Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Chan Sung Jung Wins Thriller Over Dustin Poirier

Free Agent Scenario

I'm sure there will be more coverage about free agency when the season actually ends, but can we begin the speculation now? The internets are abuzz that Bosh has all but left the Raptors. Boozer has been out of Utah about 7 times. Amare almost got traded to about 5 teams at this year's deadline. What I'm getting at is this; there are teams that are going to lose their free agents this year whether they like it or not. What are the ramifications of doing sign and trade deals? I know there are things like bird rights and other rules to get around, but for teams that know their star player is on the way out, wouldn't they look to do a sign and trade to get something out of it? For instance:

Raptors get:
Michael Redd's huge expiring contract
Bucks first rounder

Bucks get:
Bosh under some ridiculous max contract

This, in theory makes sense because if Toronto can't sign Bosh, they'd want to get something out of the deal, and could take a risk on Redd in exchange for a first round pick. You could change the scenario to Boozer, Nowitski, or heck, D-Wade.

I feel like I have to be missing something, because it all seems so easy. Granted, a lot of teams wouldn't want that $18 million contract, but to take a risk on what was a 20PPG scorer and a 1st rounder when your alternative is to lose your best player with nothing in return.....it makes sense.

FanPosts are user-generated blogs-within-the-blog. We ask that members abide by our community guidelines and keep things respectable. Thanks.

Comment 26 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Or

They could just not sign Bosh, and achieve the same thing, while paying less money over all.

by MagicMark on May 6, 2010 11:47 PM CDT reply actions  

Raps will prefer to deal with a team with cap space

The big issue with a S&T is that the Bucks have to send out a ton of salary to bring Bosh in (you’re obviously accounting for that with Redd), while teams with cap space don’t have to match salaries. They can structure something where they send out much less salary (like a young player on a rookie contract, draft picks, etc—no deadweight salary.), which is probably much more preferable to the Raps, who could also get a huge trade exception if they do a lopsided deal.

The main wrinkle with a Bucks deal is that Redd’s contract will be 80% covered by insurance as long as he’s out, so if they can keep him from playing it’s a good thing. And it also means the cost of doing business with the Bucks in a trade is much less. But I’m sure the Raps would prefer a big trade exception to one year of Redd’s ugly salary (even if it’s mostly insured).

I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Bosh ends up in a S&T, but I imagine it will be a case where he says he’s interested in signing with a team that has max cap space, but then won’t sign until they first try to do a S&T—in order to get the bigger annual raises and sixth year that only the Raps can offer (b/c of Bird rights). So for instance he might tell the Nets he’s interested but wants a six year deal and they need to talk to Toronto. The Raps could then try to force Jersey to give up some assets in order for them to facilitate getting Bosh more money. It’s kind of messed up when you think about it, since Bosh would be getting a monster contract even without the Raps being involved and instead he makes New Jersey give up players/picks who would otherwise help Bosh win games down the road. I doubt Toronto could get that much out of the deal since he’s likely gone anyway, but if Bosh has multiple teams competing to give him max deals you could see a team bend over backwards in a S&T. Who knows.

by Frank Madden on May 7, 2010 11:53 AM CDT reply actions  

More thoughts

Just thinking about it, much of it comes down to the Raptors’ bargaining power. If Bosh really wants to sign for the Bucks (let’s just play hypotheticals), then it shifts bargaining power to Toronto since the Bucks can’t do it without them. In which case they want a lot.

But if Toronto thinks Bosh is leaving no matter what they do, then obviously they’d settle for anything—any pick and trade exception makes them happy if Bosh ends up signing with a cap space team either way. For instance, the Sonics got an exception and a conditional second rounder from Orlando in the Rashard Lewis S&T…basically nothing, but that was largely because Lewis was ready to sign for Orlando without them getting involved. In that case, Toronto might prefer a deal with the Bucks even if it involves Redd—but we’d have to offer something more appealing than just Redd’s salary to match. Throw in a first and/or Ilyasova…well then you probably get Colangelo’s attention. And if Colangelo wants to deal then all of a sudden you can give Bosh a max deal.

All that said, it’s still really tough because we just don’t have the flexibility of the teams with cap space. But by the same token the fact that so many teams do have cap space also means that Toronto is probably feeling increasingly resigned to the fact that Bosh is going to leave and they need to cut their losses.

by Frank Madden on May 7, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you're right about Toronto's feelings towards the Bosh situation....

And that bodes well for us in the event that we pursue something like this. The power really all rests on Bosh, who is one of the 5 or so free agents can choose where he wants to go. I personally think we have a very attractive team for a PF right now, which is in my opinion our biggest hole pending Ilyasova’s development. But after a playoff run, and the two ends of the floor covered in Jennings and Bogut, we’re one big man away from something huge here in Milwaukee. Couple that with the fact that Bosh is used to the cold weather, and we might have a convincing case.

It seems like you concur that from the Raptors point of view something is better than nothing. A 15th pick, and a one year risk on a recovering perennial scorer seems like a great opportunity for Toronto. Redd would be a great fit for the defenseless Raptors:)

by everyoneruns on May 7, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think Bosh is a good candidate to sign along with another big name FA—for instance Miami could sign him and Wade, even if the rest of their core will be garbage. Or maybe the Knicks lure someone like JJ alongside him. I’d be curious to know if Bosh wants to be THE guy or if he’d prefer to be a superstar’s rather excellent wingman. I’m actually a huge fan of Bosh, but I can’t see him winning a title unless he’s got a superstar or a ridiculously balanced supporting cast around him.

I think in a general sense Milwaukee makes a bunch of sense for the reasons mentioned. But I think it’s a longshot at best, mainly because…well, a lot would need to go right.

by Frank Madden on May 7, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

If I’m understanding this correctly, what you’re saying Frank is that in the case of a Sign and Trade deal we’d have to match dollar for dollar whatever we’d be signing Bosh for. And teams with more cap space would not? So in the case of the Nets, they could do a S&T with Toronto that is Bosh for their number one pick, and that would work?

If so, that hurts our cause greatly. Not that the Nets would ever dump the #1 pick for the right to sign Bosh, but as appealing as a #15 pick would be, the added baggage of Redd’s contract would probably be a dealbreaker. Then again, the Raptors are absolutely going to lose Bosh, and let’s face it, they don’t have the pieces to attract another top free agent. It wouldn’t hurt to turn a bad situation into a draft pick in Toronto’s eyes, and we could turn Michael Redd and a draft pick into Chris Bosh. Someone please forward this to Hammond :)

by everyoneruns on May 7, 2010 12:13 PM CDT reply actions  

I think it's a really interesting possibility

As far as the mechanics, the key thing is how the trade rules impact teams over and under the cap differently. If I’m under the cap, I can take back salary without sending any out (like NJ in your example). The Bucks and any other team over the cap can only acquire 125% of the salaries they send out + $100k. The logic is obviously that the NBA doesn’t want teams circumventing the salary cap by using trades to add unlimited amounts of salary.

I think we have generally ignored the possibility of these kinds of scenarios because a) we assume only teams with cap space can sign max contract players and b) we assume no one wants to come to Milwaukee anyway. But I think the latter is definitely changing; nobody said that kind of thing about Detroit when they were winning 50 games every year, and I think it becomes less of an issue going forward. And a) also doesn’t have to be true, especially if you have assets to make the trade portion work. Among teams over the cap, Dallas is probably the best situated to make a S&T move since Dampier’s huge 10/11 salary is NG’ed (at least I think that’s my understanding). Being able to cut a guy with a completely non-guaranteed $13 million salary is as good as having that cap space in most ways.

I think the subtle irony of all this is that teams like the Mavs actually have a better chance of doing a S&T because of all the teams with cap space. Think about it—if the only way for Bosh to get max dollars is by staying in Toronto, then the Raptors can just make outrageous demands of any team interested in a S&T. It’s not like Bosh is going to take the MLE from somebody.

But the fact that Bosh can easily sign a max deal with a bunch of teams and leave the Raptors with zero compensation basically makes them desperate. Which in turn makes it much more feasible for a team w/o cap space to make a modest offer that the Raps would be willing to work with. You still need Bosh on board, but at the very least you can’t say that cap space is what did you in. I think it’s totally reasonable for Hammond to give Bosh’s agent a call and let them know they’re interested in making something work.

by Frank Madden on May 7, 2010 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

You said you know Paschke...

He might be our closest ally to Hammond. Make that call :)

You implied that the Bucks are over the cap. Are we really? With only 8 players (not counting Salmons), I can’t imagine us being over the cap, even if it’s smaller for next season.

And how on earth can we figure out what Damp’s contract is? I remember last season us hoping to trade Damp for Redd. You’re right that Dallas has the better shot if that contract is NG’ed, but Bosh to Dallas seems like either Dirk or Bosh would have to play center, that is unless Dirk walks.

by everyoneruns on May 7, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

one interesting thing is where Bosch see's himself in the spectrum of things.......

does he see himself as the number 1 guy or as the side kick robin to say Wade’s Batman? It’s kinda an ego thing as well I guess………If he goes to the Net’s that’s as the main guy right? Do they have enough for two max guys? Im not sure that is appealing to him again…if it;s not only a financial thing which it cant totally be otherwise he could just stay in Toronto……….Im not sure he is really interested in helping Toronto out much either?….that relationship seems to be going down hill fast

in pure basketball terms and potential you look at Bogut & Jenning’s and say yup great fit Bogut does the heavy banging and alot of the hard work, a great young point guard, good coach………

but the bright lights and championship lights shine brighter elsewhere…….Miami makes alot of sense, Houston seems like they are going to be players because they have alot of pieces since they moved T-Mac, cant count out Cuban with Dampier’s contract as the bargaining chip, but like you said Nowitzki & Bosch doesnt seem to quite mesh but has that ever stopped Cuban………….funny all this tinkering he has done if he just kept Nash & Nowiztki together who knows what they could have done

by ILIKEBJ'S on May 7, 2010 9:00 PM CDT reply actions  

it’s totally out of Colangelos hands by now

by the_craze on May 8, 2010 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Right

But if Bosh wants to go to a team like Dallas that doesn’t have cap space, he’ll need Colangelo to facilitate a S&T for at least a small fee.

by Frank Madden on May 8, 2010 10:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Bottom line is he's not comin' to Milwaukee

and Dallas has the Dampier expiring contract they can trade.

by the_craze on May 9, 2010 7:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

This trade is ridiculous

Why would the raptors trade arguably the best Power Forward in basketball for a draft pick?not even a lottery pick? If they trade Bosh it’s for another big name superstar or 3or 4 high draft picks.

by philthebballplayer on May 8, 2010 5:05 PM CDT reply actions  

Bosh is a free agent

Your logic makes sense if they had Bosh under contract, but they don’t. And at this point the most likely scenario is that he leaves for a team with cap space and they get nothing. If that’s the case then the Raptors should be happy to get anything. I don’t expect the Bucks to make a serious play for Bosh, but in general it’s very possible the Raptors end up facilitating a S&T so Bosh can get more money and they get at least a trade exception.

by Frank Madden on May 8, 2010 10:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Raptors don't have cap room

They can only re-sign Bosh because they have Bird rights on him…factoring in their first round cap hold and enough cap holds to get to the min number of roster spots, they essentially will only have the MLE to spend on outside free agents. That will be the case even if they S&T’ed Bosh and got a big contract (like Redd) coming back the other way.

You’d quite possibly have to throw in Ilyasova to get the Raptors to take Redd’s contract (even though it’s 80% insured until he comes back), but the point is that the Raptors could get completely screwed.

by Frank Madden on May 8, 2010 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I sent this thread to the Bucks Twitter feed....

I’m sure Hammond has read it by now, as we all know he runs the Bucks Twitter account.

The overall tone of this thread, outside of completely blind optimism by Frank and myself is that there is no way Bosh comes here. And if that’s the case, well I obviously wouldn’t be surprised, but let’s deviate from the Bucks then, and discuss where Bosh might prefer to go. Here’s a quick list.

Amount under the salary cap according to NBA.com (older data captured right after trade deadline. Cap assumed at $53.6 mil):

New York $32,028,263
New Jersey $26,429,341
Miami $21,345,674
Washington $18,943,379
Chicago $17,937,884
Sacramento $17,145,870
L.A. Clippers $15,364,727
Minnesota $12,595,844
Oklahoma City $11,495,849

The Bucks aren’t much further down on this list, with Frank estimating the Bucks are about $10.2 million under the cap. Without accounting for which team lands Lebron, Wade, or JJ, I’d say that the Bucks have to be in the top 5 list of preferred cap-friendly destinations.

OK City is on the brink, and I would imagine Bosh would send them right to the forefront. I’d put them at the top of the list, although I’m not sure what tradable assets they have.

Chicago has quality young pieces in Rose and Noah, and is the right up there as a top NBA city thanks to the Jordan era. Their current lack of a coach hurts their cause, however.

Miami is a destination, so even without a shell of a team, ballplayers want to play there.

New York is the “mecca” of basketball, although for being such a touted destination by the media, the team has been a joke for quite a while. However, there is the Mike D’Antoni affect that could bring superstars back to MSG.

I think Milwaukee is somewhere on this list of five. Same as Chicago in that we have Bogut and Jennings, and we have the edge in coaching with Skiles. No Jordan era to back us up, however.

This list is most definitely incomplete because I’m only really looking at the top cap-friendly teams. There are the Dallas’ of the world that have a $13 million dollar non guaranteed contract (Dampier), and a solid SF in Caron Butler that has a contract expiring in 2011. Even with all that said, I think we have a shot at it, albeit a small one. John Hammond needs to spend some of the team’s Playoff revenue on beefing up (or creating) the free agent recruitment department.

by everyoneruns on May 9, 2010 9:39 AM CDT reply actions  

Bucks are $10.2 mil below tax, not cap

So we’re really not “cap friendly,” though I don’t think you have to have cap space per se to make a run at a big name free agent.

by Frank Madden on May 9, 2010 11:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

I like the cheap and friendly option at least for this year

can get a real idea of where we are at as well……..Redd and Gadz contracts are there to utilise have some draft picks to use to add some cheap talent rotation guys……….Hammonds works the phones for some more value deals

by ILIKEBJ'S on May 9, 2010 11:49 AM CDT reply actions  

Let's add a dimension to this potential deal

I was thinking about the plausibility of this deal actually going down, and I put myself in the Raptors shoes. What if the Raptors countered with this offer:

Bosh S&T/Turkoglu

for

Redd/#15 pick/Gadzuric/Bell

Turkoglu’s production was anything but what Toronto was hoping for (11/4/4 on the year) based on his ginormous contract. Best case scenario for Toronto would be to drop him, and it might actually benefit Hedo for a fresh start. Gadzuric would be another expiring for Toronto, so the complete rebuilding process would start sooner rather than later. Bell would be the Thank you from Toronto for taking Hedo’s awful contract.

In an effort to be as realistic as possible, I think this scenario is much more likely. I’m not at all keen on the huge Hedo contract, but if he could get re-focused on the game and get back to his Orlando form, we’d have a clutch shooter for close games. Our starting lineup would like as such:

Jennings
?
Turkoglu
Bosh
Bogut

Plug in any serviceable shooting guard, and we suddenly have a killer starting lineup. This would probably kill our future salary outlook, as our 3, 4, and 5 starting spots will be earning 9-17 million each. Another pipe dream, and this one would benefit the Bucks much less, but something probably more realistic. Would the Bucks pull this trigger?

by everyoneruns on May 18, 2010 9:02 AM CDT reply actions  

No

After all their hard work the last two seasons, I don’t think Hammond and his team would throw it all away with taking on another terrible contract in Turkoglu. He wasn’t voted Executive of the Year for making these types of trades. Turk is waaaay past his best and there is too much risk that he won’t get back to anywhere near that again. Remember, up until about 07/08 he was considered a ho-hum average player and only had his breakout best form for 2 seasons.

by Big Crazy Dave on May 19, 2010 1:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see any of this happening... it isn't Hammonds M.O.

He will draft a couple guys, make a couple small to medium sized signing… maybe make a small trade or two and stay the cap-friendly course…

by Superelkman on May 22, 2010 10:48 AM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Another Golden Opportunity Missed
Small
FSN alternate channel for Bucks game Monday
Kksp2_small
A theory on Jennings.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer