Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Recap: Bucks 98, Pacers 94

100_1864pace_medium

Box Score

MILWAUKEE -- Four wins against the Pacers this season.

None of them particularly enchanting or inspiring, and this one certainly held to that form. A bit cruel to not have this one televised locally with the team on such a scorching run of basketball, but the Bucks and Pacers don't play the prettiest brand of basketball when they get together.

Even when it seemed like the Bucks could finally cruise to a win, they couldn't. Up by double-digits for almost the entire second half, Milwaukee turned on cruise control, and that was the problem, as they sputtered and stalled. The Pacers aren't much to begin with, and they weren't even on their game today, but they still came back and almost stole this one.

Neither team shot well, Indiana's offense was as bad as advertised through three quarters, and the Bucks turned a 16-point lead into a 92-88 ballgame with three minutes to go. The details are grim, and they include Solomon Jones, Brandon Rush, and Danny Granger giving it to Milwaukee's backups, starters, anyone.

Milwaukee made a few plays at the end, but they mostly had the clock run out in time. A.J. Price (as though the wins and losses don't matter at this point) got a technical and gave Milwaukee a point right when everything was going for his team down 91-86, and the Bucks ironically finished it off at the free throw line, where the Pacers spent just about the entire day.

Jerry Stackhouse (the fifth different leading scorer in a row) stepped up because someone always does during this run that has outgrown "nice" and "little." Some of the wins have been tremendous, some are just wins.

This was just a win, but it was. And it's not easy beating the same team four times. The Bucks are going to find that out all over again in about a month against an opponent much stronger than the Pacers.

Star-divide

THREE BUCKS

Jerry Stackhouse. After a quiet, five-point night against Utah, Stack came back and masked his team's bad offensive start with a trio of three pointers in the first half that gave the Bucks an eight-point lead at halftime.

His outside shooting was really a story of the game -- without him making 4-6 from deep the Bucks would have an epically disappointing loss on their hands. But Jerry was on from outside, and he went inside went necessary: Early in the fourth quarter, he contorted through the lane and hung in the air for a gorgeous layup in traffic.

Team-high 20 points, the five turnovers are too many, but a very strong game overall.

Andrew Bogut. Following three smashing games against the Pacers, Bogut struggled from the onset in this one, making 1-6 from the field in the first quarter and just 2-10 going into the half.

And in the end, he finished with 15/12/3, three more blocks, and zero turnovers. The three blocks are pretty standard, you notice them like you notice seven rebounds from Ersan Ilyasova -- because that is an average day at work now.

In the (rather recent) past, when Bogut was off, he was off. Now when the Aussie is off, he is still one of the better players in the game. That's a telltale sign of a pretty good player becoming a very good one.

At least 12 points in 17 of the past 18 games for Bogut. Not surprisingly, 15 wins in those 18 games.

Luke Ridnour. For the first time this season, for the first time in his almost three seasons with the Bucks, Ridnour went scoreless in consecutive games, against the Celtics and Jazz. One of the real stars of the team of the first few months was devolving into barely a rotation player -- so it's good to have you back, Luke.

Nothing overwhelming, but 13 points on 5/8 shooting and connecting on his only three point attempt is reminiscent of his early-season success.

Skiles, post-game:

I thought he was very sharp tonight.

THREE NUMBERS

1. Indiana pulled down just one offensive rebound in the first half despite missing 24 shots in the first 24 minutes. They finished the game with six offensive boards, compared to 14 for Milwaukee.

50 %. The Bucks made 8-16 threes, and they needed them.

40-20. Milwaukee doubled up Indiana inside, scoring 40 points in the paint compared to 20 for the Pacers.

THREE GOOD

We've got backup. The Bucks have won recently more in spite of the bench, but the reserves returned to form this afternoon. Aside from Ilyasova, no one outside the starting five did much of anything in wins over Cleveland, Boston, and Utah. And while Ersan was back at it again, much of the second line gave the Bucks a much-needed jolt on Sunday afternoon.

The reserves scored the first 18 points of the second quarter, extending the lead from a slim four to a fat 11 point cushion that they held onto ever-so-narrowly throughout the rest of the game. Stackhouse was the most money, dropping 11 points in the first half and nine more in the secnod, and it was wonderful to see Luke Ridnour and Kurt Thomas contribute, just like old times.

Milwaukee's backups scored 46 points compared to 17 for Indiana's reserves.

D = T. Since coming home from the nation's capitol after annihilating the Wizards on March 5, the Bucks swept a four-game homestand.

And in each of those games, the visiting team has racked up at least one technical. Against Cleveland, it was Anderson Varejao, then Glen Davis for Boston, a couple in a row kicked out Utah's Carlos Boozer, and coach Jim O'Brien and then A.J. Price (particularly bad timing late in the fourth) both earned technicals for dissent today.

And the reason isn't that the Bucks are getting all of the calls. Rather, this has everything to do with how the Bucks are frustrating opponents, mostly on the defensive end.

The BC is not a fun place for opponents to play. Not when the home team hasn't lost there in what will be over a month, as they hit the road this week. Last BC loss? March 17 against Houston. And if that feels like a long time ago, that makes sense.

Just win. After all the physical and emotioinal energy expended in the last three wins, it probably wasn't easy getting up for the Pacers. Or getting up at noon. After daylight saving cut an hour off. And, indeed, it didn't look like they got up for the game, but they got the win.

Brandon Jennings, after the game:

I haven't played this early in the morning since an AAU basketball game, and that was about three years ago. That's when I was about 16 or 17 so I had a lot of energy. Now, I was a little sluggish getting up this morning.

THREE BAD

The fourth. Milwaukee was well on its way to holding a sixth straight opponent under 90 points when they started the final quarter with a 76-62 lead. But just as both teams appared reading to admit the game was over, it all unraveled.

Soloman Jones and Brandon Rush led the comeback, and that is not a promising start to a sentence. Now, it got to the point where Skiles had to re-insert Bogut and Jennings into the game with over four minutes left when it looked like they would be able to rest the rest of the way.

But don't blame this one on the bench -- the Bucks had a nice lead in the first place largely thanks to its reserves. And after Bogut and Jennings returned, the Pacers still outscored them by two, so it's not like they closed it out that gracefully.

32 in the fourth for Indy. Just an uneasy way to finish such a tremendous run of basketball at home before the Bucks take to the road this week.

Solomon Jones. Big bad Solomon Jones was good, which was bad for the Bucks. Sort of like letting Earl Boykins beat you over and over, except seventeen times larger, Milwaukee allowed the seldom-used Jones to make the most of seven fourth quarter minutes.

Jones came into the game with 7:13 to go in regulation and the Pacers down by 14 points. And from that point on, he was the best player on the floor, I know most of you didn't get to watch the game, but he really was it. Jones was equally punishing on both ends of the court and he scored nine points, had a huge steal, and pulled down three offensive rebounds in a shockingly effective run. Good thing Roy Hibbert was out there for 29 minutes.

Free throw game. I hyped Milwaukee's free throw form in the preview, and TheJay posted an updated look at the Bucks losing the free throw battle this season just a couple minutes before tip-off. And free throws certainly proved to be a theme of the day, but not in a good way.

The Pacers shot 33-36 from the free throw line, while the Bucks made 18-24. Indiana is a terrible offensive team, and just about the only way they were able to hang was at the line. Danny Granger is an awfully tough cover, and he earned 11-11 at the stripe, but 36 attempts overall is just inexcusable. The Bucks have been good defensively from the start, but they have only been moving up as their foul-happy play has been toned down. Too many easy points.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Sweet

And the Clips lost, which means even if Chicago goes into tank mode, they probably can’t out-tank those behind them.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Mar 14, 2010 5:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Best comment I have read

as quoted
 “In the (rather recent) past, when Bogut was off, he was off. Now when the Aussie is off, he is still one of the better players in the game. That’s a telltale sign of a pretty good player becoming a very good one.”

I have been reading these post for some time now and I think this is one of the best things written on here. Especially for the Bucks and their fans.

by McTuck on Mar 14, 2010 5:58 PM CDT reply actions  

You're right

Previously when Bogut was cold offensively he’d tend to frequently disappear in every other aspect as well, which is pretty inexcusable for a big guy who can rebound, passes well, and blocks shots. Heck, that’s why the name “Emo Bogut” was ever invented (and I’m ignoring an even more descriptive noun that rhymes with “cube”). Now when he has a bad night it seems like he still gets a lot of touches, but more importantly he still rebounds, plays defense, etc. The way it should be.

by Frank Madden on Mar 14, 2010 6:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, I’m not sure I’ve ever been more happy to be done with a team that the Bucks swept 4-0. As Alex noted, the Bucks always seem to play down to the Pacers, but not quite down far enough to lose. Good riddance.

by Frank Madden on Mar 14, 2010 6:08 PM CDT reply actions  

:)

I think this pretty much mirrors the Bucks on a whole. Kinda moved to the stage were we can start picking out the disappointing aspects of a victory, its a nice feeling

yeah even early in the season Bogut would every once in awhile turn out a real stinker, can recall a couple of games Skiles getting fed up and benching him pretty early on

think the next step for Bogut is matching up against D.Howard and seeing how he goes, maybe Im wrong but one of those ‘bogut specials’ was against Orlando 5 pts or soemthing like that

we’ll know we really made it when so many people think that we are under rated that in fact we become over rated, ah heady times indeed

by ILIKEBJ'S on Mar 14, 2010 6:09 PM CDT reply actions  

hi 5's for Bougut

also kudos to Bogut for having the good taste to actually improve after signing a big contract a couple of years ago, normally its the other way round, though admittedly after last season it did look like it could go either way

by ILIKEBJ'S on Mar 14, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

After his comments...

He either had to put up or shut up. Even when he’s not putting up, he’s still a force. The paint was off limits this after(or before really) noon.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Mar 14, 2010 6:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

ROI

now if only they could spell ROI in dutch

by ILIKEBJ'S on Mar 14, 2010 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Loyalty is a funny thing in the NBA...

…and in the US sporting ethos as a whole. While he did sign a pretty decent contract, Bogues has been brought up in the Aussie mold of sporting teams. We don’t have the huge amounts of money that are available to elite athletes in the US. As a result, loyalty to team and teammates is much more prevalent, which is why I always found it confusing/interesting hearing reports of NBA players only playing to their potential in ‘contract’ years.

Drew is in Brew Town to play ball for his team, not a contract. It’s in his (green and gold) blood (ok maybe a bit of Croatian red, white and blue too). Rest assured he will play his guts out for the Bucks until he retires or the front office sends him on his way.

by Big Crazy Dave on Mar 15, 2010 3:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

very true

totally agree with regards to Bogut, and that whole sporting upbringing in Australia, where expecially in AFL its very rare for a top talent to trade clubs. Even when relatively speaking very good money is available. Being a one club player is kinda a feather in your cap.

Also when one of the criticisms of him previously was that he was too unselfish, which is always kinda of a nice critique to get.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Mar 15, 2010 4:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Everyone's getting excited about us catching Boston...

but correct me if I’m wrong, that’s not possible. Boston would still be a division winner, so we would need to catch the Hawks. A division winner is guaranteed a home playoff series, right?

Oh well, Chicago has lost 7 straight. We have 5 games on them now. Let’s go Bucks!

by dishingoutdimes on Mar 14, 2010 8:23 PM CDT reply actions  

You are right

For a moment I thought we could catch either team and get the 4 seed, but it is only the Hawks. All this unfamiliar winning this late in the season has got me delusional, but I’ll take it. Home court against the Hawks would be nice, but facing Boston in a 4-5 matchup almost seems better with Boston’s age and Bogut’s dominance of them. Im just glad Toronto’s west coast trip is done (all losses) cuz we need them to hold off Chicago for that last playoff spot. It would obviously be better to swap draft picks at 11 instead of 16 or 17 with the Bulls.

by 808bucks on Mar 15, 2010 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seedings

The three division winners and best non-division winner with the best record get the top four seeds.

Should the Bucks finish with a better record than the division winning Celtics, we would still be the fifth seed behind Boston due to our lesser record than the Hawks (top non-divison winner), BUT the Bucks would have home-court advantage since they have a better record than Boston.

I believe that is how it works.

by MJ Poe on Mar 15, 2010 2:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hmmm....

So it would matter if we caught the Celtics. The bracket format stays the same just that we would get home court. I like that idea. Keep it up Bucks, we can not sleep on the Clippers or Kings, they are pretty good home teams and we always have trouble out west regardless. We can beat good teams at home, but on the road its a different story. A win in Denver would be bigger than any of these past home wins IMO. bucksfosho

by 808bucks on Mar 15, 2010 3:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'll be at the Game in Denver

Cheering my ass off. I"ll be the 1 man squad 6.

Go Beer, I mean Bucks

by Take Back Our Bucks on Mar 15, 2010 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

If we win out I'll be happy either way

35-29 today, 53-29 come mid-April…sure, why not?

[cues 30-point loss against Clippers]

by Frank Madden on Mar 15, 2010 11:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Take Back Our Bucks

I was suppossed to go to Denver also, but my friend who lives there had to leave town for the weekend so I am only going to LA and Sac. Wish I had known you would be there, I still would have gone if I knew another Bucks fan would be there….haha. Do you live in Denver?

by 808bucks on Mar 15, 2010 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

the division winners and the top record after that get the top 4 seeds in order of best record....

however…. if boston got the 4 because they won their division but we had a better record than them as a 5… we would have the lower seed but home court advantage….

this is my understanding of it… let me know if i am wrong…

by Superelkman on Mar 15, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seedings & Luke

On RealGM they said the same: if we finish with a better record than Boston, we’re still 5th seed, but get a home court advantage. Take some doing to catch the Celtics, but this whole string has taken some doing.
  
  
I sometimes think Luke’s game falls apart playing against good athletes challenging him at both ends of the court. That he can’t use his head to be effective if his body is over-matched. He seems to have played well Sunday. What kind of defense did the Pacers put against him? Did they challenge him on offense?

by unklchuk on Mar 15, 2010 6:00 AM CDT reply actions  

This team is legit

it may, in fact, be TOO legit.

which, further, indicates they may not QUIT.

by SoCalBucksFan on Mar 15, 2010 1:05 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Stop,

It has been determined that it is in fact a chronological opportunity for construction tools.

"Brandon Jennings needs a nickname before he gives himself one. Oh wait, Young Money, he already did."

by Mitchell Maurer on Mar 15, 2010 1:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

the big 50

I waiting to see how long before someone dared mention 50 wins………..

by ILIKEBJ'S on Mar 15, 2010 1:43 PM CDT reply actions  

Need to go 14-3 in last 17 games

Here’s the remaining sched, with some not-outrageous but completely unscientific W/L assumptions (which would take us to 12-5 for 48-34 final record):

@LAC (W)
@SAC (W)
@DEN (L)
ATL (W)
PHI (W)
MIA (W)
MEM (W)
LAC (W)
CLE (L)
@CHA (L)
PHO (W)
@CHI (L)
NJ (W)
@PHI (W)
BOS (W)
ATL (W)
@BOS (L)

I tried to split the toss up games, but you could certainly argue it will go differently against the Hawks, Celtics and some of the tougher road games. You have to figure there will be at least one surprise loss and hopefully one surprise win. And the last three could be much easier if the Hawks and C’s lock up their playoff seeding by the final week. Either way, it’s pretty crazy to think the Bucks are staring at mid-40s wins if they just keep things up.

by Frank Madden on Mar 15, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

you just had to slap us with a jinx....

as Skiles would say … we haven’t done anything yet and need to take this one game at a time…

by Superelkman on Mar 15, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

i thiiiiinnnnk he is still waiting for that signature roadwin before he unbottles the enthusiasm genie…….do the Clipps count?

by ILIKEBJ'S on Mar 15, 2010 2:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Kksp2_small
Settling on the Bucks' Nicknames.
Ellingtonspiller_small
Possible Bucks Trades
Dsc_0031_small
I overslept
Flag-of-canada_small
The Unofficial Andrew Bogut Trade Site
Small
Joel Przybilla Update
Kksp2_small
How Russel Crowe renewed my faith in Andew Bogut
Insider_g_mbrooks_480_small
Still crying over Marshon Brooks and its only going to get worse...
Small
Andrew Bogut a chance to play against the Kings
Small
BUCKS Courtside Seating Question- Please Help!
Ellingtonspiller_small
NBA 2011-'12 League-Wide Predictions

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Brewhoop_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer