Brew Hoop: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Phils, Astros complete Roy Oswalt deal

Ukic heading back to Europe, Bucks clear more salary

Good news: Roko Ukic has requested that the Bucks void his contract and allow him to sign with a European club, creating additional financial flexibility both this year and next.  That lets the Bucks off the hook for the remainder of Ukic's $1.35 million salary this year as well as the potential $1.45 million player option Ukic could have exercised this coming summer.  Sham Sports reports that Ukic will be joining Fenerbahce in Turkey.

Ukic hadn't played in eight games and had yet to crack the rotation, earning only sporadic time behind Brandon Jennings and Luke Ridnour, who not coincidentally have each been healthy for all 31 games.  Ukic's only real contribution as a Buck came against Toronto on December 9, when he scored 17 points in 25 minutes to help clobber his former team.  But after a six minute cameo three days later against Portland, it was curtains on Ukic's career as a Buck--he hadn't played since. 

The Bucks' similarly waived Lynn Greer in the summer of 2007, clearing the way for Greer to sign a more lucrative contract and substantial playing time with Olympiakos.  Ukic was a star in Europe before signing with Toronto in the summer of 2008, having spent time with FC Barcelona (Ersan Ilyasova's former team) and Lottomatica Roma (Brandon Jennings' old club), so don't expect his bank account to be hurting in Turkey.

Star-divide

 

As for the Bucks' rotation, not much changes.  Charlie Bell officially becomes the Bucks' third string PG, but it's not an unfamiliar position.  With Ukic inactive on most nights this season, he's effectively been the Bucks' emergency PG most of the year.  His actual time there has been limited however, the most obvious exception coming against Washington a couple weeks ago, when foul trouble (and Gilbert Arenas' physicality) earned both Jennings and Ridnour early trips to the pine.  Bell of course had more experience playing PG under Terry Stotts, and even managed a triple double in a rare start against the Suns in the 05/06 season.  While having Ukic as injury insurance was a nice luxury, it wasn't really necessary to carry three PGs in addition to Bell.

I'm not sure anyone is surprised that Ukic failed to make an impact, but his departure--and Carlos Delfino's current disappearance into Scott Skiles' doghouse--reiterates the general lack of enthusiasm most had for the trade that brought the pair to Milwaukee in exchange for Amir Johnson and Sonny Weems.  No one involved is having a monster season, but as of now the Raptors are clearly getting more value for their money.  I especially wouldn't mind having a bigger, more physical PF like Johnson in the Bucks' frontcourt rotation, and I haven't even mentioned the possibility that the Bucks could have cut Weems and possibly brought back Ramon Sessions for additional backcourt depth this summer.  With Brandon Jennings around I'm not losing much sleep about Sessions' departure anymore, but assets are assets, right? 

The positive cap ramifications of Ukic's departure are twofold.  For one, the Bucks now have an open roster spot, giving them added flexibility to take on an extra body should they want to make a trade, and wiping the rest of Ukic's 09/10 salary off the books will give them over $2 million of breathing room under this year's luxury tax.  It's not hugely useful, but it gives the Bucks extra room in case they are able to make any big trades that add salary this year. 

As for next summer, the Bucks now have just over $50 million committed to nine players for 10/11, a figure that includes Redd's player option and the partially guaranteed amount owed to Delfino and Luc Mbah a Moute.  That won't be enough to afford them real cap space unless they somehow deal Redd for expiring contracts, but it should give them enough room to sign their draft picks and use their full MLE--even if the tax declines by $5-7 million (it's currently at $69.92 million).

0 recs  |  Comment 6 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

What does this mean...

for the Bucks’ current state of being? Trade more likely now?

by everyoneruns on Jan 4, 2010 7:32 PM CST reply actions  

Trading Ridnour less likely

Which I’m fine with. Given where the Bucks are—the no man’s land between crap and contention—it’s OK in my mind to just let his deal expire and see if you can re-sign him for something reasonable next summer. But then again, I don’t think you turn down a blockbuster involving Ridnour’s expiring deal just because you no longer have Ukic as insurance. That’s what the D-League is for.

by Frank Madden on Jan 4, 2010 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Other trades would be easier

Just added a bit to the article about the cap ramifications—you shave about 800k or so off the 09/10 cap number, which by my math puts the Bucks at about $2.5 million under this year’s tax (haven’t confirmed that). Plus you now have 14 guys, so an extra roster spot to play with in a trade.

All told I think that puts the Bucks in a marginally better position to swing a trade now or make a bigger signing (up to the MLE) next summer. I’m not sure if that was really the plan—seems like Ukic initiated this b/c of his lack of playing time and better opportunities abroad—but it’s certainly not a bad thing.

by Frank Madden on Jan 4, 2010 8:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Johnson and Weems

Johnson is still a foul machine and sitll makes too many mistakes, mostly out of position, on defense. His energy was good until the holiday season and has fallen often noticeably since along with his minutes, which are now around only 12 a game and figure to drop even more when Evans returns some time this month.. My sense of it is that Johnson would be in the Skiles doghouse and not get on the court very much.

Weems has been a pleasant surprise for the Raptors and has has had a number of games in which he has scored in double figures.

His upside is a lot more than Johnson’s who is basically an 10th – 12 man on any decent team.

by Buddahfan on Jan 5, 2010 9:21 AM CST reply actions  

I get that Sessions is an asset, at least more than Ukic is

But why waive Weems to bring Sessions back when, as you pointed out earlier, they have two point guards and Bell already? No one else out there with Sessions’ upside?

by TheJay on Jan 5, 2010 5:40 PM CST reply actions  

I would have kept Sessions even if there was no where to play him. Skiles loves competition and having him would have pushed every other guard on this team that much more. Also, if your a good coach you find a way to get your best players on the court. Any combination of Jennings, Ridnour, and Sessions could play on the court at the same time. Would offer more flexibility to play small ball occasionally as well with Jennings, Sessions, Bell on the court at the same time. Don’t get me wrong I am not missing Sessions all that much but I do agree you need to get as much talent on your roster as possible even if you have talent at the same position.

by Superelkman on Jan 7, 2010 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.
Start posting about the Bucks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

SBNation.com Recent Stories

 LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh of the Miami Heat speak after being introduced to fans during a welcome party at American Airlines Arena on July 9 2010 in Miami Florida.  (Photo by Doug Benc/Getty Images)

How Good Will LeBron James And The Miami Heat Be In 2011? Hint: Very Good

Lorenzen Wright 
(Getty Images) +6 updates

Lorenzen Wright's Body Found In Memphis, Police Conduct Homicide Investigation

Chris Paul LeBron James

'The Miami Model': Why Greed Is Good, And The NBA's Superteam Era Will Be Great

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Brewhoop_small Frank Madden

Brewhoop_small Alex Boeder