Recap: Bucks 86, Celtics 84

MILWAUKEE - Last March, right around this time, the Celtics came to town, the fans made Ray Allen feel right at home, and the Bucks scored 86 points, enough for a win.
Those are the similarities. But this is about differences. The mighty big changes in pro basketball in this city.
Because while the name still reads the same on the front of the jersey, they are just about all different on the back. The starting lineup from the March 15, 2009 win over Boston? Try Ramon Sessions, Luc Mbah a Moute, Richard Jefferson, Charlie Villanueva, and Francisco Elson. The only remaining starter, The Principal, went from shooting guard to power forward. Yeah.
So maybe we shouldn't be so surprised that it's March and the Bucks are still good.
After all, they are still the Bucks, but with Brandon Jennings, John Salmons, Carlos Delfino, Ersan Ilyasova, Luc Mbah a Moute, and this Andrew Bogut, they aren't quite like anything we remember. And try as we might to forget, we do remember.
We remember five straight last place finishes, and the players remember how it was supposed to be six straight. Even a teenager half a world away last year was apparently briefed about the past and the expectations, or lack thereof. After the game, Brandon Jennings:
I know a lot of people doubted us in the beginning of the season, had us almost last. But we are here too, we are fighting for a spot in the playoffs too. So don't forget about us.
So now we have something we actually want to remember. And the latest is a Bucks win over the Celtics, chiefly the result of magnificent play by Bogut, and magnificent plays by Bogut. The center started the game as strongly as ever, picking up right where he left off in Boston about three months ago. But as the Bucks moved away from him, the Celtics moved into the lead. Not coincidentally, Boston won its only period in the second quarter when Bogut was scoreless.
The Bucks trailed entering the fourth quarter and didn't score during the final 2:41 of regulation, but they did enough in between to make it work. Namely, Bogut carried the team on both ends while the sickly Delfino hit his fifth three of the game, Salmons popped in five quick ones, Ilyasova was eternally right-place/right-time, Jennings scooped in a floater for the final points, and the defense, oh, the defense.
Up two in the final moments, Milwaukee took a foul with 3.9 seconds to go. A good idea, but also just enough time for Ray Allen to sink his first shot of the game, a three pointer of course. But the ball went to Pierce, and, well, the Bucks defended just like they had all game, all month, all season. Still could have gone in, we know that and that. But not this time.
This was a chippy affair, a game that looked more like late-April than early-March by the time Glen Davis barreled into Jennings on a fast break, earning technicals for each.
And if this keeps up, we will soon get to watch games that are late-April instead of ones that just look the part.
THREE BUCKS
Andrew Bogut. Looking every bit the best player on a court with at least six future Hall of Fame feet running around but certainly never through him, Bogut smashed the Celtics for 10 points, six rebounds and a couple blocks in a first quarter highlighted by a slam on Big Baby Davis Big Baby Davis.
And then the second quarter happened, and so went Bogut, so went the Bucks: Nowhere. He neither demanded the ball nor did his teammates look for him, and when they did, the entry passes were telegraphed. I thought we were past that. And for the most part, we are.
Bogut stormed back to the forefront of the night in the second half with 15 more points and a couple more blocks, at once turning the game offensively, and turning the game defensively. Something like a phenomenon at both ends of the court, this Aussie.
All sorts of memorable plays: the ferocious rebound-dunk off a corner Charlie Bell three-point miss to tie the game 59-59, the epic stuff of Paul Pierce and perfect full-court outlet to Brandon Jennings who was subsequently clobbered by Glen Davis, and just when the Celtics had no answer for Bogut, the picture-perfect feed to Ersan Ilyasova for an and-one.
And in he end, he looked every bit the best player on the court -- one of the best on any court -- with 25 points, 17 rebounds, 4 blocks, and 5-5 at the line.
Carlos Delfino. Pretty early on, Jeremy dubbed this his flu game. Well, this wasn't that, but it was a nice performance for someone feeling and looking a bit under the weather, as Skiles had revealed before the game that Delfino had been suffering from the flu.
A couple of his five threes were low-probability, but they were fortunately falling on a night the Bucks needed all of his 19 points.
Delfino threaded a pretty backdoor pass to Jennings, generally found open spaces against a sticky Boston defense, and in the end clearly outplayed Paul Pierce.
Brandon Jennings. So, at 20, Jennings might not be out of his prime after all?
The learning curve is steep for all rookie point guards. For Brandon, it has been mountainous -- only he started at just about the top in November. Since then, he's taken some hard tumbles down, but continues to climb back up. And now, against two of the conference's dominant clubs against Cleveland and now Boston, Jennings has strung together two very excellent games.
An eventful night toward the end, as he missed that potential game-sealing jumper at the end, got into it with Kevin Garnett in the tunnel after the game, and had plenty to say in the post-game locker room.
Jennings and Glen Davis were both hit with technicals after Davis pretty much tackled Brandon on his way to the hoop, where it looked a lot like he wanted to dunk.
It was a hard foul. They are known for punking people, but they weren't going to come in here and just punk me.
THREE NUMBERS
18-3. Boston outscored Milwaukee 18-3 on the fastbreak, as Rajon Rondo cooked up dreamy dishes in transition while the Bucks had to work, mostly through Bogut, to score in the halfcourt. Quite an accomplishment to get just about all of those points the hard way against such a stout defense.
8-17. Milwaukee shot 8-17 (.471) on threes against the team ranking third in three point defense entering the night. I was surprised to see the Bucks were given at least three wide-open looks from deep in the first quarter alone, but I'm just getting used to this ball movement stuff.
90 %. The Bucks are playing .900 (9-1) ball since the arrival of John Salmons. After netting a personal-Bucks-low 12 points against the Cavs, John Salmons pitched in with 16 tonight despite not making a free throw for just the second time since arriving from Chicago. Such a gift to this team.
THREE GOOD
Bogut v. Boston. After putting up 25/14 with a couple blocks in round one in Boston, the center played even better tonight with 25/17 and four blocks.
From beginning to end, he had a fairly easy time using either hand to loft hooks over the awfully quiet Kendrick Perkins.
So maybe it's not so bad that the Bucks play Celtics twice more in the regular season, and perhaps more than a couple more times in the playoffs.
BC. Even in a win on Saturday over the NBA's best team, the Bradley Center didn't burst like it did tonight. The horrifying reality of paying top dollar to watch LeBron James and seeing Jawad Williams may have muted some of the customers, but the atmosphere resembled a playoff match against Boston.
Not a sellout with 14,316 on hand tonight, but the crowd was loud and ready when the drama escalated late.
With all of the road success, don't lose sight of how Milwaukee has held home court all year, not just lately. Tenth best home mark in basketball at 21-9.
Jennings was diggin' the atmosphere:
This was the craziest I think it has ever been in here so far.
Defending the stars. The Cavaliers with LeBron are title favorites, without him they are merely okay. So that win over Cleveland on Saturday rightfully led with a disclaimer.
Not this time. The Bucks beat a Boston squad in full effect, a team fighting for playoff positioning, and eager to claw, argue, and fight its way to a win.
All the stars were out (or in, if you will), including the Kevin Garnett/Paul Pierce/Ray Allen troika. Garnett (14/10) was a tough cover, but Luc Mbah a Moute and the Bucks mostly held him in check and KG only made one bucket in the final 16 minutes of regulation.
Even better was the defense on Pierce (3-13, four turnovers) and especially hometown hero Allen (0-3 in 34 minutes).
Scott Skiles doesn't offer compliments for fun:
We were really sharp on the defensive end. It was not an easy game for us, it was back and forth, a physical game... we needed our defense to keep us in the game, and it did.
THREE BAD
Battle of the benches. Sans Jerry Stackhouse, the Bucks didn't bring much off the bench. Literally.
Skiles, after the game.
The absence of Jerry was big tonight, we could have used him tonight.
Indeed. Skiles rode the starters atypically extensive minutes -- four of them played 40+ minutes -- as only Ersan Ilyasova was effective whatsoever among the backups. Charlie Bell and Luke Ridnour were particularly ineffective, to the point I can't decide who was worse.
Meanwhile, Boston received lavish production from its reserves, and the team played best when Rasheed Wallace (+11), Marquis Daniels (+4), and Nate Robinson (+2) were on the floor.
'Sheed. Not sure how he avoided a technical, but on offense, defense, during timeouts, in between quarters, possibly via telephone before and after the game, Rasheed Wallace barked at the refs. 'Sheed's natural reaction to sinking a wide-open three? Like anything else: Rather impolitely berate the official all the way down the court, of course. In the league since 1995, and this act hasn't expired?
Rondo's free throws. Rajon Rondo entered the night shooting 60.6 % from the free throw line this year, 62.8 % for his career, and 83.3 % for his career against Milwaukee. Law of percentages, that has to go down, right. So of course, Rajon just kills the Bucks, making 8-9 at the line. Nifty player though.
1 recs |
32 comments
|
Comments
Here here
awesome recap
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Mar 10, 2010 8:13 AM CST up reply actions
Stackhouse's hammy
From Skiles in the JS:
“He got hurt in the game the other night. We don’t think it’s anything serious. He got treatment yesterday and it was still just a little bit sore this morning.
“With two days before we play again, we didn’t see any reason to aggravate it tonight.”
Ball movement and effort on defense...
Thats all I want to see from my team and this team has found a way to do that most nights… very fun to watch…
Great as usual Alex!
Wow if the Bucks keep playing like this the bandwagon is going to get pretty full.
When we couldn’t score the last 2:30 or so I was getting a bit worried, but good defensive teams find a way through rough stretches like that.
Love the swagger coming from Jennings, Young Buck don’t back down.
Brandon shouldn't overdo it
It’s fine to be passionate and confident but you don’t want to be a hothead.
I was surprised when I saw him yapping away at Garnett in the tunnel right after the game.
Brandon's Mojo
I take the opposite approach. The kid plays best when he plays with a chip on his shoulder. He came into the league wanting to prove to everyone that passed on him that they made a mistake. Within the first month, he had done that. Since then, his shot has rapidly deteriorated (though his overall play has been consistently great. No TO in BJ3, both a reference to the stat and the personality). Now that we’re in a playoff race and jockeying for position with the big dogs, he’s stepped it up. Let the kid have the badd-ass persona on the court, as long as he backs it up on the court, which he does. Off the court, I haven’t heard much outside of his off-the-wall twitter usage, that would lead me to believe he’s Allen Iverson. I do wonder, however, if he could ultimately (d)evolve into Stephon Marbury.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
i agree and disagree
I also think that Brandon’s shimmying, gestures, and jawing with the likes of KG is a good thing. He is an emotional player, which can be good and bad, but so far he hasn’t fallen prey to bad emotions.
I disagree with you in even beginning to compare Brandon to AI or Marbury. He is completely different from both of them, almost like an opposite. I’m really surprised you can’t tell this as well, perhaps you don’t watch the Bucks or the other players you mentioned that much. Brandon is a class act, a guy who was the man of his house from a young age after his father took his own life, a trail-blazer who had the balls to piss off David Stern and play in Italy instead of college, and a guy who has distanced himself from the partying of guys like AI and Marbury, by living away from the city of Milwaukee and instead in a modest apartment next to the practice facility. Nothing like those other guys.
Jennings' Psyche
I know very well the story of Jennings and how he was pseudo-black-balled by Stern. But MSG’s loss is the BC’s gain. But knowing the story doesn’t even begin to allow me to imagine the psyche of a Compton-raised, Italian league-finished, wannabe icon who would seem to be living as a fallen angel in Dogma (banished to Milwaukee for those not up on their Kevin Smith trivia, FOR SHAME!). Thus, what I mean when I worry about Jennings devolving into Stephon Marbury is that Marbury was never able to connect with any of his fans and ultimately felt dissociated with his own stardom. But also, I do hope Jennings’ game can evolve into what AI and Marbury were supposed to become but neither could, a facilitator who could take over a game when in need. AI evolved his game to a whole new stratum but he never made Eric Snow or Aaron McKie great (though he did help Keith Van Horn get rich and Kerry Kittles some notoriety). Marbury, on the other hand, really is a two-part OTL special waiting to happen. Too much, too soon? Never had a coach who he could trust or could trust him? When the best adjective to describe you is “mercurial,” you should probably do some self-introspection. But Marbury instead was the first contestant to appear alone on the now defunct MTV show, “The Blame Game.” Unfortunately, we all knew he did it.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
I like it...
When was the last time we had a guy like that… I don’t want him to be stupid but a if he does that a few well-placed times, especially at home, I think it gets the team and fans fired up…
RED STRIPE
HOOOOORAAAY Jennings
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Mar 10, 2010 8:58 AM CST up reply actions
Awesome recap, Alex
I have to agree with just about everything in your recap. Bogut was the difference and you are right on in pointing out the correlation between his going scoreless in the 2nd quarter and that quarter being the only one in which the Celts outscored the Bucks.
Bogut and Delfino get the most credit for the win tonight
The giant center from Down Under did to Perkins what Dwight Howard, the best center in the league, can’t seem to do: neutralize him. Perkins scored 6 points only, was just 3/9 FG, and worst of all, got only 6 rebounds. He not only couldn’t score but was also ineffective on defense.
Bogut, on the other hand, was a monster. His 4 blocks shots and 17 rebounds say it all. He dominated on defense. No wonder the Celtics scored just 84 points.
Best Player in a Supporting Role award goes to Delfino. His 5 treys were crucial. If he had a bad shooting night, the Bucks would have lost.
The Celtics went home losers because Ray Allen, Paul Pierce, and Perkins were a combined 6/25 FG, a nifty 24%.
Signature Win
So can we christen this our Signature Win of the Season?
Drama. Grit. One young star triumphing over three of the former guard. Playoff Preview?
And when Jesus Shuttlesworth handled the ball at the top of the key, there’s no real Bucks fan who didn’t slightly gasp at the implicit irony. Instead, the Gentleman Buck deferred to his own team’s star, who promptly clanged one off the iron. If the Kelly Green-clad Celts were going to upset Squad-6, it wasn’t going to be at his honorable hand.
Chicks Dig The Long Ball.
It’s a start, but let’s see what we can do against the Jazz. Deron Williams has always killed us, with career averages of 19 points and 9 assists against the Bucks. Sloan v Skiles is going to be epic.
by MadTown Hoops on Mar 10, 2010 8:12 AM CST up reply actions
agreed...
my two favorite coaches… Skiles and Sloan really get their teams to play with grit and togetherness
Somehow I feel...
that if Ray would have taken his shot, we’d be much more sad right now. Thank god he tossed it to Paul Pierce
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Mar 10, 2010 8:36 AM CST up reply actions
top recap alex
you and frank are a must daily read.
thanks again from your australian friens and fans :)
Ridnour was worse than Bell
Seriously, Radnour was out of control tonight. He was just barreling around with the ball and fouling everyone in sight. It is really odd that he keeps committing such mindless fouls, considering he is a 7 or 8 year vet, and a PG for that matter. Come on Luke, get your head on straight so Skiles doesn’t have to be afraid to play you,
Bell hasn't played in ages so he has an excuse to be rusty....
Ridnour doesn’t….
I agree though… I specifically remember Ridnour barreling down the lane, out of control, and not attempting to put up a shot but too out of control to dish it off…
Playoff Race...
1. x-Cleveland —
2. * Orlando 5.0
3. * Boston 8.5
4. Atlanta 9.0
5. Milwaukee 15.0
6. Toronto 16.5
7. Charlotte 17.5
8. Miami 17.5
9. Chicago 18.0
Toronto, Miami, and Chicago all lost last night… we have a little breathing room at the time being… I think we need to play Boston or Atlanta in the first round because we can’t beat Orlando or Cleveland in a 7 game series…
I love the site of Chicago in 9th
We are playoff and late-lottery bound. I love it.
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Mar 10, 2010 8:46 AM CST up reply actions
That was a crafty move by Hammonds...
to get that 1st round pick trade with Chicago. He probably took notice to how overextended and burned out the Bulls roster was with injuries and that tight 7 man rotation they are running with.
by Brick's house on Mar 10, 2010 9:04 AM CST up reply actions
How amazing would it be if the Bulls were the ones on the outside looking in…that’d be just too perfect. Though I’d be holding my breath that the Bulls didn’t somehow get into the top three on lottery night (our right to trade is top-ten protected).
by Frank Madden on Mar 10, 2010 10:54 AM CST up reply actions
Ridnour & Jennings
“Seriously, Radnour was out of control tonight. He was just barreling around with the ball and fouling everyone in sight. It is really odd that he keeps committing such mindless fouls, considering he is a 7 or 8 year vet, and a PG for that matter. Come on Luke, get your head on straight so Skiles doesn’t have to be afraid to play you,”
Watching a tape of the game, I was more caught up in winning that in analyzing, but I did wonder if the play of our two PGs reflected their reaction to the opponent being a top echelon team that plays defense.
Jennings was solid, but seemed a little conservative in running the team (not so in emoting). He didn’t seem to try to break down the Celtics often, and that was probably prudent. The downside to that may have been that there were stretches when our other players were creating their own shots (more than ball movement) and those shots often weren’t high percentage.
Ridnour seemed to attempt & fail to super-energize his game to play at the Boston level. Strikes me that’s a bad strategy ‘cuz he’s not much of an athlete (by NBA standards). Trying to do too much gets him in multiple troubles, as alluded to above.
When he’s in the flow and manipulating the flow, he can be very good. Maybe he can do that only against lesser opponents who give him openings. We won’t see many of those in the playoffs.

by 















