Bucks 106, Celtics 95: Bucks drop Celtic scrubs, get ready for Atlanta this weekend
The game itself? Not the most serious of affairs. With four out of five starters resting, the Celtics made it clear at tip-off that they weren't too concerned with generating any momentum for the playoffs, though considering the age of the Big Three that's fairly understandable. Instead, Doc Rivers rolled out a Rondo-and-a-bunch-of-random-dudes lineup that most certainly will never see the court when things get restarted this weekend. So much for fan appreciation night. Anyway, Rondo was terrific--seems to be a recurring theme against the Bucks--but the random dudes? They lived up to their randomness.
The Bucks on the other hand did have something to play for, knowing that a win coupled with a Miami loss (sans Wade, O'Neal and Haslem) against the Nets would bump them back into the fifth spot in the East. And while the box score suggests the Bucks were going easy on their starters, that had more to do with the bench outplaying them than Scott Skiles wanting to give the regulars a break. Ridnour couldn't miss, Stack was feeling vintage again, Ilyasova was rainbowing jumpers. Heck, even Dan Gadzuric was stuffing the stat sheet in the second half against a pretty tragic frontline that prominently featured Shelden Williams and Brian Scalabrine.
But while the Bucks did their part, the Nets perhaps predictably found a way to lose against the Heat's D-League crew, denying Milwaukee a chance to renew acquaintances with the real Celtics in the first round. That locks the Bucks into the sixth seed, about eight spots higher than most experts predicted in October.
Next stop: Atlanta.
Three Bucks
Luke Ridnour: 27 min, 17 pts, 6/6 fg, 3/3 threes, 2/2 ft, 8 ast, 2 reb, 1 to
Ridnour finished 2010 showing off exactly why 2010 was such a memorable season for him. After Jennings promisingly ripped a couple jumpers to start the game, the rookie had a couple defensive lapses and yielded to Ridnour, who along with Ilyasova and Stackhouse got the Bucks back on track. Pretty standard stuff: give him a hint of daylight and a chance to set his feet, and Ridnour will make you pay. He didn't fare any better trying to stop Rondo, but on a night like this it didn't really matter.
Jerry Stackhouse: 28 min, 17 pts, 7/11 fg, 3/5 threes, 0/2 ft, 5 reb, 4 ast
Stack looked pretty out of gas a couple weeks back, but apparently even old dudes can get their second wind. He's almost no threat to score off the drive, but for whatever reason he's still effective operating out of the post--maybe defenders will realize at some point he's just going to shoot over them every time? Stack's now cracked double-digits in four of five and is basically the only other guy aside from Salmons who seems to gets isos, which is kind of hilarious in an "our offense is so screwed" kind of way.
Dan Gadzuric: 26 min, 14 pts, 7/12 fg, 0/1, 9 reb, 2 stl
There was a time when Gadz was liable to drop a 14/9 line every couple weeks. Now is not that time. But let's focus on the positive: Gadz surpassed his previous season highs of eight points and eight rebounds by doing what Gadz does: running around, jumping up and down, and throwing the ball in the direction of the rim enough to rack up 14 points. There may have been an airballed, step-back 20-footer from the left corner mixed in there somewhere.
Three Numbers
69-36. A monster night from the bench, which shot 56% (28/50) en route to a +33 edge on the Celtics subs. Of course, it should be noted that most of the Celtics bench was moonlighting as the Celtics starting lineup, and the C's even signed a guy named Oliver Lafayette off the street (OK, the D-League) this afternoon, seemingly with the sole intention of losing this game.
In fact, it turns out the Yahoo box score was missing Lafayette entirely--they didn't have time to add him to their NBA database apparently--hence the C's point total only add up to 88.
.506. The Bucks' offense these days is, uh, interesting. Aside from the occasional John Salmons drive, they basically just chuck jumpers with little pretense of scoring around the cup. That's translated into plenty of bricks since Bogut went down, but the pseudo-Celtics they faced tonight allowed plenty of open shots and the Bucks moved the ball well (25 ast), didn't make many mistakes (7 to) and, yes, made shots (51%).
28. The Bucks set out to win the game but still managed to keep everyone under 28 minutes on the night. Hooray, depth! The Bucks also scored 28 points in the paint, tying their post-Bogut high. And yes, that's still terrible.
Three Good
Bench. The Bucks' second unit had the benefit of facing the worst the Celtics had to offer, and they did what they're supposed to do. It's also what we've seen from them for much of the season--nothing spectacular, but they play consistently, make more shots than you'd expect from a group that considers Stackhouse their go-to guy, and defend with enough intensity that it's tough to go on big runs against them.
Playing Big(ger). The Hawks crushed the Bucks on the glass (48-34) and in the block column (11-1) on Monday, so it could be a long series from a physicality standpoint. Hmm. At least tonight the Bucks kept it respectable, outrebounding the C's 41-34--the first time they've won that column since the Nets win five games ago.
Finishing. Whatever happens in the next couple weeks, you have to admit this is a pretty loveable team. Surpassing all expectations, they broke the usual Buck pattern of good starts and miserable finishes to rack up the most wins Milwaukee has seen since the crew that went to the Eastern Conference Finals. 46 wins! Pretty crazy.
Two Bad
PG post problems. Jennings' complete lack of strength makes him an easy target in the post, yet we haven't seen many teams try to take advantage of it--off the top of my head, Billups and Stuckey were two of the only guys who seemed to actively try to bully the little guy down low. Rondo made it look easy on a couple occasions, as Jennings looked completely out of sorts unless he got a hard double to help. Here's a hint, Brandon: if your guy catches the ball five feet from the hoop with his back to you, consider putting a forearm or maybe a hand into his backside. At least let him know you're there. I don't expect Bibby to get many post touches in the playoffs, but the Hawks do have the ability to go big with Crawford at the point.
Bulls in. It's not like we needed much motivation to root against the Bulls, but the whole pick-swapping thing made it even more of an issue. Alas, the Chris Bosh injury and subsequent Raps collapse came just in time: the Bulls won tonight against an unmotivated Bobs squad in Charlotte, locking up the 8th seed. That means the Bucks will have to settle for the 15th pick in the first round.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
so close Dan so close.........
would have prefered the C’s just look old and cranky and exploitable for one or two games……..having said that well when it gets down to the wire Atlanta basically look to let Joe Johnson take over for better or worse, with Crawford’s over confidence always meaning he is likely to try and jack up the game winner in the 4th
anyway whatever happens 46 wins…….is a great effort everyone deserves some credit hopefully they can put up a good effort in the playoffs and round out a pretty damn fine year
46 wins
8 more than I predicted last fall. Remarkable.
In the 1st playoff game, I’ll be looking for some kind of spark. Something that hasn’t been there in the last few losses. If I don’t see it, I’ll just go back to…
46 wins
I'm glad we got this last game even if it was meaningless...
The Bucks need to bring their A-Game on defense to the playoffs, move the ball on offense, and hope to get hot from outside… looking forward to the playoffs starting… hopefully we make this series competative…
How much of a shocker would it be if we stole game 1?
Any one on here going to one of the playoff games?
#15 pick...
Now that we are locked into the 15th pick… what do you guys think we should do with it?
Hassan Whiteside or Xavier Henry would be my top two selections at that spot for guys who should still be around….
Hassan Whiteside scares me.
He is one of those bust or boon questionable characters that I would just assume avoid at this point. He also lacks bulk, which is something I would like to see in any frontcourt player that the Bucks add in the off season.
by Brick's house on Apr 15, 2010 12:28 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd really like Udoh,
He’s a stud. Filthy blocker.
I also like James Anderson from Oklahoma State. The knock on him is that he doesn’t defend, but if you have the killer instinct on offense to play above the rim and score from all over the court, you have the ability to defend. I think he just wasn’t asked to. Skiles would make him defend.
In the second round, I like Earl Clark from Iowa St. He could have been a lottery guy last year, but decided to stay in College and regressed with the entire burden of the team on his shoulders. He is a scorer and super athletic. On the other end of the spectrum, and laugh if you want to… Luke Harangody from ND. Hard working white guy makes good, it’s the story that Scott Skiles was born to write
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Apr 15, 2010 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions
Sorry I meant Craig Brackins, from Iowa State,
I don’t know where my head is at some times.
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Apr 15, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions
I have seen Brackins in person several times
You don’t want him on the Bucks, he is a poor man’s Charlie V., right down to the low motor, no defense and wimpy rebounding. He had more help this year than last with Gilstrap, who is also a fringe draft player.
by Brick's house on Apr 15, 2010 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions
# 15
if your drafting for need then its either the power forward and shooting guard spot that needs attention most right? But then again you could say we need depth all around so at pick #15 you just take the best available talent
Id prefer we aim at shoring that power forward spot/ back up centre, Bogut really needs some support and an athletic guy that can rebound, block shots, score a bit would mean we could have the luxury of bringing Prince off the bench rather than having to start him…….
having said that if they want some insurance regarding Salmons well then look at shoring up the shooting guard spot, this team can always really use a guy who can score
dont see much of any of college basketball and definitely havent seen any of Whiteside or Henry but reading their draft xpress profiles, there are some nice complimentary skills which is what you’d expect at pick #15 unless you luck out your not getting a superstar
either way in our situation as long as we get someone that can earn playing time and contribute is important, this team just needs to add some talent and depth and the draft is always the cheapest way to do that if you nail a pick……….plus we have a decent record of finding 2nd round help so that is always a plus but still need to nail that 1st round pick
yeah with Phillys 2nd round pick(6th pick in the 2nd?) we should have a good shot of getting another contributer in the draft...
If we can add two rotation guys I would be ecstatic…
by Superelkman on Apr 15, 2010 12:21 PM CDT up reply actions
yeah 6th or 7th in the 2nd sounds about right......
yeah pick #15 its kinda neither here nor there, but you would hope you would get a pretty decent rotation guy, whether he can help out immediately well with Bucks that depends pretty much on how much they want to fit into Skiles ethos and work hard defensively……
two picks in the 2nd guess one will go on a international guy who we can stash overseas the other one well hopefully you get a guy who can contribute like Prince but they are going to have their limitations I guess
also.....
after the Joe Alexander train wreck Id always rather draft someone who has some tangible basketball skills & IQ rather than drafting a project guy based on athleticism or wingspan or whatever they measure…it just makes me nervous now
Settle for the 15th pick? That’s perfect. The Bulls have amazing lottery luck, something which has nothing to do with their major market status. With the Bucks fortune, we should be grateful to have a switch locked up.
As for the playoffs, I am ecstatic. The Bucks seemed outmatched when I saw them on Monday, but that mostly was the Josh Smith factor. Joe Johnson is a force, but he can be guided to an inefficient game. I can see the Bucks taking this one. Skiles can make anything happen.
Just got tickets, so I’ll see this one from the lower bowl on Saturday, April 24th. Go Bucks!
where we seem over matched is that Horford/Smith combination……….just stopped us defensively in terms of any penetration and ability to get to into the paint, which isnt a strength of ours even with Bogut, Horford is a real killer in that the guy can switch and defend the quicker guards and even if he does get beaten Smith is there to offer cover with his shot blockin, he had about 6 last game I think
Salmons output has matched Joe Johnson pretty well in the three match up so far, really interesting in how Jennings goes, is he going to be aggressive in getting into the lane, is he going to settle for his step back 3 point shot? And if his shot isnt falling what will he do?
In fact it will be fun just seeing who steps up, and what they bring, heck its just great to be in the play offs
Going to be fun.
We're such typical Bucks fans
As soon as game 82 is in the books, we start talking about the draft :) Our needs are fairly obvious (scoring wing to replace/add to Salmons next year or in the future, 4/5 to give us better size/depth up front), and there are at least some possibilities in there.
Very glad we could finish with a win—seemed only fair given everything this team has accomplished this year…and 4-2 finish without Bogut is nothing to shake a stick at.

by 
















