviously he has some value, especially with a league bereft of facillitating PG’s with his fiery shot of late.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
by ILuvDaBush on Jan 23, 2010 10:23 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure how salaries would match up...
…cos I’m too lazy to check, and not that I want Frodo to go as he is an exceptional back-up for BJ3, but what about Luke/Gadz or Hakim for The Matrix? Would make a much more formidable front court, despite Marion’s gradual decline. Not sure if the Mavs would go for it tho…
Said Bucks maybe to the Lakers for LO? Once more, some extra beef on frontline would be handy.
What about Camby?
Like I said, purely pipe dreams with no attempt made whatsoever at researching salary, chemistry oir anything else of relevence!
by Big Crazy Dave on Jan 24, 2010 9:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Something to say? Choose one of these options to log in.
On Facebook? Use Connect to join SB Nation. Share insights with fans and friends.- » Create a new SB Nation account
- » Already registered with SB Nation? Log in!

by 














