Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Animated GIFs Of January

Recap: Bucks 95, Heat 84

100_1851_medium

Box Score

MILWAUKEE -- There is a new guard in town.

By the time Dwyane Wade led Marquette to the Final Four in 2003, this city had fully embraced the Chicagoan as one of their own. A couple years later in 2005, the Bucks locked up Michael Redd to a six-year, $91 million deal. The next year, in 2006, Wade won Finals MVP. And in 2007, Milwaukee finished 28-54, as many Bucks fans increasingly pinned the franchise's troubles quite personally on Redd, as though Mike shouldn't have accepted the team's offer to pay him copious amounts of money. Meanwhile, Wade remained on a firm trajectory toward all-time great status, and he remained revered by basketball fans (not just Bucks fans) throughout many corners of Milwaukee.

Fast forward a few more years to tonight, and the sold-out Bradley Center is filled, but Redd is out for the season (again), and Wade is still in the hearts of plenty Milwaukeeans judging by the pregame introductions.

But for the next two hours and 11 minutes, a new guard outplayed and defeated the old(er) guard, eventually scoring the final six blows to lead Milwaukee to its sixth straight in Milwaukee.

City: In Brandon you should trust.

Star-divide

Three Bucks

Andrew Bogut. The Bucks won this game by halftime, and while it's not what the lede reads, that was because Bogut owned the painted area, owned Jermaine O'Neal, and he owned the night by that time.

We referenced the positive correlation between Andrew's increased production and number of days of rest this season in the pregame notes. Bogut was best on two days of rest coming into the game, and he certainly was the best on two days of rest tonight.

He scored eight points in the final four minutes of the team's dynamite second quarter, when they effectively pulled far enough away so that Miami could not come back.

The future All-Star (not in a couple weeks, probably within a couple years) also made the paint an unwelcome place for opponents in the first half, blocking four shots as the Bucks held Miami to 39 going into halftime.

Bogut tied a season-high with six offensive boards, and totaled 17 points on 6-11 shooting with 15 rebounds, two steals, and four blocks for the night. And 5-6 at the stripe.

A richly deserved +14 differential for the Aussie.

Hakim Warrick. Despite an energetic and effective start to the month, Warrick entered tonight having played just 31 minutes combined in the previous five games. Somehow, just six minutes per night on average in those last five.

Tonight he was sixth man extraordinaire, filling up the basket on a mix of those awkward-looking but occasionally (tonight was an occasion) effective jumpers and put-ins around the hoop, filling up the stat sheet with a team-high 22 points along with six rebounds.

He also carried the team offensively in the fourth quarter with 10 points, enabling Milwaukee to stifle a late comeback attempt by the Heat, who drew within single digits after trailing big for most of the game.

Among Hak's highlights was a reverse two-hand jam in the second quarter on a nice, long pass from Brandon Jennings. Yes, they were the correct NBA Jam duo answer.

Carlos Delfino. Another terrific game by the Argentine, who may or may not have been spurred on by a youngster sporting a Leo Messi jersey sitting courtside.

In the past two weeks, Delfino has played well in the wins, he's played well in the losses, he's just played very well. You couldn't keep Carlos off the floor, as he led everyone with 40 minutes of scoring (16 points), defending (nice job on Dwyane), rebounding (seven tonight, averaging 8.3 boards in last eight games), and dunking (a rarity on this team in transition).

Three Numbers

81.6 % After his 5-6 night at the line, Andrew Bogut has now made 31-38 (.816) at the stripe over the last six games. Just in case Frank didn't jinx him already.

91. Just 91 possessions in the game, just the type of crawling pace Miami prefers. The Heat entered the game averaging 90.7 possessions per game, making them the third slowest team in the NBA.

Still Milwaukee adjusted just fine, and while the pick and roll wasn't working with great success, they moved the ball quickly, and attacked the hoop. The Bucks converted 15-27 at the rim compared to 9-20 for the Heat. The Bucks also made 20-25 free throws.

8. He didn't make it in Three Good or Three Bucks, but Jerry Stackouse was a very Good Buck in the second quarter. Stack totaled eight points, two rebounds, and two assists, and played an instrumental role during the quarter in which the Bucks won the game, the only quarter that either team really seperated themselves at all.

Three Good

D. Wade. Not as in D. Wade the "nickname." I'm writing about the D on Dwyane.

Charlie Bell did a fine job staying in front of the shiftiest of shifty players in the league. And when I type "fine," I don't mean fair, I mean really swell. Carlos Delfino, too, was good when individually matched up. Moreover, the double teams came at the right times, and it's always a team effort when facing someone of Wade's caliber.

They didn't shut him down, but they also didn't let Wade win the game. That is tantamount to not letting the Heat win the game. Seriously, the Heat haven't won a game in which Wade didn't lead them in scoring in a month and a half.

And while he led Miami's way with 21 points, that is down from his season average by half a dozen, and he needed a lot of shots (6-20 shooting) to get even that many. He got to the line plenty (and when I say plenty, I mean he got more than enough calls from the refs despite complaining enough to pick up a technical) where he made 9-12, but the team's aggressive defense also contributed to Wade firing away from outside (0-6) despite not much historical success on threes.

I completely subscribe to the school of thought that a superstar player's offensive performance depends (a lot) more on the superstar than on the defense. So does Skiles:

We did a pretty good job on him, but also there were some shots maybe he would normally make. So you never take too much credit when you're playing against a guy who's that good.

But still, a superstar won't struggle so much without good defense either. Ultimately, you need both the player to personally struggle a bit and the good defense. So while Bell didn't make Three Bucks, he was awfully good defending Wade (so was Delfino), and Charlie chipped in offensively 11 points on 3-6 shooting and didn't turn the ball over in 33 minutes.

Loud crowd. Saturday nights always lend an attendance boost, and that coupled with a return to Milwaukee of guard Rafer Alston Dwyane Wade assured a sellout crowd of 18,717.

The atmosphere was fairly festive and loud, and the Bucks gave them a lot to cheer about, just as they have all month, and all season long, really.

Milwaukee finished the month a spotless 6-0 at the Bradley Center, where they haven't lost since the day after Christmas to San Antonio, and where they might just not lose ever again.

Encore. The Bucks get another shot at the Heat on Monday. Granted, the game is in Miami, but the Heat aren't much better at home than away, and the Bucks clearly match up very nicely regardless of venue.

And while they started the night seeded sixth in the East, the Heat are conceivably the most catchable team in the playoff race. And yes, the Stackhouse pickup was made with a run to the playoffs in mind. Whereas the Bobcats and Bulls are balanced clubs now starting to realize their potential, Miami appears vulnerable.

Wade should be good great enough to secure a playoff spot the top-heavy East, but there isn't much room for error on a team that relies so heavily on a single player. They certainly couldn't withstand an injury to Wade, and as we saw tonight, they aren't in very good shape without Michael Beasley, who missed the game with a hyperextended knee. That turned Joel Anthony into a starter, not promising stuff for a team that starts Rafer Alston at point guard.

Milwaukee is three games behind Miami after this win, so another win on Monday would draw them very much within striking distance. Particularly since after the rematch, Miami then plays: at Boston, at Cleveland, at Chicago, vs Houston, at Atlanta.

Three Bad

D. Wade. As in D. Wade. A lot of superstar performances from superstar players at the BC this season: Dirk, Kobe, Duncan, and Bosh come to mind, but not Wade this time. He came into the game averaging 23.4 points on a robust 51.4 % shooting in 16 career games against the Bucks, so maybe he was just due for an off-game.

But I didn't much care for how he carried himself either. He complained to the refs early and often, eventually resulting in a third-quarter technical for dissent. And it's not like he wasn't getting calls. On the contrary, Wade shot 12 free throws, and got the benefit of a couple questionable ones, eliciting a "special treatment" chant from Squad 6 in the second half while at the line.

PF Starters. Jeremy at Bucksketball asked before the game if there has been a worse starting matchup all year than between the starting power forwards tonight, and Luc Mbah a Moute and Joel Anthony answered that question in resounding fashion by scoring a combined zero points.

Skiles, post-game, on Luc:

I didn't like his energy. I think something happened to him this morning in the shootaround or something. He was complaining about something, I'm not sure what it was. I just didn't think he was moving around that well today.

And while you may worry away, I don't think this is a big deal.

Luke Ridnour shows rare sign of imperfection. That, is news. 0-4, no points.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Low-intensity defense makes us look good...

The first half was fun to watch what with the Bucks showing a lot of variety and teamwork in building their lead. The in the second half the magic went away. Miami played better defense, and our offense featured missed shots and turnovers. Luckily, the Heat were nothing special and we won. Thanks largely, IMO, to some low-percentage shots that went in for us.

I have to keep reminding myself that when our offense looks really sharp, it’s likely because the opposition isn’t doing the job. More than it is that we’re developing as a team.

Does seem the team can learn some things from Stackhouse. Does seem Luc Mbah a Moute’s game and demeanor are missing inaction. Does seem Carlos Delfino manages to combine two not-oft-paired qualities. He plays both ends, plays hard, anticipates, gets results that usually come from a mind well engaged. At yet, at every break his expression is that of a Spanish nobleman (just a metaphor) dabbling in something that’s amusing but hardly a matter of life and death. He rather seems to float above the game, finding his own humor and irony in who-knows-what aspects of the game. He talks to his teammates quite a bit, with enthusiasm, but still seems to have a different view. Enough. Good night.

by unklchuk on Jan 31, 2010 2:22 AM CST reply actions  

Oops, Miami forgot to show up. Good to see the bucks actually put two wins together. Let’s go for 3!

by Troy J. on Jan 31, 2010 10:14 AM CST reply actions  

Playoff hopes

We’ve gotten used to saying all year that anyone can make it in the East, but if you look at the East/West standings there’s been a bit of convergence. Charlotte, Chicago and Miami are all a game above .500 in the East and occupying the final three spots while New Orleans is five games over .500 in the 8th spot out West.

The big difference is that the West has three .500 or better teams outside playoff position, but it’s looking increasingly like a sub-.500 record won’t be good enough to make it into the playoffs in the East. I’m not convinced the Bulls, Heat and Bobs can all stay at this level for the rest of the season but there’s no guarantee the Bucks can get close to 40 wins either.

by Frank Madden on Jan 31, 2010 11:51 AM CST reply actions  

Hopes...

I’m preparing for a middling season. Probably no playoff spot. Probably no high draft pick. Probably no major trades for WinNow. Probably no major trades for WinLater.

Hammond is likely to treat the team like wine. “We will make no move before it’s time.”

That likely means continued doses of patience. Combined with the possibility of later success. And also the risk of failure – failure of the later moves, failure of The Plan, failure of the GM, failure of the Owner, and/or failure of Good Luck.

In my view, the Bucks aren’t quite interesting enough to warrant watching 100% of the typical game. They’re trying, they’re better, but they’re missing a lot of tools.

I’m not leaving as a fan. But I may dial down my intensity of interest to conserve energy for the “long” haul.

If events prove all this wrong, great…

by unklchuk on Jan 31, 2010 1:49 PM CST reply actions  

I know what your saying… they are stuck in a mediocrity rut. I like that they are atleast competing and maximizing their limited talent. Once we get some bad contracts off the books, have a couple more rotation players, and the continued development of our young guys we will be a consistent playoff team. Whether or not we will be upper echelon, that depends on the moves Hammonds makes but I anticipate playoffs next year and beyond… and who knows it is a long shot but maybe this year as well.

Either way I atleast like that this team is aimed in the right direction and am enjoying the ride this year.

by Superelkman on Jan 31, 2010 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Optimal viewing

For some reason I can never get enough of watching the Bucks, but for those with a bit more of a life I’d recommend watching 100% of home games and, well, a lot less of road games…maybe the last quarter in case it’s close :)

But yeah, I agree that there’s always this distinct feeling of treading water with the Bucks. There’s enough of the “win a little bit now” pressure to prevent complete tanking (heck, the presence of Skiles alone makes tanking tough). I understand it—the team has fallen so far under the local radar that a bit of excitement seems needed to prevent the Bucks from declining into complete irrelevance.

If the season ended today the Bucks would be picking 11th in the draft and I think there’s still an opportunity to get a quality player there—maybe not another Jennings, but the upside is that this draft is heavier on PFs and wing players, which is where we need to get more talent and athleticism. At this point I like what Luc, Ersan and Delfino bring to the table but I have a hard time penciling in any of those guys as starters long term. The pressure will be on Hammond to hit another home run, or at least a double rather than strike out.

by Frank Madden on Jan 31, 2010 2:52 PM CST up reply actions  

DeRozan&Hill

How would either look on our current roster? I would love to have DeRozan but Jordan Hill wouldn’t excite me (having James Harden at ASU def. helped him).

Nevertheless, I still get excited about watching my Bucks. This is the season that the Bogut finally emerges from the shadows in the East (despite no All-Star nod. It can only be good for his body to rest, as evidenced by the “Two Days Off” Theory). This is the season Brandon Jennings was the most exciting rookie since Jesus Shuttlesworth. This is the season we got to watch an offensively awkward Luc Richard do…whatever he does on offense (unintentional comedy at its best). But most of all, this is the season that the seeds are sowed for the Bucks’ future. Danny Gadz models more suits than a Men’s Wearhouse salesman. Michael Redd and his onerous contract has now become the blessed expiring contract next year that plays trump like the ace of spades. Outside of Ridnour and Warrick (and maybe Delfino, though I would imagine he is now firmly entrenched in next year’s rotation), all the players you see mature this year will be plying their trades like masters next season (most hopefully, Luc Richard). We may not be the best team every night, but some nights, we are able to beat (or almost beat, which earns Tommy points with me) the best in the NBA. The Lakers, the Suns, the Mavs, the Magic… We may lose to the Kings and blow double digit leads to the Bulls on the road, but we have absolutely dominated their NoCal neighbors, the Warriors, and there are few matchups more welcomed in the playoffs than our neighbors to the south.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Jan 31, 2010 8:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Bulls Comment

Even though it’s very unlikely we would meet them in the playoffs. I just still haven’t gotten over that game from early in the season. Heartbreak.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Jan 31, 2010 8:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Disagree about Hill...

Hill is going to be a solid player and I would gladly take him right now.

In limited time he has a PER of 17.17 and rebound rate of 15.6% which is solid.

If you look at his adjusted defensive plus/minus rating(http://basketballvalue.com/teamplayers.php?year=2009-2010&team=NYK) he is a positive asset on the defensive end although raw offensively which will undoubtedly come with playing time.

Granted… he has only play 200 minutes this year and there isn’t much of a sample size he hasn’t done anything to show that he doesn’t have the potential to be a player.

by Superelkman on Feb 1, 2010 9:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Hill in a D'Antoni

Most players in a high-octane offense like D’Antoni’s Seven Second Or Less Offense are going to have a good PER. And considering that they have trotted out Jared Jeffries at center on occasion, I wouldn’t buy into his rebounding numbers.

But perhaps you are right about him having some decent value. Our biggest hole is having a big 4 which he undoubtedly is.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Feb 1, 2010 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Why would the pace effect the efficiency of a player?

by MadTown Hoops on Feb 1, 2010 10:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Paul Masson is inspired by the very same excellence, and like only the finest, it’s vintage dated.

by MadTown Hoops on Feb 1, 2010 1:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe not the Bulls, but the Bucks are obviously on a collision course to get some revenge against Kobe and the Lakers in the playoffs… if they make it out of the West, that is.

by Alex Boeder on Jan 31, 2010 9:02 PM CST reply actions  

Young Buck

Can you imagine Jennings getting to play the NBA Finals away in his hometown. Tweets galore. And Bogut v. Bynum… Well actually. I don’t think Andrew’s forgotten the sky block levied by Bynum in their last matchup.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Jan 31, 2010 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

We really are a team that is just two or three players away from being a contender. Bogut, Jennings, Ridnoir, We can build around these guys. Mbah a Moute could become a great bench player, so could Meeks, Bell and Alexander, although time is running out for Joe. You get a 15 ppg scorer in the line up, and get someone who could take Redd’s place, we would be looking at a Bucks/Cavs first round.

by Troy J. on Feb 3, 2010 10:11 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Kksp2_small
Settling on the Bucks' Nicknames.
Ellingtonspiller_small
Possible Bucks Trades
Dsc_0031_small
I overslept
Flag-of-canada_small
The Unofficial Andrew Bogut Trade Site
Small
Joel Przybilla Update
Kksp2_small
How Russel Crowe renewed my faith in Andew Bogut
Insider_g_mbrooks_480_small
Still crying over Marshon Brooks and its only going to get worse...
Small
Andrew Bogut a chance to play against the Kings
Small
BUCKS Courtside Seating Question- Please Help!
Ellingtonspiller_small
NBA 2011-'12 League-Wide Predictions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Brewhoop_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer