Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

Bucks Draft Possibilities - Part 2/3 - The 1st Round Wings


In part 2 of our look at the draft we will look at the potential wing players the Bucks could select with the 15th pick...

Star-divide

Xavier Henry 6'6'' 210 SG/SF - Solid shooting 2-guard who has a knack for playing within a team concept. Ability to create off the dribble in the NBA is in question but I think it will develop just fine as he is only 19 years old and could benefit from some coaching. Athleticism isn't elite but finishes well around the basket despite that. I believe he has much higher upside than he is given credit for. Gives good effort on the defensive end despite average lateral quickness. Pick Rating: 8/10, would be able to contribute immediately at the 2/3 and has a higher upside than most people believe especially when he learns to get to the rim. Another very highly regarded player out of high school would look good next to Brandon Jennings for years to come.

James Anderson 6'6'' 195 SG/SF - Anderson reminds me of a poor mans Rip Hamilton in that he is excellent at running off screens and hitting jumpers. Lets the game come to him and is extremely careful with the ball. Not elite at getting to the rim. Plays within a team concept well. Defensively, has the tools to succeed because of his height and large wingspan but hasn't shown any consistency on that end. Became a better player each year at OK State and performed well in most big games even when teams game planned against him. Pick Rating: 7.5/10, I like Anderson and think he will be an effective scorer in the NBA with the potential to become a lock down defender. His upside is good, not great.

Gordon Hayward 6'8'' 200 SF - Tweener. Played the 4 in college, projects to be a 3 in the pros. Decent ball handler. Hard-worker and physical for his size. Projects to be just an OK on defense as he makes up for slow feet with length and intensity. Surprisingly good finisher at the rim. Drastic dropoff in 3pt % from freshman to sophomore year is concerning. Should be a good shooter at some point in the pros. Only 20 so has some upside but won't ever be anything more than a servicable starter. Pick Rating: 3/10, No. We are overloaded with streaky shooting hybrid forwards and certainly do not need one with questionable defensive ability. Don't get me wrong, Hayward will probably be in somebodies rotation because he has some NBA skills(but with limited upside) but the Bucks don't need this type of player and should not draft him.

Paul George 6'8'' 210 SF - A true 3 who could play the 2 in the NBA due to his athleticism and length. Reminds me a lot of Danny Granger due to his propensity to shoot an insane amount of 3's(over 5 a game). Doesn't utilize his athletic ability to get to the rim nearly enough but should improve with coach. Poor handle which will make him turnover prone as a young player if asked to shoulder a playmaking role. Good vision and passer. Has good upside. Potential to be a lockdown defender. Pick Rating: 8.5/10, I would like to see George in a Bucks uniform as I believe he has the skills to contribute now and even more in the future. With some coaching, better shot selection, and work on his handle George can become a borderline all-star in the NBA.

Willie Warren 6'4'' 200 SG - Strong combo guard with an NBA-ready body. Takes poor shots but finishes them at a decent clip. Can create shots for himself better than nearly all players in this class. Poor defender. Ball stopper on offense. Turnover prone. Pick Rating: 4/10, Warren has some solid upside as a scorer if he can get his head on straight and learn to play within a team game; however, there are far better players to take at #15.

Avery Bradley 6'3'' 180 PG/SG - Undersized combo guard but has a decent wingspan so can play a little bigger than size. Supposedly has a great shot and shot well at the combine but his numbers in college were far less than impressive(43.2-FG%,37.5-3PT%,54.5-FT%). Very quick. Give incredible effort on the defensive end. Denies the ball and gives consistent effort. Too small to guard bigger 2's but will really be an asset guarding 1's and combo guards. Takes good shots but isn't a shot creator. Pick Rating: 5/10, Bradley is only 19 and has some upside. Has an incredibly unique skill set in that he is not your shot-chucking combo guard and that he plays good defense. Would be a good player off the bench with some upside but definitely not what the Bucks need.

Eliot Williams 6'4'' 175  SG - Unpolished guard who is a good on the ball defender. OK shooter. Very quick first step. Relied mostly on his athleticism to create shots for him and his teammates. Needs to be a betterball handler and work on most of the skill aspects of basketball. Pick Rating: 2.5/10, Too unproven of a prospect. Could develop into a solid starter due to age and athleticism but with better wings available I'll pass.

Luke Babbitt 6'9' 225 SF - Supremely good shooter. 50/40/90 guy last season. Best shooter in the last few drafts. Can hit shots off balance, has range, and utilizes a variety of shot-fakes. Not very quick and won't blow by guys off the dribble but is crafty and can get penetration because defenders have to close out on him or face the consequences. Hard worker with poor lateral quickness, similar to Hayward, on the defensive end and in the fact he is a tweener. Reminds me a lot of Keith Van Horn. Pick Rating: 6.5/10, I really like Babbitt and think he is the epitome of a smart, crafty, skilled basketball player. I can see him becoming an above average scorer and solid rebounder. A better version of Gordon Hayward IMO. His shooting is phenominal and I wouldn't mind having him on that alone. That said, we have too many guys that are tweeners and we don't need another.

Poll
Which player would you like the Bucks to select at 15?
Xavier Henry
59 votes
James Anderson
8 votes
Gordon Hayward
9 votes
Paul George
65 votes
Willie Warren
0 votes
Avery Bradley
1 votes
Eliot Williams
0 votes
Luke Babbitt
19 votes

161 votes | Poll has closed

FanPosts are user-generated blogs-within-the-blog. We ask that members abide by our community guidelines and keep things respectable. Thanks.

Comment 67 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I voted George

Maybe I’m just drinking the Kool-Aid…but he seems to have the best combination of current skills and athletic upside. I don’t hate Hayward, Henry or Babbitt either, but only George can do this.

by Frank Madden on May 26, 2010 12:18 AM CDT reply actions  

I voted Henry, even though I'm sipping the George Kool-Aid

I have posted a few times with my love of George, but I just had a thought that worries me some about him. We are looking to carry on what we have right now and pick up more wins this season, in the hopes of adding an even bigger piece with our cap space. For that reason, I voted Henry. Here me out on this. The only real knock on Henry right now is his supposed “lack of upside,” as well as the opinion that he isn’t athletically gifted. I completely disagree with this. In my opinion, he is a Paul Pierce clone, only with a better attitude. He can shoot the lights out, has an NBA body, and fits perfectly on a team with a point that can drive and kick and a center that can draw doubles. He has all the strengths of Delfino right now, as a 19 year old college freshman. Imagine what he can be after two years of working with Scott Skiles and Kelvin Sampson. And I say imagine what he can learn, because he’ll get minutes. Let’s not forgot, Jennings was a very, very special case for Scott Skiles. He rarely lets rookies play, and he has been bagged on before by other franchises because of his complete and utter lack of interest in developing young players. The reason Jennings got play? His mixture of talent, maturity, underdog nature, and most importantly, his ability to HANDLE THE BALL. With everything I’ve seen of George, that is one of the biggest holes in his game. And if he turns the ball over early on in a Scott Skiles offense, and doesn’t make up for it on the other end, he will ride the pine the whole season. Henry, on the other hand, seems like his shot is pure enough, and his lack of desire to create his own offense at most times for fear of turning the ball over, would pretty much assure him more minutes in Skiles offense. He’ll simply play it more efficiently.

I love George. I love his upside. However, at the end of the day, Henry seems to have the pedigree, and he still played incredibly as a college freshman on the biggest stage for the number one overall team. Did he collapse a bit? Yes. Is he John Wall, no? But that’s why he’s slipping to number 15 on most boards, and that could really make him a steal. I’d rather take a big talent that is slipping (like Jennings), than reach for a guy that seems to be climbing (Alexander). Go back and look at that Pierce comparison, and tell me that it doesn’t have the potential to be absolutely true.

by BJennings on May 26, 2010 2:19 AM CDT reply actions  

totally agree in your last paragraph
I’d rather take a big talent that is slipping (like Jennings), than reach for a guy that seems to be climbing (Alexander).

That always makes more sense to me.

Go Beer, I mean Bucks

by Take Back Our Bucks on May 26, 2010 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

If Henry slips to us, I'll take him.

If not, George. If he’s gone…. Everything’s out the window….

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 31, 2010 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I voted Babbitt

but I really really like Anderson, he is a big time scorer. He is a good enough athlete to be able to get to the rim, I think he didn’t have to in college. Much like his defense, he wasn’t asked to, and he didn’t.

Coach Scott will make him defend, and make his take it to the rim. Anderson will work for the bucks.

Go Beer, I mean Bucks

by Take Back Our Bucks on May 26, 2010 9:05 AM CDT reply actions  

Babbitt's such an interesting player

I think the tweener stuff always scares me, but his shooting ability is straight up ridiculous. If he can shoot like that even when he’s not a #1 option (which is a problem for many guys), he’s guaranteed to have a very long career.

by Frank Madden on May 26, 2010 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

For me it is George, Henry, and then Babbitt...

The fact that George seems to have the potential to be something special and some current skills is nice…

I still think Henry has some good upside given how highly people thought of him coming out of high school and the fact he is young…

Babbitt has such sweet shooting ability and will be in the league a long time… if we didn’t have a million tweeners I’d be down for him in a heartbeat… I wouldn’t be upset with either of these 3 to be honest with you considering the roster will probably be 50% different by the first game of next season….

by Superelkman on May 26, 2010 9:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Paul George gets my vote

(see Frank Madden’s comments as I echo his thoughts)

by tommyr on May 26, 2010 10:21 AM CDT reply actions  

George

One thing I will say for George though: The Bucks have already met with him twice. If Skiles gets a good feel for him, and agrees with Hammond that he will give him minutes, no matter his struggles, to help his development, then I’m game. I just don’t want his potential to be squandered on the bench. I know Alexander was a huge dud, and yes, he was given opportunities, but he also didn’t get the fairest shake (IMO) to see what he could really do within the Bucks’ system. A trip to the NBDL certainly didn’t help (and from everything I’ve seen, George certainly doesn’t seem like he’ll need anything near that drastic), but I would hope that the Skiles/Hammond connection will ensure that whoever they draft, they will get time this year to develop. I feel like this is vital for Jennings, Bogut, and the rest of the young core going forward. We certainly don’t want to rebuild, but I feel like its worth taking a step back if it means greater development for all of our young guys (after all, we’ve always been playing for the 2011 season anyway).

by BJennings on May 26, 2010 10:38 AM CDT reply actions  

Nice trio indeed

Bogut-Jennings-George. They can get a couple of big guys in the second round cuz there are a ton of them in this draft. Personally, I don’t believe that there is a drastic difference between some second-round big men and first-round big men. Even those who are slated for the lottery have some question marks.

What would rankle me is if George was available and they took Hayward instead. I am confident with Hammonds and Skiles; we know they have a plan.

by tommyr on May 26, 2010 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah I agree with your assessment of the bigs in this draft... while the first few have some high upside after that there are a lot of guys who are just good rebounders and defensive guys which is awesome since the Bucks need that...

I’d love for our draft to look like this:
1st SG/SF Paul George
2nd PF Trevor Booker
2nd C Ryan Richards

George can be our 2-guard of the future, Booker is a rebounding beast and can come in and contribute off the bench immediately in the frontcourt, and Richards gives us a guy to stash in Europe or he D-League to develop and pay dividends down the road… Otherwise I wouldn’t mind Jerome Jordan or Dexter Pittman as our last 2nd as guys that could hopefully play backup C next season for us…

by Superelkman on May 26, 2010 1:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Chad Ford's Mock Draft 3.0 - Bucks taking Henry

With Hayward going before (Clippers) and George right after (T-Wolves). This is the second of his three mocks that Ford has the Bucks picking Henry. I still prefer George because I have read a few scouting reports that Henry is one-dimensional. I don’t want another Michael Redd.

by tommyr on May 26, 2010 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

very interesting stuff

Id be comfortable with either George or Henry at 15………..I love George’s size and fluidity in shooting and movement…..but If Henry drops to 15 he will be hard to pass up think he will be the bargain of the draft if he drops that far he is quality

by ILIKEBJ'S on May 26, 2010 1:40 PM CDT reply actions  

I second that.

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 28, 2010 10:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously

Nothing I’d rather be doing on draft night than nerding it up with you guys :)

by Frank Madden on May 29, 2010 1:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

haha fair enough that

hopefully we hit this year again and our first round pick is actually better than our second round pick…..is that too much to ask

by ILIKEBJ'S on May 29, 2010 3:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

yeah.... we already have a bright future with good players at the most important positions and a really good coach...

if we can hit on another good player to form a big three combo of bogut, jennings, and whoever I think we will really have a shot of making some noise into the future… I think George or Henry can be that type of player going forward…

by Superelkman on May 29, 2010 8:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dark horses

Do you guys see anyone potentially coming out of nowhere (relatively speaking) the way Jennings did a year ago? We’ve talked a little about Kevin Seraphin and Stanley Robinson, but I’m not sure who else could realistically get on the Bucks radar right now.

We also haven’t really talked about someone like Ed Davis or Cole Aldrich slipping out of the lottery, but that’s always a possibility. My concern with guys like that is that if they slip on draft night teams often aren’t prepared—sure they’ve watched them on tape during the season, but they often start planning around picking somebody else, and many times they haven’t been able to work out or interview some of those guys. That kind of happened with the Bucks when both Brook Lopez and Jerryd Bayless slipped a couple years ago.

by Frank Madden on May 29, 2010 9:29 AM CDT reply actions  

I think if you can get either of those guys at 15 you have to take a long hard look at them...

i guess it depends on your evaluation of henry and george but if all 4 guys are sitting there at 15 i think that is a very good problem to have… Aldrich will be a solid starting C in my opinion, could play right away, and eventually form a twin towers thing with Bogut… Davis was at one point compared to Bosh although now they compare him to PJ Brown on DX so I think that speaks to his upside as well… with so many good rebounding bigs who may not be studs but can atleast play a physical role off the bench in this draft sure to be there in the 2nd I would still probably take whoever I felt more comfortable with out of Henry or George though unless one of those guys blew me away… if they don’t work them out though I guess it would be a roll of the dice…

by Superelkman on May 29, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hahaha

I dunno, seeing that really long post and then seeing a simple 2 word answer right below kind of gave me a chuckle…

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 29, 2010 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Seraphin + Ed Davis

are two players I think the Bucks should consider.

They’re both more long term projects than immediate contributors though, Seraphin even more than Davis.

I think Davis’ floor is relatively high as an Amir Johnson/Tyrus Thomas kind of player (above average defender+rebounder, complementary offensively). Seraphin about the same, but I project him as a center first, PF second and I’m not sure if he’s ever going to be a good fit next to Bogut (lack of range).

Aldrich is too similar to Bogut while not as good.

by Joana on May 30, 2010 7:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

not a big seraphin despite his physical tools... too raw....

Davis has much more offensive upside than you give him credit for…

by Superelkman on May 31, 2010 3:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seraphin seems like a guy.........

who would be perfect for a 2nd round fly…..agree he just seems a bit raw for an mid range pick

by ILIKEBJ'S on May 31, 2010 4:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ideally

but he’ll be gone well before the 2nd round.

by Joana on May 31, 2010 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seraphin seems like the perfect guy for a team with two first rounders (like Minny)

Then again, I could just be projecting my own uncertainty about Seraphin’s game onto the teams. They should obviously know a heck of a lot more than fans stateside, though his youth and rawness makes him tougher to project regardless of his background.

I like Davis as well, would love to see him slip on draft night but I’ve been assuming he’ll be gone between 7 and 10.

by Frank Madden on Jun 1, 2010 9:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is the 2nd straight year the T Wolves have had more than 1 pick...

I gotta say, they’re building for the future, but where did they get all these picks from?!

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 1, 2010 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

More than one pick in the first round, I mean.

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 1, 2010 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

They come from...
  1. 4 From Sucking so hard
  2. from the Bobcats from the 2008 #20 pick trade – Alexis Ajinca
  3. from Utah for Kyle Korver

Go Beer, I mean Bucks

by Take Back Our Bucks on Jun 2, 2010 1:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

they need three in the first.........

so Kahn can pick two players to play the same position

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 2, 2010 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why only two players?

Everyone knows spending picks on different positions gets you nowhere.

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 2, 2010 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

What? David Kahn lied to me?!

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 3, 2010 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

What is this madness!

;)

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 3, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know. Flynn, Rubio, Wall.... LOLWUT

All though it’s all kind of funny how the whole thing worked out last year.

Their first PG bailed on them for Europe, so they got another to replace him while he’s gone. Maybe Kahn’s really a genius and we’re all idiots…

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 5, 2010 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

ill reserve judgement till after this next season.....

but it didnt go well this season and alot of it was perplexing

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 6, 2010 6:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

At this point Curry and Jennings have both surpassed Flynn, though anything can happen given how young these guys still are. Aside from the PGs, the Wolves didn’t pass on any big men or wing players who have done anything special, so gambling on Rubio/Flynn hasn’t looked as terrible as it otherwise might have. It sucks for them that they had the 5/6 picks in a year when pretty much all the good players on the board played the same position.

by Frank Madden on Jun 6, 2010 12:11 PM CDT up reply actions  

plenty of time for Flynn.....still early days though

probably had the hardest system to learn as we have discussed the ‘kinda sometimes but not really tri angle’

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 6, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know

I think he has a quite large offensive potential if he develops a good face-up game.

I think he can become a 16-18 points per game contributor in addition to the double digit rebounding numbers and above average defense I think he’ll offer pretty soon. I don’t see him as a primary scoring option at all in the long term. Correct but limited passer (not creative).

You think he has much more upside than this? If so, no reason he shouldn’t be the clear choice for the pick, he probably should be a top-5 pick if he has much more offensive upside than this.

Yeah, Seraphin is very raw and is at least 2 years away from being a contributor.

by Joana on May 31, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

it is hard to really say what his upside is but he was a projected top 5 guy at one point and his stock has fallen since then...

nbadraft.nets take on davis’ offensive game “Has a great feel for playing in the post offensively, with crafty fakes and up and under moves. Appears comfortable operating in close as well as 8-10 feet away from the basket … Can score in a variety of ways and has tremendous footwork for his age … Shows excellent touch in the paint converting lefty hook shots and looks to dunk everything … His offensive game, while still unproven, shows a great deal of upside … His long arms and explosive leaping ability allow him to finish with explosive dunks even when attacking the basket from a few feet out …”

by Superelkman on May 31, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Do you agree with that?

Tremendous footwork and great post game? He missed the lower body to fight for position against college players from what I’ve seen last season and he’s very mechanical on his moves. And he was easy to get off of balance when going up. I’m fairly sure he’s going to develop into a more face-up big in the NBA, there’s where he looked good in UNC as well.

But again, if a player with his high floor + high ceiling in non-scoring contributions also has that much offensive potential, then there’s no reason why he shouldn’t be in discussion with Turner, Favors, Cousins.

I definitely project him to be more limited offensively – a player who will peak at 17 ppg if everything goes well with his development and will never demand a double team.

Anyway, I think teams like Detroit or Indiana will take him.

by Joana on May 31, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Kinda unrelated but involves the 15 pick...

What would you think of trading like Redds expiring, Gadzuric, Sova, #15, and a future protected 1st for Bosh and Turkoglu?

Just throwing it out there because i know turk wants to be traded and netting Bosh next to Bogut would almost be the ideal situation for him. Turk would be a throw in and a little pricey but he plays well under defensive minded coaches.

Lineup:
PG Brandon Jennings
SG Anthony Morrow
SF Hedo Turkoglu
PF Chris Bosh
C Andrew Bogut

LRMAM, Delfino, etc. off the bench

I think Toronto would be esctatic to do that if they were going to lose Bosh for nothing anyways. They would have cap room for next year coming out their butts. Two firsts and a promising young player in Sova. We would get a top 15 player to pair next to Bogut and Jennings for years to come and Turk can facilitate some offense as well…

I think a lineup like that under Skiles would win 55+ games a year w/o a doubt in my mind… Just get Hammond to get a few guys to do the dirty work in the frontcourt and a couple shooters via FA on the cheap…

Thoughts?

by Superelkman on May 29, 2010 1:52 PM CDT reply actions  

Unfortuanetly, Bosh has his demands

And even though these are laughable, (Especially the Lakers one. Ugh.) something tells me that he will stand by it.

Just another big market hungry player who wants to leave destruction in their wake, I guess….

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 29, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Dang it!

This is the link I meant to post:

http://www.raptorshq.com/2010/5/21/1482380/bosh-gives-raptors-wish-list

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 29, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Paul George

I’m only now starting to watch the games ESPNA broacasted and I DVRed so there are prospects I’m not familiar with + some I won’t have the chance to watch. Paul George is one of the cases that falls in the later category, but I really like what I’ve read about him so far.

Avery Bradley is and will be a terrific defender at the PG position (I think he’ll struggle to guard more than a few short 2-guards though). Westbrook/Rondo level. He isn’t and I doubt he’ll ever be a PG though. He’d be amazing playing alongside LeBron James or Tyreke Evans as the 1-guard (having very reduced playmaking duties). He reminds me of Mo Williams with great defense, great intangibles, great motor and no selfishness.

Agreed about Hayward. I like his upside but the Bucks aren’t the right team for him to develop it.

Agreed about Warren, limited player.

by Joana on May 30, 2010 7:18 PM CDT reply actions  

I wish

I would have payed attention more to the players when I watched college ball….. Now, most of these guys I only know about from written descriptions and random YouTube clips…

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 31, 2010 9:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm filling out my job application as we speak.

So that when their new GM tears his ACL somehow, I’ll be next in line….

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 1, 2010 4:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

or he gets thrown under the bus after LBJ signs elsewhere

definitely over qualified for a job with the T’Wolves

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 1, 2010 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Can't wait for part 3.

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on May 30, 2010 9:42 PM CDT reply actions  

Seraphin may pull out of the draft

Injured his knee, we’ll be out at least 4 weeks (no workouts) and it may be more serious than that (waiting for MRI),

by Joana on Jun 1, 2010 10:59 AM CDT reply actions  

If Seraphin doesn't pull out...

He’d fall into the 2nd round for sure, he’d be a nice selection at 47 to let develop in France for a few years and heal that injury while leaving a roster spot open for signing a guy off the summer league roster into the regular season.

by FearTheDeer on Jun 7, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

I really liked another Frenchman, Antoine Diot, a very promising PG, but he got injured and pulled out of the draft. I’ve heard the Bucks scouts liked him as well.

Two 7fters – Tibor Pleiss and Miroslav Raduljica – are also very interesting prospects who will stay in Europe for a couple of seasons and there’s a good chance that at least one of them will be available in the mid second. Pleiss is more underdeveloped, especially physically, but he probably has more potential. Raduljica is probably good enough already to be a situational backup in the NBA, but his ceiling is not as high.

Nemanja Bjelica is a player with a very peculiar skill-set and an extremely high potential but I have serious doubts about his ability to put it together, at least in a way that could make him an effective NBA player, so I’d pass on him.

by Joana on Jun 7, 2010 7:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Euro option would make sense with one of the 2nd rounders

The Bucks have the roster space to keep three rookies but if you’re going to make a longer-term pick then you might as well do it in a year when you have three picks.

by Frank Madden on Jun 7, 2010 9:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Long DX report on Pleiss

http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Finding-a-Niche-for-Tibor-Pleiss-3465

Givony also tweeted that OKC may be considering him as high as #26. As for Raduljica, he apparently blew off a workout at the Eurocamp that didn’t earn him any fans. Givony still think he’ll go somewhere in the 50s.

by Frank Madden on Jun 7, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Apparently he's staying in

Then again, I don’t think there’s a chance he’ll fall that deep. Too much of an athlete.

I also think that he’ll either sign a NBA contract right away or leave France for a stronger league – and that will probably mean he’ll stay in Europe two more seasons.

by Joana on Jun 7, 2010 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Apparently, Seraphin is fine

DraftExpress:

Kevin Seraphin is in Treviso getting measured. Came out 6-9 in shoes, 264, w/7-3 wingspan, 9-1 standing reach. Walking normal, knee is fine.

And DX still has him listed as a top 25 selection so obviously this injury hasn’t affected him too much

"Why are you behaving like such an American?"
--David Stern

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 7, 2010 8:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Another Golden Opportunity Missed
Small
FSN alternate channel for Bucks game Monday
Kksp2_small
A theory on Jennings.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer