Scott Skiles And Bucks Vow To Pick Up The Pace
The Bucks played far better in faster-paced games last season, despite being the sixth-slowest team in the NBA judging by pace factor. I wrote about this phenomenon extensively throughout last season when I started making the connection, because the numbers were so striking: In Milwaukee's 41 fastest-paced games, they went 23-18. In their slowest 41 games, they went 12-29.
Last year's Bucks were the slowest-paced team Scott Skiles has ever coached, and their inability to push the ball plagued them badly in transition, where they finished last in the NBA averaging 10.0 fastbreak points per game. On Media Day, I asked Skiles if becoming a more up-tempo team is a point of emphasis this upcoming season.
Skiles: "There has never been a moment where I have been a coach anywhere where that has not been a point of emphasis. We are looking to peel that thing off the board, push the ball up quickly, if a good shot presents itself early in the clock, we want to take it. But we want to make it. If you make your share of those, it's incredible what happens."
Hopefully this time Milwaukee will practice what they preach, because the team's many defensive stops can and should be converted to offense quickly and efficiently, if the Bucks are to take major steps forward.
While full of flaws, the dearly departed Keyon Dooling (led team shooting 65.3 % at rim), Corey Maggette (best And1 % on team), and Chris Douglas-Roberts (shot better than Brandon Jennings in transition) were not necessarily the chief culprits here.
So, what might prepare Milwaukee to thrive in transition? Well, we have heard a lot about how a number of the newcomers -- Stephen Jackson, Beno Udrih, Shaun Livingston, Tobias Harris, Mike Dunleavy, etc. -- are capable ballhandlers and passers for their size and positions. Logically, that should position the team well on the hypothetical fastbreak -- provided someone is there to finish.
With visions of Brandon Jennings and Luke Ridnour gloriously sharing the backcourt in 2009-10, I asked Skiles if he plans to pair Jennings together with Udrih.
Skiles: "That could happen. We had a pretty good year with Luke and Brandon playing together. And Beno is a bigger player than Luke even. And Shaun has tremendous length and size. One thing that Brandon has proven he is good at - not just one, but - in that type of lineup, is if he doesn't have the ball in his hand, Brandon's best shot is his spot-up three. It's not his dribble-three, or step-back three, some of those shots that he takes that frankly probably aren't as good of shots. But you have to have somebody then who has the ball in their hands able to get the ball to Brandon. So both of the guys for sure are penetrating type players that will kick the ball out. So in theory, yes, any of those guys can play with Brandon."
Jennings shot 36.9 % on on spot-up threes, much better than his 32.3 % mark overall from long range, according to Synergy Sports. But he also only shot 29.6 % on 100 three-pointers in transition, so he would be wise to cut down on those attempts, which are usually off the dribble and always feel wonderful when they splash in but in reality rarely do.
Stephen Jackson excelled on the famously up-tempo Golden State Warriors, who finished first in pace three of the four seasons he played there, and second the other year.
Skiles: "Jax and Mike are both more threes than twos, but they both have enough versatility, the way we structure things anyway, that they kind of are interchangeable and it doesn't really matter. Both can shoot and score, both guys can put the ball on the floor. Shaun, Beno, we have a lot of versatility there. The question will be how it all fits together."
Mike Dunleavy's best season as a pro was when the Pacers ranked third in pace in 2007-08. And after just two days in town with his new team, Dunleavy was already looking forward to playing an up-tempo style.
Dunleavy: "We can push the ball, play a lot of offense."
Drew Gooden also echoed the speed theme, quickly answering a question about how the team can improve offensively by saying the team plans to run more this season.
Gooden: "Our achilles heel was we didn't capitalize on turnovers. Turnovers lead to easy transition baskets, and I think we didn't take advantage of the turnovers that we forced. So I think that is something we are going to emphasize this year, is getting out on the break, and trying to get 4-6 points on layups, that could win a lot of games for us."
That transition basketball was on the tip of so many tongues was heartening to hear. Milwaukee lost 10 games by four points or fewer and 16 games by six points or fewer last season. They also averaged 10.0 fastbreak points per game last season. Averaging 14.0 fastbreak points per game would have tied them for 12th in the NBA, which theoretically could have provided 10 or 11 more wins. What would 11 additional wins have accomplished? A 46-36 record -- same as 2009-10. Obviously, it's not that simplistic of a situation... but it is simple to see that it is past time to pick up the pace.
Follow @brewhoop on Twitter | Like Brew Hoop on Facebook | Join and Start Posting Content
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is my dream
A Bucks team that plays up-tempo but maintains a top-10 defensive efficiency. Intuitively, it seems like a faster pace would be detrimental to playing defense due to drop-offs in defensive rebounding or pulling defenders like Bogut out of the paint when he’s constantly running back and forth. But a healthy balance between pushing the ball when you can and focusing on those key parts of defense when you have to seems like the ideal scenario. The Bucks don’t have to become the Timberwolves (please, please don’t become the TImberwolves), but they should definitely be looking for quick-hitting opportunities more often.
I'm guessing Bogut wuoldn't even make it past half court all the time if Skiles had his way
Rebound, outlet, wings get the easy bucket, no need to move from the defensive end :)
by Frank Madden on Dec 14, 2011 1:01 PM CST up reply actions
As someone who enjoys active basketball...
…your article raises my spirits.
One more piece of evidence that nobody, Skiles included, the players certainly included, liked what last season became.
This training camp seems to have a strong resolve to change things. Even if the results are limited by “reality,” that’s encouraging.
I'm guessing we won't quite get to the level
Of Paul Westhead’s Nuggets teams of the early 90s. (119.9ppg)
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
The Bucks don't have to increase their pace to score 120 ppg...
They just need to make around 60% of their shots.
by Frank Madden on Dec 14, 2011 1:11 PM CST up reply actions
1. Wonder if they figure that Jennings has a greater knack for fast break assists than he does for half court ones.
2. I’d thought I’d heard a TV promo that Fox was showing at least one of the exhibition games. But the Bucks website doesn’t show that, so I guess not. Exhibitions aren’t much, but I’m curious about the new players.
I just zoomed ahead on my digital tv guide to Saturday night, and there was the Bucks game on FSN-WI
So no need to worry chuk, it’ll be on your tv this weekend.
SB Nation Brew Hoop - Editor | SB Nation Midwest News Desk Contributor | SB Nation Chicago - Writer | Twitter: @stevevonhorn
by Steve von Horn on Dec 14, 2011 5:01 PM CST up reply actions
It's always nice...
1. When a “mature” gentleman’s memory works
2. To contemplate 1 or more of you BH heavy hitters going to tonight’s open scrimmage — and then sharing your insights with us here — I’d like to know if my hopes for Livingston adding to our team smarts are built on his rare abilities or on my rare imagination
The Bucks twitter feed said both exhibition games will be on FSN
I was shocked.
I never use a big word when a diminutive word would suffice.
Yeah, been watching it.
It’s really noticable that all players look in REALLY good shape.
Fear the 'Dear'? You're damn right I'm scared of my wife!
by Big Crazy Dave on Dec 14, 2011 7:04 PM CST up reply actions
Livingston looks very smooth in his movements. Silky even....
Fear the 'Dear'? You're damn right I'm scared of my wife!
by Big Crazy Dave on Dec 14, 2011 7:13 PM CST up reply actions
Just started watching, really empty in the arena, sad since it is free to get in.
by Brick's house on Dec 14, 2011 7:34 PM CST up reply actions
on the other forum
“Hobson looks good. I know nothing about him, but he seems to move ok, passes well.”
Been watching him on defense, he looks lost.
When he is on the weak side, he just kind of skitters around looking panicked, not sure where to go.
by Brick's house on Dec 14, 2011 7:56 PM CST up reply actions
you are right about him throwing some sharp passes into the interior, though.
by Brick's house on Dec 14, 2011 7:57 PM CST up reply actions
half court contest so drawn out
that I’m setting the record straight. wasn’t my quote. somebody else on that forum.
whoever "designed" this contest
should be demoted to the D League
And in other news....Paul finally to the Clips for Kaman, Gordon, Aminu + 1st Rounder.
Fear the 'Dear'? You're damn right I'm scared of my wife!
Why do I think
That the Clips got soaked
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Great haul for Hornets all things considered
Strongly prefer that deal to what Lakers were offering…Stern’s gamble paid off.
by Frank Madden on Dec 14, 2011 11:51 PM CST up reply actions
Sure did. Younger (and cheaper) pieces with that Wolves pick around as well sure as heck beats old expensive guys and no worthwhile picks.
I don’t understand people who liked the first trade better…no ownership group is myopic or outright dumb enough to think a few high-paid old guys leading the Hornets to 40-44 wins (and leading the team away from a valuable draft pick) would have increased the long-term value of the franchise.
Stern got the best deal, but no way we see as many columns about that as we did about the “eternal and fundamental change in the very fabric of the NBA” argument that oddly emerged from the veto process. Turns out Stern just knows how to negotiate really well…ask Billy Hunter.
SB Nation Brew Hoop - Editor | SB Nation Midwest News Desk Contributor | SB Nation Chicago - Writer | Twitter: @stevevonhorn
by Steve von Horn on Dec 15, 2011 12:08 AM CST up reply actions
This is EXACTLY what needs to happen
With a dynamic athlete running the point (Jennings) and enough runners alongside him, there’s no reason that we shouldn’t see a steal, block, or defensive rebound turn into a quick outlet and a 3-on-2 or 2-on-1 opportunity more often. If we see this happen at least 6-8 times a game, it will go a long way to improving the team’s point totals. After all, we can’t rely on half-court sets as much, so get the points wherever you can.
And Frank is right; Bogut shouldn’t ever have to pass half-court. Get the ball, pass it to a teammate, and by the time he gets to the center circle, a quality shot should have gone up.
http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.
by Mitchell Maurer on Dec 14, 2011 7:20 PM CST reply actions


















