Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Champions League Preview with Jimmy Conrad

Celtics 105, Bucks 102: Pierce's Landmark Sinks Milwaukee in Overtime

Box Score

BOSTON -- This was the team we were all waiting to see. The shots were falling, the bench was alive, and there was a real sense that everything was coming together just in time.

But some things are not meant to be, and when Paul Pierce swished a pair of free-throws for career points 20,002 and 20,003, he closed the door on Milwaukee's last chance. One errant half-court pass later, and the only thing left to console the Bucks was a day off, a shooting percentage over .400, and a 1-4 record.

The Bucks refused to go away. Down by nine after a quarter of play, the Bucks put together a strong second quarter to pull even at halftime. Thanks to a strong defensive effort and some good individual performances off the bench, the Celtics were never able to pull away. Even up five with under a minute to go, Boston just couldn't close out Milwaukee. Finally, and perhaps predictably, the less-experienced Bucks made a few key mistakes which cost them the game.

There is little comfort in a valiant defeat, but that is what we have here, in every sense of the term. This was a resilient, passionate, fight-to-the-last man defeat; a David-just-didn't-have-it-in-him defeat.

But no glorifying adjectives or positive spin can change the Truth (pun reluctantly intendend): Milwaukee is 3 games under .500 and has to concern themself with one thing only - beating the Pacers on Friday. Brandon Jennings acknowledged this reality afterward:

Hopefully this is a test for us and see how we need to play every night. We did a lot of good things tonight. Somebody's got to lose.

Star-divide

Three Bucks

Carlos Delfino. The box score doesn't do him justice, nor does the play-by-play. Delfino's lay-in down the lane with 10 seconds remaining in regulation was shocking for everyone who witnessed it. It had everyone in my apartment on their feet and brought the TD Garden to it's knees. When the vaunted Celtic defense parted like the Red Sea and Delfino tied the game at 91, anything seemed possible.

While this was certainly Delfino's most important basket, it wasn't his only contribution. His three-pointer in overtime (prior to which he was 0-3) brought the Bucks within one before Paul Pierce sank a pair of free-throws to pass 20,000 career points and take a three-point lead. He was a playmaker the entire game, coming alive when Milwaukee needed him most. The box score will record how he struggled with his shot, but Carlos was key in keeping the game competitive.

Andrew Bogut. Bogut left everything he had on the court in Boston. He banged down low and fought for rebounds. He forced his way into the post and knocked around the Celtics' frontcourt. The lone starter with a positive +/-, Bogut played four-quarters worth of game time and fought for every second of it.

Andrew's aggression is there, and he has clearly identified the moves under the basket that give him the best chance to score. Milwaukee was at its best late last season when just about every possession ran through the Big Aussie, and happily, those days appear close at hand.

Drew Gooden/John Salmons. Like they say, it's not how you start, it's how you finish. Salmons and Gooden came out looking pretty good, but when crunch time arrived, both were sporting warm-ups on the bench. Gooden was hindered by some early foul trouble again, and while Salmons was effective in a few sets, he never got into an offensive groove to justify his staying on the court. Both took steps in the right direction, but still seem out of sync with the rest of the team.

Three Numbers

50. It took five games and 50 minutes of total game time in a Bucks uniform before Keyon Dooling, a career .349 shooter from deep, sank a three for Milwaukee. He finished 2-5 from behind the arc. Dooling played his best game of the season Wednesday, so hopefully this was a sign of things to come.

26-27. Free-throws made and attempted for Corey Maggette after tonight. Maggette missed his first as a Buck late in the fourth quarter. A make would have cut the lead to 4, presenting no real different situation than a 5-point deficit. Still, it was a fun streak to watch.

105. An obvious and painful number to take note of, but this was the first game in which Milwaukee surrendered over 100 points. And it took an extra 5 minutes to do it. If you're following along, per-game numbers are on the out as pace-adjusted stats take hold, but such a nice round benchmark has some...emotional value.

Three Good

Bench. Milwaukee's bench showed up to play tonight, with strong performances coming from Ersan Ilyasova and Keyon Dooling, while Maggette continued to earn trips to the stripe. Milwaukee's bench outscored Boston's 38-19 and those guys provided an energy and execution that almost toppled the Celtics. Jon Brockman played a limited role, but continued to display a great ability to draw offensive fouls, following in the footsteps of his fellow frontcourt-mates.

Aggression. The Bucks attacked Boston's defense with a controlled intensity, for the most part (I'm looking at you, old Drew), and plagued the Celtic's forward rotation with foul trouble. Glen Davis and Jermaine O'Neal both were eventually disqualified, forcing the Celtics to adjust and monkey with some smallball lineups late in the game. With Big Baby knocking down baseline jumpers on seemingly every possession, it was a relief to see him exit.

National Attention. A loss doesn't get people talking about a team, but Milwaukee absolutely showed up to play in their biggest game of the young season. Televised on ESPN in primetime, the Bucks showed the media and NBA fans everywhere that they're up to the challenge before them. When this team plays to potential, victory is just a lucky bounce away.

Three Bad

Key Turnovers. It was mistakes that put an end to Milwaukee's upset big, most notably some critical steals by the Celtics that led to easy points when both teams were trading buckets. Delfino, for all the good he did, committed the cardinal sin of jumping without a plan and had a pass stolen by Paul Pierce late. Rondo picked his pocket earlier, leading to an outlet pass from Pierce and a layup. In a hostile environment in front of a frenzied crowd, Milwaukee's relative inexperience came back to bite them.

Geometry. A couple bad bounces off the rim might have swung this game. A key offensive rebound late in regulation found it's way to Ray Allen for a three that kept the Bucks from extending a lead. A long bounce in overtime allowed Rajon Rondo to extend a possession and keep ahead of Milwaukee in rhythm. Granted, a couple short hops off of missed shots turned into easy tips for Bogut, but the miserably helpless feeling of seeing a ball bounce back to your opponent who just bricked the shot is a sad, sad experience.

Scoreboard, Scoreboard. For all the positives we may take from this game, the end result remains a disappointment. The Bucks are now 1-4, ahead of only lowly Detroit in the Central and could find themselves three games behind Chicago tomorrow. Milwaukee should feel good about their performance against an elite team on the road, but it's all for naught if they can't maintain this level of play and take down Indiana on Friday.

Comment 33 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I dont usually comment much

but i love reading the blogs and comments u guys are fun to read.
i just wanted to voice my views on drew gooden.
he has looked pretty terrible since the 1st game and i think its got something to do with he is trying to do more than he can.
ive never seen him play other than couple snipets here or there but he looks like he has a solid mid range jumper. since playing new orleans alls he has tried to do is post up or do stupid movs to draw the foul, i think he just needs to get back to what he does best and focus on hitting some J’s.
not sure wat all u guys think but thats my opinion

by Blazza18 on Nov 4, 2010 3:16 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe it’s because nobody else (except Delfino) can seem to score right now, or maybe it’s because I’m just not used to the Bucks having a PF who is at least average, but I feel like Gooden has been looking for his offense a bit much.

Not WAY too much, but there are some times when he needs to kick it back out to Jennings and let him reset the offense.

by ZV on Nov 4, 2010 8:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's the first time I've ever seen that written about a big man

Makes sense, given this team’s spacing, but that certainly isn’t what we paid for. Kohl paid good money for a banger. Gooden isn’t what we expected.

by MadTown Hoops on Nov 4, 2010 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with ZV

This team does things better when it moves the ball around. It’s not unusual for Bogut, for example, to return the ball to Delfino when he sees him open so he can shoot from outside. Gooden should not think he must finish every ball he’s given.

by palomba on Nov 5, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Too many stupid mistakes late...

…Bogut on the baseline goes for a jump shot, decides to pass instead, rigt into the hands of a Celtic. Delfino twobad passes, Carlos and Maggette lettng their guys roam free, Maggette not knowing what the hell to do after a timeout.

Salmans still sucking, Gooden should not even be given any minutes. More positives than negatives to be sure,but the bad ones especially late in the game stand out.

Three winnable games coming up to get back to .500, then let the season start.

by upnorthfan on Nov 4, 2010 7:32 AM CDT reply actions  

The Bucks looked competative most of the night...

and honestly it seemed to me that Boston hit a few difficult shots early that were well guarded that could have been the difference in this game…

If we make one more shot and they miss one more we win this game against a top 5 team in the NBA on the road… moral victories do not show up in the box score and i am not a big fan of them but i really think this loss will propel the bucks to greater things…

by Superelkman on Nov 4, 2010 9:02 AM CDT reply actions  

i liked how the Bucks played last night

it was a fun game to watch, btw for guaranteed picks every week you guys should definitely look into the Baron Capper on www.bettorbelieveit.com. I started using the guy 2 days ago and I am 4-0 in my last 4 picks making huge profits. He is 9-1 to start the NBA season.

by Johnny Walker555 on Nov 4, 2010 12:26 PM CDT reply actions  

getting there slowly.......but pardon me for taking the lords name in vain.......

but christ almighty can we pull our finger out and buy a decent first quarter somewhere….it helps if you dont have to chase tail all game after being in double figure arrears after the first intermission…….the ship has already sailed………and Drew Gooden how about you take your 32 million and spend it on a bloody rebound

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 4, 2010 1:07 PM CDT reply actions  

I never claimed my rants were anything other than raving :)

I suppose I should say second, third and fourth quarters then,,,,,,can we win something

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 4, 2010 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

i have just lost my rag ha

after the biggest kick the guts finish to our AFL season down under and being in a sporting depression for a solid month I thought the Bucks would at least provide some relief….not so far…but we’ll be alright

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 4, 2010 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Deep Breaths BJs!

Squad Six is to the Bucks what beer is to Milwaukee (or anywhere else for that matter)... the catalyst for you doing dumb things in public and not feeling self-conscious!

by Big Crazy Dave on Nov 5, 2010 1:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

im sucking them in hard ha

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 5, 2010 4:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

pardon the pun.....curse that name it seemed funny at the time

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 5, 2010 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Their best game, despite the loss

Lots of positive signs, including Bogut not taking any of Garnett’s pompous, showboat crap. he was mentioned above, but the one player who worries me is Drew Gooden. I am beginning to wonder if one of the reasons for his multiple teams, is that he just can’t gel with anybody. He does seem to be playing by himself at times. We’re forced to give him a chance because of his lengthy contract.

On the positive, Ersan finally had a game. Dooling wasn’t that bad. Salmons is still struggling but improving. I also admire Scott Skiles for ignoring egos and sticking with the players who are playing well. Did Gooden or Salmons even play in the second half?

by tommyr on Nov 4, 2010 3:08 PM CDT reply actions  

KG won't go Boges ever again...

…did you see the way he ran away after he realised Bogut was about to bite his head off after throwing that sneaky elbow? Run, pussy, run! Typical bully…

Squad Six is to the Bucks what beer is to Milwaukee (or anywhere else for that matter)... the catalyst for you doing dumb things in public and not feeling self-conscious!

by Big Crazy Dave on Nov 5, 2010 1:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Let's look at the bright side

At least we’re not peaking too early. But seriously give them 5 more games to gel as a team then let’s see how it is.

FTD It's not about flowers anymore.
FEAR THE DEER

by CanadaBucks on Nov 4, 2010 3:16 PM CDT reply actions  

agreed...then off with their heads ;) or something to that effect

its a long season still plenty o time to get the momentum rolling the right way

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 4, 2010 3:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

We better charge into Conseco Fieldhouse ready to start that place on fire

"I'm not Nostradamus or anybody, so I don't know. Luckily, this is the worst injury I've had in my career so far."

- Drew Gooden, on the severity of his toe injury.

by Jacob Grinyer on Nov 4, 2010 3:38 PM CDT reply actions  

I'm just highly disappointed in Jennings

I’m more disappointed with Jennings so far this season than Salmons to be honest. He hasn’t been as bad as Salmons, but he’s looking like a decent back-up PG projecting into the future so far.

by FearTheDeer on Nov 4, 2010 5:56 PM CDT reply actions  

I've liked how Jennings has looked

He’s been better then last year, that’s for sure.

"I'm not Nostradamus or anybody, so I don't know. Luckily, this is the worst injury I've had in my career so far."

- Drew Gooden, on the severity of his toe injury.

by Jacob Grinyer on Nov 4, 2010 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

Jennings

+/-: -1, -14, +15, -15, -16 I’d say that sucks. He’s been outplayed by Paul, Ridnour, Miller, Armon Johnson, and Rondo so far this year. I’d argue that he was matched, or very close to it, by DJ Augustine in his self proclaimed best game of the year. Consistently IMO Boykins has been the Bucks best PG in the minutes he’s gotten, of course he’s too small to keep on the court too long tho.

by FearTheDeer on Nov 4, 2010 10:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

+/- isn't really all that reliable

On defense he might have been over matched, but offensively he has done a good job of distributing and finishing around the rim, I believe he is the least of our problems. However, he is tentative and is still inconsistent with his jump shot, but I didn’t expect him to be an all star this year. I don’t see at all how Boykins has looked the best. Jennings has clearly been the best so far, IMO.

"I'm not Nostradamus or anybody, so I don't know. Luckily, this is the worst injury I've had in my career so far."

- Drew Gooden, on the severity of his toe injury.

by Jacob Grinyer on Nov 4, 2010 10:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll put it like this

I’d bet the Bucks have a higher winning percentage at the end of the year of games that Jennings finishes with 20 points in a game than when he finishes with 10 assists. So far he’s 1 for 1 with 20+ points and 1 for 2 with 10+ assists. Why does Nash, Paul, or Deron get so many assists, because they are such a big scoring threat that they require rotations and double teams which leaves guys open. If you look like you’re going to pass, why would I double you?

by FearTheDeer on Nov 4, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would be patient with Jennings

Though I understand your concerns, I like he’s trying to came an all around PG and not a fast scorer a la Tony Parker. It should be a good thing that Skiles, an all around PG himselg, is his coach.

by palomba on Nov 5, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't write Jennings off

Things hurting Jennings: 1)Teammates not making shots. 2) Teammates finally getting into offensive rhythm, having struggled with playmaking until now. While I can’t argue that Jennings hasn’t played like a top-10 PG so far, was that really the expectation? Almost a year later, we’re still putting too much stock in his incredible start to last season.

The fact is, Jennings has improved in just about every advanced metric except per-minute scoring, which is just a function of the increased offensive versatility in Milwaukee. His assist and rebound rate are both up, and he’s shooting a little better.

Jennings might not yet be the player we all want him to be, but he’s still really young and he’s improving. Let’s temper our expectations a bit.

Think I can make a career out of this...?

by Dan Sinclair on Nov 5, 2010 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not writing off

I am not writing off Jennings talent. He is a great talent. I feel like he is a top 10 PG if he plays his game, but he’s trying to change his game to fit the mold of a “true PG” and its leaving his offense pretty stale. Some guys are PGs cuz they are great faciliators, John Wall. Most PGs are good ball handlers and short so they play PG…thats BJ3 to me. His best skill is his scoring and he’s not looking to use it.

by FearTheDeer on Nov 5, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but Rondo gets more assists than anyone

And his shot is broken. On top of that, he can’t even shot frees. Jennings has more opportunities to find passing lanes because he isn’t guarded closely. He really needs to work on getting the ball in to his teammates’ sweet spots. He still goes for the tricky or hasty pass, which leads to a turnover or a wasted possession in a lot of cases.

by MadTown Hoops on Nov 5, 2010 4:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

having a tough start like the rest of the team...but have faith the kids will be okay.....

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Nov 5, 2010 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Another Golden Opportunity Missed
Small
FSN alternate channel for Bucks game Monday
Kksp2_small
A theory on Jennings.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer