Bucks select Darington Hobson, Jerome Jordan and Tiny Gallon in second round
John Hammond suggested yesterday that it was "probably not feasible" for the Bucks to bring four rookies into training camp, but 47 picks into the draft the Bucks have four new players who project to be in the NBA come November.
And they're big. Real big. After selecting the Larry Sanders and his 7'6" wingspan 15th overall, the Bucks went with versatile small forward Darington Hobson at 37, Tulsa's talented center Jerome Jordan at 44, and Oklahoma's ironically-named Tiny Gallon at 47. The Bucks have yet to announce any trades, though it's still possible they could deal one of their picks (likely one of the bigs) before the night is out [UPDATE: Alan Hahn tweets that Jordan is being sent to the Knicks for cash].
Suggesting that you can never have enough small forwards, the Bucks opted to go with New Mexico's versatile Hobson with the first of their three second round picks, 37th overall. Hobson often operated as a point forward at New Mexico, where he played one season following two years of junior college ball. Perhaps a bit of 3/4 tweener, the 6'7" Hobson led New Mexico in scoring (15.9 ppg), rebounding (9.3 rpg) and assists (4.6 apg), the first player in the program's history to accomplish the feat. He'll turn 23 in September and scouts question whether he's athletic enough to keep up with NBA small forwards, but he's a savvy guy who the Bucks saw up close on June 16 when he worked out against first round picks Luke Babbitt, Gordon Hayward, and Lazar Hayward.
The 6'10", 300 pound Gallon was talked about this morning as likely going to New Jersey at #31, but he also had been heavily linked with the Bucks in recent weeks. A former teammate of Brandon Jennings at Oak Hill, Gallon worked out for the Bucks on June 2 against Gani Lawal and wasn't bashful about his interest in the Bucks. A former McDonald's All-American, Gallon was something of a disappointment for the collective trainwreck known as the Oklahoma basketball program, and left the program after just one year amid reports that his mother accepted $3,000 from an agent. Conditioning has not surprisingly always been an issue for Gallon, and he played just 24.0 mpg at OU, averaging a ho-hum 10.3 ppg and a more-impressive 7.9 rpg, which ranked him among the NCAA's top 20 in rebounds per minute. He's also known for having a nice outside touch, but made just 4/17 from three point range. He's frequently been compared to Glen Davis (another lovably nicknamed fat guy!), but Tiny is also a fair bit longer (7'4" wingspan) and probably ends up a better rebounder. That's not to say he's going to be a more useful pro than Davis, since Tiny probably doesn't have the same bizarre agility as Big Baby either. DraftExpress projects him as a PF in the NBA, but I wonder if his lack of footspeed means he ends up getting more time at center. For much more on Tiny, check out dishingoutdime's excellent scouting report in the FanPosts.
Jordan didn't work out with the Bucks but has been on NBA teams' radar for a few years and stuck around for four years in Tulsa despite getting draft buzz since his sophomore year. The first thing that stands out about Jordan? He's enormous: nearly 7'1" in shoes to go with a 7'5" wingspan and 244 pounds. At Tulsa he was a solid scorer (15.4 ppg), rebounder (9.1 rpg) and shot-blocker (2.3 bpg), but his overall efficiency stats were fairly flat across his last three season and he turns 24 in September, which helps explain how he managed to slide all the way into the late second round. Given he wasn't really linked with the Bucks, he might be the most likely guy to be moved among the three big men.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I
live in Mountain West Conference territory so I watched Hobson quite a bit. This kid is dynamic and Lobos players usually pan out well in the Association. Anyone ever heard of Danny Granger? He won’t be as good as Granger, but Hobson will still be excellent.
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Jun 24, 2010 10:11 PM CDT reply actions
I did my FanPost Scouting Report on Tiny
I have to admit, I was a lot kinder than I thought I’d be.
"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne
by dishingoutdimes on Jun 24, 2010 11:06 PM CDT reply actions
I think Gallon is exactly the kinda guy you pick in the 2nd round
hmm Hobson sounds intriguing ……….though when I read he worked out against Hayward & Babbit no wonder he looked good ;) sorry I couldnt help but take one last swing for old times sake…….
Gallon's weight and conditioning will be the biggest factor on whether he makes the team
Just glad he is a 2nd rounder without quaranteed money and not in the 1st like Traylor.
by Brick's house on Jun 25, 2010 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions
yup thats exactly the point....
the guy has talent so get him in……the rest is up to him if he wants to make it
I have to say
It’s looking better for us to resign Ridnour or Salmons or both. Hammond would have taken a guard if he knew those guys were both leaving, plus trading Bell, right?
"But we all know that games aren't played on paper...they are played by little men inside our TV sets." --Kenny Mayne
by dishingoutdimes on Jun 24, 2010 11:24 PM CDT reply actions
agreed......Hammonds has shown alot of love for Salmons and Ridnour
I feel the Bucks have treated Salmons amazingly well and shown a lot of dedication towards a guy who played half a season, when you look at how a lot of teams, Atlanta is the king, treat their FA’s its a classy move, rather than dare them to set the market the Bucks put up what I feel is a great deal and said we really want you back, even after acquiring Maggette and CDR they could have covered themselves somewhat and taken a SG/PG combo but nope they didnt ……..
so tell me your Salmons and Ridnour, and you dont want to be back?
I agree
With the Ridnour part, but do you think the Bucks should/would offer more than 27m/4yrs for Salmons? I know we need a 2 but not sure if I would offer more than that.
I think now that we have Maggette and CDR...thats the best we offer Salmons
take it or leave it I doubt he gets a better 4 yr deal than that anywhere
It will be fun to watch these picks in summer league
I am looking forward to watching Hobson play point forward and seeing the rail thin Sanders and wide load Gallon play side by side in the paint.
Selling Jerome Jordan?
I’m not sure I like it, but I understand it.
Roster Today
PG: Jennings
SG: Redd
SF: Delfino, Maggette, CDR, Hobson
PF: Ilyasova, LRMAM, Sanders, Gallon, Jackson
C: Bogut, Jordan
13 guys
by FearTheDeer on Jun 25, 2010 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions
Free Agency
Assuming they sell Jordan as rumor has it, which I don’t like them doing until they know if they can re-sign KT.
IMO it’d be ideal to get:
Salmons, Ridnour, KT, Gooden (release Jackson)
by FearTheDeer on Jun 25, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions
PG: Jennings, Hobson
SG. Redd, Delfino, Magette, Hobson
SF: Maggette, CDR, Ilyasova, Mbah a Moute, Sanders, Hobson
PF: Mbah a Moute, Illy, Sanders, Gallon, Jackson
C: Bogut, Jordan, Gallon, Jackson
Scott Skiles is like a practical Don Nelson. He is going to run some lineups that will wow you.
by MadTown Hoops on Jun 25, 2010 1:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Darnell Jackson
Two questions. Is his deal guaranteed for next year and if he would be behind both Sanders and Gallon, why would they keep him?
I've had it with this verkakte flippity-ship!
No Ily at 3..
Hobson will probably be a SG. He’s just rail thin, that won’t hold up well at SF.
No Gallon or Jackson at C. Jordan is no longer a Buck. If anything Sanders will back-up Bogut at C.
by FearTheDeer on Jun 25, 2010 11:52 AM CDT up reply actions
I'm working on a theory
That the Knicks needed Jerome Jordan to bridge some sort of strange gap between the failed acquisitions of Jerome James and Jordan Hill.
by ZV on Jun 25, 2010 1:34 AM CDT up reply actions
LOL ;)
Squad Six is to the Bucks what beer is to Milwaukee (or anywhere else for that matter)... the catalyst for you doing dumb things in public and not feeling self-conscious!
by Big Crazy Dave on Jun 25, 2010 2:32 AM CDT up reply actions
I think that signals we are in the market for guys like........
Gooden, Amir Johnson, Ian Mahinmi? any other big guy FA’s?
we definitely need a experienced back up for Bogut even if hopefully we manage to get KT back…..
Amir, Mahnmi, or Gooden would be good by me... get one of those guys and Anthony Morrow and were set...
by Superelkman on Jun 25, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions
PG: Jennings
SG. Morrow
SF: Ilyasova
PF: Gooden
C: Bogut
-this would be a really good rebounding lineup and you’d have two guys that can hit 3’s in Sova and Morrow
2nd String:
PG: Ridnour
SG: Maggette
SF: LRMAM
PF: Sanders
C: ? ? ? ?
by Superelkman on Jun 25, 2010 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions
No way Ilyasova can play 3
How will he guard Lebron? Iggy, Durant, Pierce, Granger, Gay?
If you can’t defend it, you can’t play it.
by FearTheDeer on Jun 25, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions
ha you arent very smart are you
luke carried this team last year….if he played as many mins and shot as much as brandon jennings did…he would have had better number…count on that
Wow. This could get really interesting.
"He definitely is a combo guy," said Hammond. "When people say a 6′6 guy can play point guard, most of the time you kind of roll your eyes and say, ‘yeah right’. But I think he can play a little point, because he has good enough feet defensively. The old theory is you can’t play it unless you can guard it. And I think that he might be able to guard the position."
This team is a piece away from being a contender in one year.
hmm serious.....sounds intrigiung
I was hoping we go after Torrance because he gives us big body at the PG…….but maybe thats why they went with Hobson…..certainly got my interest
a big piece...
star power still ultimately wins it in the nba… we can be a really solid team for years but if we are a true contender depends on whether BJ can achieve elite status or if we can get another star player and try to Detroit Pistons our way(with a ton of good not great talent) to a championship… still the way that most teams win it all is with a top 5 player complemented by a top 25 player l and well-balanced team around them…
by Superelkman on Jun 25, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions
I am excited about Bucks basketball this year though... I think we have a team capable of getting to the 2nd round and once your there who knows what could happen...
The front office of this organization is really good…

by 















