Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Clippers Need To Realize That Spurs Are The Anti-Grizzlies

Bucks 111, Hawks 104: White-Hot Bucks Tie Series

Whytewhyo_medium

Box Score

MILWAUKEE -- Oh, Deer. We have a series.

Two days later, the Bradley Center turned white instead of red, but it was still 688 miles away from Philips Arena, and the Bucks were still red-hot when they weren't white-hot.

Milwaukee maintained their exquisite shooting form from over the weekend, but this time they found it easier closer to the hoop. Having gone a long way to figure out how to exploit the fast, constantly-switching, often-stuffing Atlanta defense, the Bucks made wildly successful forays into the painted area, led by Brandon Jennings.

Yes, the rookie kid point guard who too often personified the team's struggles to score inside throughout the last six months went on the attack, driving his way to a team-high 23 points. Jennings made five shots at the rim, and no three-pointers. Jennings, Dan Gadzuric, you know, the usual suspects doing harm around the hoop. Meanwhile, Carlos Delfino co-starred with Jennings by pouring in threes (6-8) to help offset a hot outside shooting night by Atlanta (10-19 on threes).

Unlike Game 3, this one wasn't all rosey from tip. The Hawks rushed to a 12-6 start as Mike Bibby made a couple quick threes (familiar, much?), as the Bucks looked a tad nervous with the ball early. But by the end of the first quarter, Delfino had snapped out of a funk and into hero mode, Gadzuric had three points, and the Bucks had a lead -- and they wouldn't trail again. So while this was the first game within single digits, Milwaukee mostly owned it.

It's not like the Hawks didn't wake up for this one. Joe Johnson (29/9/4), Mike Bibby (5-7 on threes), Josh Smith (20/9), and Jamal Crawford (21 points off the bench) certainly came to play, and the road team shot well, particularly from outside (10-19 on threes). Which makes this win even more encouraging -- Atlanta didn't just show up in Milwaukee expecting to win (or concede a game), and Milwaukee wasn't any longer riding the high of hosting a playoff game for the first time in years. This was simply a matchup of two teams that look more and more like even matches.

After four games, the series is tied, and the Bucks have even outscored the Hawks by five points overall. Tonight's win guarantees a Game Six on Friday at the BC. Worst-case scenario is that they will be playing to force a Game 7. Best-case scenario is they are playing to close out the series.

Not bad scenarios.

But first there is a little 688 mile trip to Atlanta, where the Bucks have lost and lost and lost all three games this season. And where they will have to win eventually if they want to win the series. Sooner rather than later.

Star-divide

THREE BUCKS

Carlos Delfino. In the spirit and form of fellow Argentinian number tens Maradona and Messi, Delfino broke out of a series-long slump with superstar flair. You see, in Argentina, in fútbol, wearing #10 on your back is the ultimate honor, and while some pretty good guys have worn #23 in hoops, there is no basketball equivalent.

The point is this: Delfino delivered an absolutely tip-top performance, and as the one guy we were all waiting for to make it happen, this feels oh-so-satisfying. He caught fire from outside early and often, and threw down the play of the night with a ferocious slam dunk on Zaza Pachulia.

'Los hit an otherwordly 6-8 from downtown after making 2-11 on threes in the first three games of the series. Building on a couple timely second-half triples in Game 3, he wasted little time tonight, making three from outside in the first quarter to cancel out Mike Bibby's three bombs. And he stayed hot, ripping apart the nets for 22 emphatic points on 14 shots.

Brandon Jennings. A firefly zipping through the spring Milwaukee sky, Brandon illuminated the Bradley Center in unfamiliar style and familiar grace. The slight, three point artist bullied his way to five first half layups. This was quite the time for Jennings to learn how to finish in traffic, over big guys, at the rim.

Young Buck torched the Hawks in Game One, delivering one of the finest playoff debuts ever. But it was a perimeter-based game during which he made four from outside and plenty more step-back jumpers. Tonight, it was all around the basket for Brandon. Jennings made nine field goals, and not only were none threes, none were from outside 15 feet. If you've been following his rookie journey, this is the next step.

The Bucks went six straight mid-fourth quarter possessions without a basket -- until Brandon Jennings stumbled and then floated a nine-footer in to put the Bucks in front 94-86.

The best possible shot I could think -- the floater. Once I made the first one, came back down and made another one. That's just one of the best shots I have right now.

Floater? His shot right now? Confidence is building. He's getting cheered when he comes into games, when he goes out of games, and the swagger is approaching November levels. Look out.

Also: Six assists and one turnover.

John Salmons. Here is what I really liked: Salmons attempted a three pointer 56 seconds into the game, the team's first field goal attempt. And he didn't shoot another from outside in 41 more minutes on the court. Instead, he found other ways to make it work.

After scoring an absurdly efficient 22 points on 11 shots on Saturday, he scored an even more absurdly efficient 22 points on 9 shots tonight. These 22 were far more quiet than Delfino's 22,  probably because eight of John's 22 came at the free throw line in the final minute and five seconds to ice the game. But let's not belittle the value  of having someone who makes all eight free throws to ice the game.

Salmons, as usual, played the most minutes (41:58) on the Bucks for a reason, and he again outplayed Joe Johnson, no small feat.

THREE NUMBERS

44-26. Probably the biggest concern of all the big post-Bogut concerns was how the Bucks would score inside, how they would get easy buckets. And for a while, they simply didn't. Tonight Milwaukee outscored Atlanta 44-26 in the paint, and the conversion rates are even more striking.

The Hawks shot 13-29 (.448) in the paint while the Bucks made 22-34 (.647). Without 'Drew roaming on the inside, it seemed the Bucks had little chance to defend the paint or score inside it. Check and check.

87.5 % The Bucks made 28-32 (.875) free throws, making more from the line (28) than the Hawks attempted (21), and at a great percentage. Who are these guys.

Skiles, pre-game:

We are the only team in the shot-clock era to make the playoffs when our opponents have made more free throws than we've attempted. And in this series, they've made more than we attempted.

2. Two blocks for the Hawks. Josh Smith had five blocks alone in Game One.

THREE GOOD

Bradley Center. The place was positively rockin'. From Josh Smith getting booed into submission during the pregame introductions to a "Let's Go Bucks" chant that started the game louder than anything than during the already-loud Game 3, this was pure euphoria from start to finish.

A "FEAR THE DEER" chant shook the building late in the game, and about 45 minutes after the final whistle I could still hear the same chant as Brandon Jennings and Carlos Delfino sat to answer questions from the media. That wasn't just because it was still ringing in my ears, either, the fans tonight were just that pumped for that long.

Filling in for Bogut. So, so much went right in Game 3 that I wrote 2,000+ words and neglected to mention the tremendous nights of Kurt Thomas and Dan Gadzuric. My bad / They're good.

For the second game in a row, Thomas and Gadzuric outplayed Al Horford and Zaza Pachulia and I just want to copy/paste plaster that all over the screen. I don't think even the idealists saw this coming.

Dan used those go-go-Gadzuric arms to swat shots, gather offensive boards, bother Josh Smith on the block, even drain a side jumper. Frank and I watched Gadz hit jumpers all throughout warmups, but it still always seems so improbable in gametime. This is the best we have seen from Gadzuric in years, and years, and years.

And Thomas?

He's now 7-8 (.875) from the field in the past two games, and has somehow gotten the better of Al Horford (8 points, 8 rebounds) in both of the home games. We're talking about a 37 year-old who was an afterthought in the Richard Jefferson trade repeatedly outplaying a 23 year-old All-Star -- on the statsheet, and on all of the other levels, too.

Before Game 3, Skiles spoke about how the Bucks weren't playing like themselves in Atlanta, noting just two charges drawn. Well, in one of the most crucial plays of the game, up 101-95 with just over a minute to go, Thomas drew a charge on Jamal Crawford.

Thomas, post-game:

We just try to keep them on their heels, instead of their toes.

Thomas played like the guy who was in the heart of all those Knicks playoff series in the late 1990's and early 2000's tonight, getting all tangled up with the increasingly frustrated frontcourt of Horford and Smith in the paint, laughing his way (here's looking at you, Bibby) to another win.

Take it away, Kurt:

I just thought it was a pretty good shot by Bibby. I guess I can tell he's been in the weight room... But it's okay.

Pivotal Game 4. Often you hear Game 5 is the big one, but tonight was really it in this series.

In playoff history, only 8 of 189 (4.2 %) of teams have come back to win after trailing 3-1. That's what the Bucks were facing with a loss. Instead, it's 2-2, which obviously is 50 % looking at things the same way. And while the Hawks retain a decided advantage with home court, the Bucks now have hope.

THREE TWO BAD

Bibby's one dimension. Still haven't conquered it.

This game marked the third time this year that Mike Bibby has rained in three triples in the first quarter alone against the Bucks. The first two times ended in losses. This time Carlos Delfino saved the day, but let's close out on Bibby. He doesn't do much of anything else. Tonight he made 5-7 from outside, 0-4 on other field goals, and 0-0 at the line.

Georgia on my mind. The Hawks haven't lost in Atlanta since February 26. That was two months ago. Good grief.

THREE PHOTOS

Smudge_medium

Mmg_medium

Craque_medium

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Jennings Ass-Mouth...err TO ratio

Rookie playoff series debut. 16-5. From your point guard. The guy values the rock like it’s his grandma’s wedding ring. I have no expectations for this series, but I’m absolutely giddy at the prospects of our fully healthy team next year. I wonder if John Salmons will be back (and I think many on here know I don’t believe we should mortgage the future for a guy who not 6 months ago, couldn’t crack the #8 seed’s weak guard rotation). But Salmons’ absence inferred, there’s little doubt that this team will be a true contender for the East crown next year (and Wade/Lebron/Bosh could be gone….in VERY far-fetched theory). Jennings/Bogut… The Jenogut! ANd if we could flip Redd/Danny G./Expo Generic contract for a Carmelo/Nene package…well I would put that nucleus against any team, East/West.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Apr 27, 2010 1:58 AM CDT reply actions  

By the way...

I haven’t seen two players (the Jenogut) simply OWN the BC since…Jesus/Cassell? From the infamous monocle to Squad 6, the BC has a “Scorched Earth” feel for invaders. Caveat Invaders! Even if you succeed, it’s a Pyrrhic victory.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Apr 27, 2010 3:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Danny Gadz

Speaking of which, could the Bogut injury actually be a small blessing, considering that Danny Gadz has finally reached indifferent trade value.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Apr 27, 2010 2:59 AM CDT reply actions  

?

And also, whose value is higher, Ersan or the Prince? Ersan is an un-guardable nightmare when he’s on, simply a pain in the umm Super Bowl ring when he’s not. The Prince is an absolute defensive trump to “un-guardable forwards” when he’s on, while simply a pain on the glass when he’s not.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Apr 27, 2010 3:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

tonight Jennings made me believe........

that was a sterling play off caliber point guard performance……….attacked the defenses weaknesses, picked them apart, got his team mates involved hit his runners and jumpers and floaters outstanding……..kid loves the spotlight in the right way

ROY who cares……. I wouldnt trade him for the world

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 3:55 AM CDT reply actions  

from the little bit Ive read about Salmons re-upping

it seems like both parties are on the same page regarding getting something done….but who knows what the offers are like for ‘other’ free agents once LBJ stays with the Cavs, Wade stays with Miami and then Bosch, Joe Johnson, Stoudemire, Boozer are suddenly the ‘star’ (add sarcasm) options….

Salmons seems smart enough to fit in with his role, whatever that may be, clutch scorer, facilitator, Bogut/Jennings side kick………so as long as its not a ridiculous 3 year deal I suppose we will have to take it cos they seem to want to get it done

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 3:59 AM CDT reply actions  

I don’t want it to seem like I don’t think Salmons has been the best scorer on this team sans Bogut, but I continually wonder what happened in Chi-town and also Sac-town. I think he’s a good locker room presence, but he how is he going to react when he’s the #4 option behind Jennings-Bogut-Ersan? But that’s a stressor for after this season. All I know is that watching our BJ3 become a monarch this postseason is something to behold.

Chicks Dig The Long Ball.

by ILuvDaBush on Apr 27, 2010 5:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

46 + 2-and-counting wins

Phenomenal season.

Scattered comments:

Watching Jennings (especially when he was turning Zaza into repeated baskets) I had the small flash that he is indeed the Difference Maker. The immaculate ROY who has the special factor to raise our current team to significance. Not just sparks us but flames us to play with the big boys – without our currently having a usual complement of NBA playoff talents. I trust he realizes that this is a storybook season for him, and for us. He’s convinced me that he really believes Milwaukee is a good spot for him to start his NBA career. That’s obvious. I’m not convinced either way that he’ll want to be here long term (how deep are his roots in urban culture? will he develop Jabbar-like longings?). Perhaps it depends on whether Hammond continues development of the kind of team that Jennings loves. However it plays out, Jennings makes the sometimes-flat NBA game electric, and he’s doing it for the Milwaukee Bucks.

If Atlanta is likely losing Joe Johnson, perhaps they are likely holding on to Childress. Perhaps Hammond now doesn’t think he can add Childress off season. Perhaps that’s a factor in signing Salmons. A 3 or 4 year contract seems long, but if Hammond is convinced that John doesn’t have to be freshly traded to play well, then it might be a good signing. Make the correct call, Mr. Hammond. Can a new contract start at or even below what Salmons is scheduled to receive next season (so we preserve the little cap we have) and then jump in 2011 when Redd, etc. are off the books?

I have no formal prediction for Wednesday’s game. Do have a guesstimate of odds. I would have thought our chances of winning there were 30%. Now I’d say the chances are 50%. The Hawks know they can win at home. But on the other hand they have re-learned how weak they are as a team. That’s a silent truth they can’t easily get out of their heads. And our coach is great at building a team and giving it effective strategies.

Wednesday is must-watch basketball.

by unklchuk on Apr 27, 2010 8:25 AM CDT reply actions  

I think we need to deliver a "knockout punch" at some point in the next game...

Something that will take the crowd out of the game and get the mentally weak Hawks to hang their heads…

We can’t grind it out on Atlantas home court with them IMO…

by Superelkman on Apr 27, 2010 7:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Salmons + Childress

Before the game yesterday Hammond restated their desire to keep Salmons but said something to the effect of it would be tough to get an extension done in time. Whether that’s because his agent is getting greedy or the Bucks just want to manage expectations…you be the judge.

As for Chill, when I exchanged emails with the guys at Peachtree Hoops they made it sound like Childress was unlikely to return so long as Woodson is around. Not sure if there’s any chance Woodson could be fired (maybe if the Bucks pull off a shocker?).

by Frank Madden on Apr 27, 2010 9:34 AM CDT via mobile reply actions  

cnn had quite a good write up on Childress's progress in Europe

I think Salmons deserves or has earned some credit points regarding his Bulls performance….with regard to VDN coaching all the reports and scouts say his x & o’s are juvi quality…..and also the Bulls management is the epitome of dysfunctional they really dont want the team to do that well do they?…………….the Bulls have made the play offs in spite of everything and whilst I dont rate VDN as a head coach…I do admire his ability to keep on keeping………..

and Salmons seems like he has enough introspection and self analysis, smarts, basketball IQ whatever you want to call it to see what situation he has himself in at the moment with a team on the rise, where he is a valuable member and he can play a positive role on an upcoming team………..after a somewhat nomadic career here is a chance to put some roots down…..he has to weigh that up ultimately I guess

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

I dont see Childress as a direct swap for Salmons anyway right?

Childress is more of a utility guy…..I wouldnt mind him taking Stacks minutes….But as a efficient scorer ala Salmons I dont see it

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 12:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I would add Childress as a rotation guy for his athleticism and versatility but...

we would still need a scorer… if we lose Salmons there are really not many of them in FA…

Although… with Jennings and ’Sova all a year older they could more than pick up the slack so I am not too sure that w/o Salmons we would be in horrible shape…

We do need a few more rotation guys though…. especially backing up Bogut

by Superelkman on Apr 27, 2010 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I like Salmons in that he takes the pressure of Jennings and Bogut to force stuff....

Salmons can get his shot, create a little, take a big shot, So the other guys can go about there business and he shown he can pick his spot and read the game well enough to adjust so it will be interesting

definitely like Childress for his versatility, and he was always a glue type of guy in Atlanta, but again he earns probably more over there than he would get here so……….

hopefully 15th draft pick can sort out our big man back up problems, but having said that there are a few talented guys hiding away and rotting on rosters and you figure Skile’s and co can rejuvenate and get the most out of them

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 9:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

more Salmons/Childress

“it would be tough to get an extension done in time”

My question might be: in time for what? To avoid Salmons renouncing the last year of his contract and becoming a free agent? That might be a good business move, depending on whether GMs concentrate on his play for the Bucks or on his up-down career. We could still sign him then, I’d think, but it likely would be a new contract, not an extension.

To me, this is another of those Must Determine Value situations. Weigh expected performance against cost; consider all the other options. Make a choice in the gray area. IMO Hammond is pretty good at appreciating players without overvaluing them.

“Childress was unlikely to return so long as Woodson is around”

Did they squabble? I’d have thought a Childress-type player would make a coach’s job a little easier. I’d think that’s why Hammond likes him. I read the game story in the Atlanta J-C last night. The comments following made it sound like Woodson is unpopular but expected to return. If I was Hawks management, even if I had reasons to bring Woodson back, I don’t think I’d pay much attention to his wishes.

by unklchuk on Apr 27, 2010 10:07 AM CDT reply actions  

1) I agree Chill is not a straight swap for Salmons. Comparable from a position standpoint, but very similar styles. Salmons fits in while adding the kind of scoring knack the Bucks don’t have; Childress is more of a classic Styles-type super glue guy. We probably need more of the Salmons type at this point, but Chill is notably younger as well. Doesn’t have to be an either/or given we’ll have the MLE and Bird rights to use on Salmons.

2) At this point the Bucks know Salmons is opting out unless they extend him, and if they did reach an extension I have to think it would involve waiving the 10/11 option year and giving him a new, higher salary next year (max of just over $7 million given his $6.4 million deal this year). Keep in mind that (barring some major roster reshuffling this summer), it’s in the Bucks’ best interest to pay Salmons more next year when they don’t have cap space anyway vs. pay him bigger dollars in the future years of a multi-year deal. That makes him easier to trade down the road and leaves more cap space in 2011. One problem with an extension is that you’re limited to 110.5% of this year’s salary, so if you want to get cute with a deal that declines, you can’t pay him off as easily next year. But if Salmons just opts out the Bucks can sign him for more using their Bird rights.

3) Not sure what the history was with Woodson, but Childress probably didn’t appreciate backing up Williams when by most standards he was the better player. Perhaps JJ leaving would increase everyone’s willingness for a reunion.

by Frank Madden on Apr 27, 2010 12:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Salmons: an independent thinker?

I have no idea what he’ll do.

He may feel he’s found a good fit, where his game is needed and appreciated, Might opt for stability here at a little less than max money that might be offered elsewhere.

Might feel this is a once-in-a-career opportunity to maximize income and/or join an established championship contender.

Either would be sensible choices.

(BTW a lot of mockery was made about Hammond/Skiles “changing the culture” for the Bucks. I’ve always thought that matters – matters even more in a small market. These are human beings choosing where they’re going to live and work. I believe Milwaukee’s changed culture gives them a much better shot at good players like Salmons choosing the Bucks.)

by unklchuk on Apr 27, 2010 10:17 AM CDT reply actions  

also lets not overlook Luke Ridnour

he has played an under rated role this year…..really adapting well to going to the bench for Jennings and adapting his game accordingly…….I guess you have to assume he saw the writing on the wall or Skile’s pretty much told him after pre season Jenning’s is getting the bulk of minutes at pg and he has upped his shooting percentages and provided exactly the steady hand off the bench that the Bucks require when Jenning’s is having a break….it’s pretty admirable………It will be interesting to see what happens with him Id like him back if the contract is reasonable

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

He’s a very tough call. Statistically this has been a complete fluke year, but even if he’s not shooting 48% he’s a quality backup. I just worry that a team like the Knicks with craploads of cap room gets desperate to add a respectable PG (whether or not they get a big name FA). Do you want to be paying a backup PG $4-5 million over the next three years? Very difficult call. Wouldn’t be shocked if Luke gets a starting gig somewhere, even though I don’t think he’s really starting material anymore.

by Frank Madden on Apr 27, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah tough call he is earning around $6.5 now

and I guess he has to look at it as his last chance to get a decent contract and he is coming off a pretty good year, personally Id like him around and some insurance and support for Jennings, otherwise I guess we start looking at guys like Blake & co

I guess we take last year with Sessions and 4 years at $16 was too much for Hammonds……I guess they value Ridnour more not sure what they want to pay essentially a steady bench guy

think Frank might be right though other teams might size him up and throw him a reasonable bone

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

if we can keep him around for cheaper i'd be ok with that but otherwise we can't get caught in the rebuilding/trying to make the playoffs rut that only gets us the 8th seed every other year....

if any of these guys are going to cash-strap us in the future without making us a top 4 seed then they have to be let go…

we need to keep building cap-sensibly and from the ground up…

by Superelkman on Apr 28, 2010 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hello Milwaukee...We have a Future!

Man, I’m loving watching the Bucks play tough in the face of adversity (no Bogut; down 2-0 with neither game all that close). Hopefully the guys will continue to listen to Skiles as they grow over the years. Hopefully the young guys (jennings/ersan/bogut) will continue to work on improving their games in the offseason. I think the Hawks have to be a little concerned about game 5 and I think the Bucks now believe they can win that game. GO BUCKS!!!

As for Salmons, testing the market is just smart business. However, I suspect that Salmons will give the Bucks a chance to match an offer because he sees himself as a good fit with this team. I do believe some team is going to offer him a 4 year deal starting at $7-8 mil….so keeping him will not be cheap….but I think keeping Salmons is critical. His presence helps keep the pressure off young BJ…and he gives the Bucks a legit 2 way wing. Those type of guys don’t exactly grow on trees. Will folks claim that its a bad contract in year 4? maybe…but, by then, if he can help a young group make 2 or 3 long playoff runs, who cares?

Some have questioned why Salmons wasn’t doing well in Chicago earlier this year. From what I’ve read in other places, a lot of that blame falls on their coach in not using Salmons correctly. However, Salmons was very good all year last year (in both places) so he didn’t just come out of nowhere with this performance.

by hunter11 on Apr 27, 2010 11:38 AM CDT reply actions  

4 years - 28 million for Salmons... No thank you...

Don’t get me wrong.. Salmons is just what the doctor ordered this year but he is in no way worth 7 mill per over 4 years… Salmons always tends to play well at the right times but look at his numbers the rest of the year… i love the guy as a player for the bucks and he seems like a really good person but we can’t and shouldn’t pay him that much for that long… can’t dig ourselves back into salary cap hell just as we are about to come out of it…

by Superelkman on Apr 27, 2010 7:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fun to watch

Don’t get me wrong. I am a huge Jennings supporter. I can’t wait until the rookie slips stop next year. Like the double dribble which I thought was grade schoolish and the steal which was NBA, but he still made the open layup a close call.
Secondly, it is great to see Dan Gadz earn a paycheck. Maybe the bench time this season will make him hungry again.
Third. Thomas was a warrior. Who couldn’t see how tired that guy was. But he sucked it up to give his best.
Thanks to the Bucks for giving 100% every night and stepping up the the challenges.

by Fun in Wi on Apr 27, 2010 12:20 PM CDT reply actions  

Thomas was in every way the alpha male on the court yesterday...

he won the physical, mental, and emotional battles all night with his much younger, more athletic Hawks counterparts…

by Superelkman on Apr 27, 2010 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree the double dribble was like hang on I havent seen that since High School or at least a Will Ferrel movie

I think its pretty simple for Dan….as we have discussed before….rebound, defend, run the floor, bring some controlled energy, limit the bonehead plays and he is going to get minutes….he’ll never live up to that contract but at this point it’s not a factor KT needs some help and so far he done ok

by ILIKEBJ'S on Apr 27, 2010 12:45 PM CDT reply actions  

I have been watching the NBA for a long time

I don’t think I have ever seen a double dribble with both hands ever, called in an NBA game. Or if it happened it didn’t get called. I wonder if the ref and his ref buddies have a pool to see if that actually happens. If so the guy who blew the whistle probably collected 20 years worth of pool money collections. Jennings is like a chess player on the court and it wouldn’t ever suprise me to learn he does stuff like that to get in the opponents head..:)

by Fun in Wi on Apr 27, 2010 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Another Golden Opportunity Missed
Small
FSN alternate channel for Bucks game Monday
Kksp2_small
A theory on Jennings.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer