Bucks 91, Hawks 87: Comeback shocks Atlanta
Seriously?
Yep.
In a season full of mediocrity on the road, the Bucks sure picked a hell of a time to get things together, didn't they? And the Hawks? Well, they've picked a heck of a time to lose their way. No, the series is by no means over, but a week after Atlanta was brimming with confidence after consecutive, comprehensive home wins, the Hawks are staring at what seemed like the unthinkable: a game six in Milwaukee where their playoff lives will be at stake.
It's not that a Bucks win was inconceivable, not after the way they dominated the Hawks twice in Milwaukee. But we also knew that was kind of Atlanta's deal--awesome at home (36-7) but, um...sketchy on the road (18-25). Maybe Atlanta felt it could just flip the switch like they did in games one and two, or perhaps they simply expected the Bucks wouldn't have the firepower to dig themselves out of a second half hole that didn't seem to shrink no matter what they did. Down 13 late in the third and nine with just four minutes left in the game, the Bucks were fighting but just not landing enough punches.
But aided by Atlanta's self-destruction, the final four minutes saw the Bucks make big shots (Delfino and Salmons), big hustle plays (Ilyasova twice), and enough big free throws (notably by Brandon Jennings) to turn a nine point deficit into an improbable and amazing four point win. Get ready for an absolutely electric game six at the Bradley Center on Friday.
Honestly, it didn't have to be this way for Atlanta. Though Brandon Jennings was again putting on an early show to keep the Bucks nipping at the Hawks' heels in the first half, the Hawks got huge performances from Marvin Williams (22 pts, 8/10 fg) and Al Horford (25 pts, 11 rebs)--two guys who had been notably absent in the state of Wisconsin. But Joe Johnson (6/16 fg) and Josh Smith (3/8, 7 pts) were blanketed by Salmons and Luc Mbah a Moute, and Atlanta was even misfiring in transition (12-10 Bucks edge). The Bucks broke up a number of first half fast break chances, the sort of chances that Atlanta thrived on in the series' first two games.Still, when Josh Smith ripped a long jumper with four minutes left it looked like curtains for the Bucks--down 82-73, there hadn't been much indication the Bucks could score enough points to get back in it. And so it began. John Salmons shrugged off his cold shooting and drove right at the Hawks to draw the foul and make a pair of free throws, and Smith somehow lost the ball on the ensuing possession with nothing standing between him and a dunk. Salmons then calmly drained a wing three off a screen to cut the lead to four, and the Hawks showed their nerves again on the next possession. Jamal Crawford, fresh off the 6th Man of the Year award he received earlier in the evening, got into the lane but somehow missed his layup off the front iron, the kind of miss that seemed a microcosm of another night of struggles (4/18 fg).
Jennings and Salmons added three free throws to bring the Bucks to within a point at 82-81, and then the game really turned. Kurt Thomas slid in front of a driving Johnson to draw JJ's sixth foul with 2:15 left, and Ilyasova got free inside to give the Bucks their first lead with less than two minutes remaining. The Hawks looked a bit lost with the ice-cold Crawford now their go-to guy, and a mystifying three-point brick from Josh Smith only underscored the Hawks' disarray. Horford gathered the rebound but couldn't put a contested shot past Thomas, setting up perhaps the Bucks' biggest shot of the night.
Jennings drove left and rushed a floater that barely caught rim, but Ersan Ilyasova (7 pts, 7 rebs) rushed in to grab the rebound and whip the ball into the right corner for Delfino, who up until that point was struggling through a forgettable 1/6 shooting night. Bibby moved over to let Delfino know he was there, but after considering a pass back to reset, Carlitos did what (realistically) he probably shouldn't have done. Perhaps not sure if the shot clock had been reset, Delfino said screw it and launched a three over Bibby. And, thank God, he buried it, capping a 13-0 run that Atlanta simply couldn't recover from.
Three Bucks
John Salmons: 45 min, 19 pts, 6/17 fg, 2/3 threes, 5/6 ft, 6 reb, 5 ast, 2 to, 1 stl, 1 blk
A rough night shooting the ball didn't prevent Salmons from doing a bit of everything. He played excellent defense on Johnson (6/16, 13 pts), initiated most of the Bucks' offense with his driving game (5 ast), and scored eight in the fourth to help the Bucks make their comeback. Jennings is the more charismatic showman, but Salmons was again the engine room of the Bucks' offense, which for all their struggles ended up slightly above average from an efficiency perspective (106.5 pts/100). Milwaukee might not have a real star, but Salmons frequently plays one on TV, doesn't he?
Luke Ridnour: 18 min, 15 pts, 5/7 fg, 1/1 threes, 5/5 ft, 2 reb, 1 ast, 4 stl, 1 to
All the talk will be about Jennings, but it was Ridnour who was just as important in the game's final three quarters. He scored nine in the final 13 minutes, and he also helped on defense (!) by picking up four steals, including three in the first half when Atlanta was trying to run the Bucks out of the building.
Brandon Jennings: 43 min, 8/20 fg, 2/7 threes, 7/8 ft, 4 reb, 3 ast, 2 to, 1 stl, 1 blk
Jennings started the game on fire, ripping his first five shots and scoring 12 straight Bucks points midway through the first. He finished the period with 14 but went a bit cold from there on out, hitting just 3/15 including only 1/8 to close the game. Unlike game one, Skiles didn't give him a second of rest in the second half, and while it didn't help his shot-making he was clutch from the stripe, calmly hitting all four of his free throws in the final 18 seconds.
Three Numbers
15. The Bucks again got the best of the Hawks at the free throw line (+10 makes overall) and had an incredible 15-0 scoring differential at the line in the fourth.
6. Joe Johnson has fouled out of three games in his regular season career (699 games), none in the last two years. So no one would have predicted the Hawks' leader and number one crunchtime option would be condemned to watching the game's final 2:15 from the bench. The Hawks were still up a point when Johnson plowed over Thomas for an offensive foul, but six straight points immediately after JJ's dismissal sent the Bucks on their way--and had the Hawks looking completely lost offensively.
1. Amazingly, the Bucks need just one win to book a date with the Magic in the second round. By the way, I had to think about that for a moment because I really hadn't thought about what would happen if the Bucks, you know, actually won the series. Dare to dream, people.
Three Good
Clutch. "If the deficit were any bigger I’d say it was over. Do-able, but very tough." That was my expert opinion in the game thread after the Bucks finished the third quarter down eight. Good thing I didn't say it was over. The funny part is that the Bucks didn't whittle away the Atlanta lead slowly over the course of the final period--maybe they were just lulling the Hawks to sleep? Well, whatever. The Bucks got huge plays of the hustle, skill, and concentration variety in the closing minutes, all while Atlanta looked completely shell-shocked. We had been waiting all series for a close game to test each team's late game mettle, and we finally got it. While Atlanta looked to be sorely missing Johnson in the final two minutes, take nothing away from the Bucks. Everyone on the court made big plays, perhaps none bigger than Delfino's corner triple to make it a two possession game with 75 seconds left.
Aggression. The Bucks really should be a one-dimensional jump-shooting team without Bogut, and it'd be easy to get discouraged with Atlanta blocking their shots left and right. But the Bucks just kept attacking tonight and saw their stubbornness rewarded with a massive edge at the free throw line in the fourth quarter.
Guards. Jennings, Salmons and Ridnour simply carried the Bucks with 59 of their 91 points. Before the series I questioned whether Skiles would be able to get away with his small double-PG look against a Hawks club that can go very big with Crawford and Johnson in the backcourt. But the Bucks hid their frequent size disadvantage well and good thing, too--Ridnour was huge with seven of his 15 in the final period.
Three No Bad
You think I'm going to find stuff to complain about tonight?
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
the bucks have grabbed the league’s attention, and on friday they can take center stage. 1 more!
"I would say my biggest flaw, my Achilles heel is my tireless work ethic"-Kenny Powers
PLEASE beat 'dem nasty Hawks.
the League and everyone else is taking notes……
and with no BOGUT !!!!!! (yes I am Aussie, had to throw that in)
Great win. A bit puzzling.
Bucks didn’t play all that well. Neither team did. After 3 quarters I had a moment’s impulse to prepare for a loss. Then I realized how contrary that was to this whole season. Realized that a 4th quarter comeback was almost to be expected. When it finally started, you could smell it. Even when the Hawks were making “discouraging” baskets (like their center’s banked 3-pointer) the comeback seemed alive. The Bucks had found their will, and their will was the strongest thing on the court.
I know my team has so many intangibles that they stick out all over the place, but the small puzzle for me is the extent to which the Hawks’ weaknesses allowed the Bucks to win. Clearly, the Bucks are better than they look. And the Hawks are worse than they look. But I’m a little curious how many of the other 14 playoff teams the Bucks could have beaten with tonight’s game?
But if tonight is a time for simple celebration, then… never mind. Go Bucks!
I'm EXTREMELY nervous about Game 6 but also really excited
and more than anything I want it to be Friday. The Bradley Center is going to be so effing loud…
"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne
by dishingoutdimes on Apr 29, 2010 12:14 AM CDT reply actions
wow
The only thing the Hawks have over the Bucks is talent. While Atlanta has 5 of the 7 best players on the court, they are constantly out coached and out hustled by Milwaukee.
Isn't it time
to revisit the question of Atlanta’s talent? One reason the Bucks are having so much success is that the Hawks are not as talented as advertised. Joe Johnson is a given, but the way Luc MaM is handling Smith and the difficulties that Ersan presents every time he’s on the court tells me that the Hawks are a lot more limited than a lot of people seem to think and that Bucks fans are selling our guys a little short.
Jennings and Ridnour were brilliant in Game 5, very much in control of the game throughout.
I thought Josh Smith was the closest thing to LeBron?
Atlanta’s owner said so…
by Frank Madden on Apr 29, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions
touche.......I think Woodson's rigidity in his plays and his rotations has been exposed
honestly Im rooting for the Bucks obviously and Im screaming not another isolation play honestly
just as a basketball fan cmon when you have Horford gunning it......why why when JJ gets fouled out why would you let Jamal Crawford dictate your playoff destiny
you cant defend it and as much as I admire Woodson’s luxurious goatee I cant defend it it’s weak
couldn't agree more
They are increadibly talented, and they don’t have a brain between themselves or their coach. Skiles in like the Chess-master compared to Woodsen.
Go Beer, I mean Bucks
by Take Back Our Bucks on Apr 29, 2010 10:58 AM CDT up reply actions
It is unbelievable to me that they run as many Iso's as they do...
If that team could work together as a unit there is zero doubt in my mind that they would be a legit contender and perhaps the top team in the league… This may seem like an exageration but I honestly believe Woodsen costs them about 5 games a year by not running any set offense really ever…
If Skiles is coaching that team I wouldn’t doubt they could win 60 a year… 53 this year by purely being more talented than other teams… if they ever do start playing together watch out but it isn’t going to happen until they can get a coach to rein them in…
by Superelkman on Apr 29, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions
The only reason he has kept his job is because they have improved in record each year in large part to young players naturally developing...
I feel the same thing is happening to Scott Brooks where he seems like a good coach because of circumstance and not because he is actually a good coach…
by Superelkman on Apr 29, 2010 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Incredibly talented?
Is that really the type of team you would build?
no center. Horford will be a good big man but he’s young, and too small for the real centers of the league.
an aging, slow-footed point guard who’s always been a good shooter but is a terrible defender and scarcely resembles a playoff point guard
6th man who’s always been a streaky shooter and a terrible defender
Marvin the man Williams?
Zaza – yeah, we’d have liked to have signed him in 2005 and he’s decent support help. Sometimes I think they’re a better team with Zaza on the court than Horford — which goes back to Horford being young and inexperienced ….
So you’re left with Johnson and Smith. Johnson’s a legit star but Smith’s a basket case who is currenty being outplayed by our two guys – Luc and Ersan. That’s no knock on Smith, really — Luc and Ersan are talented, tenacious young players.
Horford is pretty damn good but even he has admitted he would love a legit center so he could move to his more natural power forward slot
Bogut & Horford yes please
How many "real" centers left?
Bogut’s one, but Horford outplayed him in both games they played against each other this year. So aside from Dwight and Shaq (who are bigger than everyone anyway), are there that many bigs Horford is too small to guard?
by Frank Madden on Apr 29, 2010 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Bogut?
Horford had 18 pts pts and 11 rebs TOTAL in games 3 and 4. He’s young, he’s inconsistent, he’s being banged around by veterans who are stronger than he is, bigger than he is and have been controlling the boards. We’re winning the rebounding game in this series without Bogut!!
He’s averaging 15 pts 7.8 rebs for the series — since when is that good from “a center.” It’s not. Horford’s got to play better against Kurt Thomas and Gadz, not Bogut or Howard.
I wouldn’t say Horford outplayed Bogues in Milw, and the Bucks did control both of those games. Horford’s certainly not one of the centers AB has had problems with – avg’d 21 vs Hawks in ‘08, 12 boards. Howard dominates Horford. The Cavs and Celtics frontlines are much bigger than the Hawks’. Chandler and Theo in Charlotte are more rugged centers than Horford, and hit the glass. Miami next year? They’re going to get bigger.
Joakim Noah is grabbing 17-18 rebs against the Cavs.
Atlanta was trying to have more playoff success in the East, weren’t they?
Rebounding
Focusing on Horford’s 7.8 rebs per game this series above — that’s really not very good for “a center” who plays 37 mins per game.
Horford definitely negated Boguts influence in their couple of games this season, not that he dominated himself
true true their are not that many true centers 7ft guys down on the block good point………but I suppose if you want to go deep into the play offs its a requisite I guess, that ability to play an inside out game…..even the suns found out during the year how much easier it is with Robin Lopez starting at center and allowing Amare to move over…..you push horford over then suddenly thats a big intimidating front line and I suppose it gets Marvin out of the starting line up
Horford's rebounding
at a rate about the same as his 9 playoff games last season. 13.3% …. His regular season reb.% is 16.3. So you can see what happens to him in the playoffs — he’s not as effective on the glass against the tougher teams. The Bucks have been outrebounding the Hawks in this series, and Horford’s hasn’t done a center’s job on the boards.
Woodson isn't really coaching the Hawks well but...
I’m not sure he thinks he can do anything with them. To me, he acts like a coach who’s stopped trying to develop a real team.
Was Larry Brown and the 76ers he was rumored to be joining as head coach? That may suggest that they think Woodson can do more coaching than is possible with his current team.
I’d hate to try to coach Josh Smith.
I thought woodson had made progress with Josh Smith they didnt but heads much this season
but as soon as the Prince switched onto him his head has been in the clouds you cant just glide by on talent alone it isnt enough in the playoffs
I'd hate to try to coach Josh too. (hawks fan here)
He is a BIG baby and he thinks he can go through the motions and still be good. His effort or lack of effort is sad. But I also think Mike Woodson is an idiot.
by BravesFanScout on Apr 29, 2010 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions
Josh Smith
is not as good as he thinks he is, is he? The guy’s a basket case and he’s just not altogether there — a lazy basketcase who can jump?
A smaller Charlie V with ups, maybe, but I think that’s not being fair to Charlie’s overall offensive game.
Charlie V is never going to finish 2nd in the defensive player of the year voting :)
by Frank Madden on Apr 29, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions
Very true — but Smith’s offensive game pales compared to Charlie’s post up and midrange game. Plus, Charlie’s a big 6’10"-6’11" and Smith is like 6’8"-ish. He’s a limited offensive option – unless the plan is to throw him lobs all game.
Josh isn’t supposed to be shooting three’s for Atlanta – that one under two minutes seemed intentionally rebellious.
id have to agree that three he chucked up at the end seemed like an f*** you to someone......Woodson? the crowd? karma? kismet? Fate?Life in general?
also.....hardly seen anything out Jeff Teague....
but Woodson not working him int the rotation or someone to change the pace and push the ball for the Hawks during the year was a huge mistake I feel……with their athleticism its a crime that they run so much half court stuff isolating Joe Johnson they could use some variety and the one guy they use off the bench Crawford pretty much does the same
Jeff Teague
is a much better defender than Bibby or Crawford, already. If he was a more regular part of their rotation Woodson could just throw him out there and see if he can stay in front BJ. Remember Tyronn Lue on Iverson in 2001? (AI was pretty banged up, though).
The Hawks were possibly considering signing Sessions last summer. He could have sped up the tempo for them. Resigning Bibby never made much sense. It just ensured that they would reach the ceiling they already knew was there. Time for the Hawks to move to another room.
I'm a hawks fan and I totally agree. Woodson is one of the worst coaches.
I also think Skiles has done a great job of making adjustments after the first two games, while Woodson has continued to play the same way. We keep switching on defense and it is playing into the Bucks hand. Horford and Smith can’t guard Jennings or Salmons. I also think the Bucks have played a lot harder than the Hawks. They want it more and if they win it on Friday they deserve it. The Hawks do not deserve to win this series with the lack of effort they have shown. If you guys finish it off on friday I’ll be cheering you guys on against the Mag.
by BravesFanScout on Apr 29, 2010 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks BFS
I wish I could say this series is over but I have a feeling the Hawks aren’t going to go quietly on Friday…hopefully it’s a good game either way.
by Frank Madden on Apr 29, 2010 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions
congrats guys
hope ya’ll can close it out at home! :)
Hello ladies. Look at your man. Now look at Brandon Roy. Now back at your man. Now back to Brandon Roy. Sadly, he is not Brandon Roy.
and when it came to deliver wow how great was that last 5 minutes…….so many highlights
KT with the charge on JJ for the 6th foul, Delfino burying the 3, clutch free throws from Jennings……….Prince onto Josh Smooth has completely taken his head out of the game hasnt looked the anywhere the same player…….And exposed Atlanta’s short rotation…..really if your relying on Crawford as one of your go to shooters down the stretch your going to live and die by the sword……
that kinda performance from Salmons kinda shows he can fit it in a number of ways, Joe Johnson had a quiet game apart from that third quarter mini duel with Salmons, but heck lets credit Salmons doing what he had to defensively …….and he has read Jenning’s play well picking his slack up as a passer and facilitator
thought Ridnour was clutch during the whole night when others were struggling was a heady and important performance
also for me Skiles is coach of the year.....brilliant the last three performances
showed he was adaptable enough with the small ball line up, at one stage it was Salmons, Jennings, Ridnour, Stack & Prince……played his cards right, even with foul trouble to KT & Gadz, brought back KT just at the right time…….sat Ridnour for Prince or Delfino? late and was questioned by someone here…..Oh wait that was me
giving Woodson a bath
Great win, Bucks
I guess you could have had 4 Bucks, because the D from Mbah a Moute on Smith was outstanding.
Biggest challenge for Skiles is to keep the team loose and relaxed, and keep them thinking like underdogs instead of feeling like the pressure is on them.
Dunking Dutchman
the way Jennings has led the team has been phenomenal.......the three guards have really complemented each other the last few games
surprised by Jennings reading of the game situation, when he had to he has taken the role of primary scorer in a couple of games when the offense couldnt get going, and in others he has been great in getting his team mates involved and getting them open looks…..been brilliant to watch
KT takin' charge!
That’s my slogan/t-shirt suggestion for tonight.
What an incredible game to watch. Kind of maddening that Barkley & friends are still tending to blame the Hawks for losing these games rather than giving credit to the Bucks — especially Thomas and Jennings — for their resilience and for picking the Hawks’ team psyche apart completely. Keep it up Friday!
Magic Fan here
man I am thrilled to see Bucks roll out like this without Bogut.
Its enjoy watching them play
"Just to remind you, Orlando made it to the finals last year without this guy. Crazy."~John Krolik
Bogut
This morning driving to work I found myself wondering what would have happened in the series if Bogut was healthy. Obviously, the immediate thought is they would be doing even better. But I wonder if Jennings would have still come out gunning the way he has a couple times this series or if they would look more to Bogut early. Maybe it would have worked out the same either way. I guess it’s a nice what-if to ponder.
Failure is just success rounded down.
I guess you have to look at it as the glass is half full.........
one thing we wouldnt have seen is so many highlights for the Dan Gadz end of year mix tape so Im grateful for that at least
Was going to quote...
…the comments I liked in this thread. But there are too many of them.
I wonder if color guys get paid Wall-Street-like bonuses for repeating themselves? Kevin McHale was going on and on about Salmons defense on Johnson. Thing is, he was right. That was BIG, and I respect Salmons even more for coming up with such a key clutch effort. I take that as a sign that his head and heart are in the right place on the court, and I want him on our team next season.
Our color guy (Kelly?) said some of the timeouts were dominated by Players – not Coaches – dominating with good advice. Bogut and Stackhouse specifically. Bogut telling Gadzuric not to worry about Bibby if he penetrated because Bibby would pass not shoot. I forget what Stackhjouse said, but it seemed smart too. If they bring him back next season, let it be as a player/coach.
The chemistry on this team is off the charts!
When we win we always have a different three guys step up...
Last night → Jennings, Salmons and Ridnour
'Sova again showing why he is one of my favorite Bucks by always getting his hands on rebounds and creating second chance points like he did with the board and kick to Delfino late in the game...
He is Charlie V with a motor and desire,
and tons cheaper too.
by Brick's house on Apr 29, 2010 11:39 AM CDT up reply actions
awesome
The bucks have a mentality that can put them on trajectory of being a great team. You can see it. Like the TNT gang pointed out, the team has def taken on the persona of the coach, and Hammond has done a superb job of putting players on the team that can dial in and be focused and on board with Skiles direction.
Let’s get a win at the Bradley Center and seal the deal!
Victoria est dulcis
The best part of the win was the looks on the Hawks faces when they realized they’d just been schooled.
My favorite thing in sports has always been victory over those who’ve dismissed you. Fear the Deer, hotlanta.
I think the best play was when Delfino hesitated on the corner three then said wtf and drilled it in front of Atlanta's bench
glorious……….a highlight to finally top Ilyasova’s 29 ft 3 pt shot with sacramento all over him on the road
Watching ESPN First Take
Jennings was good in his interview, humble, didn’t seem too confident.
Then they got to 1st and 10. Bruce Bowen (gag) and Eric Davis (former Cincy Reds player) were debating Skip Bayless.
Bowen and Davis BOTH said that the Bucks will be “overconfident” and they had picked the Hawks in 7. They proceeded to just talk about the Hawks for the next 4 minutes.
Bayless, to his credit, at least mentioned some players on the Bucks, and gave kudos to Skiles for his coaching. He said he’s worried about the Hawks (but that he roots for the Hawks).
Basically it turned into a discussion about how the Hawks are still better than the Bucks and should be expected to win because the Bucks are overconfident.
"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne
by dishingoutdimes on Apr 29, 2010 11:19 AM CDT reply actions
That's ridiculous.
… Bahahahahaha.
Go Rockets/Nets[CDR]/Bucks[Jennings]!
seriously by the time Atlanta and the analysts figure out the Bucks it will be all over
they just dont get this team and its brilliance
Bowen's probably still pissy
he got traded to MIL from the Spurs, and then waived.
ESPN, and the NBA in general, seem to have a longing to be done with small market teams once the regular season is over. After all, a successful team in ATL is worth more to the league and to a sports news network than a successful team in MIL.
And while I’m on the subject of ESPN, anyone else feel like they’ve got waaaaaaaaay more NBA-related content and opinion behind the Insider wall than they do for other sports?
But back to the series: it ain’t over yet. I could easily see an engaged Hawks team steal game 6 at the Bradley Center, and a repeat victory in ATL would not be an easy game 7 scenario to say the least. They’ve still got the front court advantage, and it’ll be a tough slog for us if ATL actually starts playing team ball again. Hopefully, that’ll remain a pretty big “if.”
Don't want to jinx anything...
but when was the last time there was an Eastern conference 1st round upset? I know it happens fairly frequently out west because the teams are so stacked out there, but I can not remember the last time there was a 1st round upset in the playoffs out east.
2007
Toronto lost to New Jersey in the 3-6 matchup, and Miami lost to Chicago (coached by Scott Skiles) in the 4-5 matchup.
"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne
by dishingoutdimes on Apr 29, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions
"talent"
Everybody keeps repeating the mantra that “the Hawks have more talent” or “the Bucks are the clearly inferior team.” What does that mean, exactly? That the Hawks could beat the Bucks in a jumping contest, or a footrace? This is basketball. Talent has to be defined as what wins basketball games. It isn’t like the Bucks’ three wins have been flukes, where the Hawks actually played better but lost due to bad luck. The Bucks are playing better basketball than the Hawks. Of course Scott Skiles has a lot to do with the Bucks’ success, but the players still have to execute. You could say that the Hawks would win easily if, for example, Josh Smith was smarter, but you could just as easily say that the Bucks would win easily if, for example, Brandon Jennings was bigger. I don’t get why people treat things like size and jumping ability as talents while treating things like smarts and toughness as something else. The Hawks could very well win this series in seven, and in doing so they might prove that they have more talent than the Bucks. But right now I’d say we’re gaining valuable evidence about which of these teams is really more talented, and it’s looking more and more like the Bucks are that team.
It's rough trade
I’ve been writing and blogging about these very things since the series started and after five games, with both teams standing on the court right next to each other — and people still won’t move off of “Atlanta has a size advantage.” Ersan Ilyasova and Luc Mbah a Moute could outplay Josh Smith for 20 more games and people would still be talking about how talented the Hawks are and how hardworking and scrappy the Bucks are. And how the Hawks aren’t taking advantage of their “size advantage.” There is no size advantage. Al Horford hauled in just 11 rebounds total in Games 3 and 4 because there is no size advantage in the paint for the Hawks.
Doc Rivers says: "Energy is a talent. Being Scrappy -that’s a talent. Those things are talents. I’m pretty sure he was talking about Ilyasova during one of the Bucks-Celtics games.
How's The Buzz Right Now?
As someone who isn’t in the city of Milwaukee right now (darn) just curious what the atmosphere is like around the city right now?
"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne
by dishingoutdimes on Apr 29, 2010 12:39 PM CDT reply actions
People now are aware that the Milwaukee Bucks exist. Honestly though, there is a buzz among casual sports fans and obviously the real fans are giddy. I expect chaos at the BC. Unfortunately I’m only going to be there about half an hour before tip rather than the standard 1.5 to 2 hours, no thanks to this 6:00 start…
WIth tomorrow night looming large,
tomorrow is gonna be the longest workday in history.
I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say this could possibly be the most anticipated Bucks game in nine years.
You trying to say Jesus Christ can't hit a curveball?
FEAR THE DEEEEEEER
GO BUCKS!
"Just to remind you, Orlando made it to the finals last year without this guy. Crazy."~John Krolik

by 
















