Caponomics: Mike Dunleavy Arrives, Keyon Dooling Departs
On a day dominated by the Chris Paul controversy and the Knicks' curious Tyson Chandler signing, the Bucks quietly took two major steps towards completing their 11/12 roster by adding former Indiana swingman Mike Dunleavy while offloading surplus point guard Keyon Dooling and a conditional second round pick to Boston. So what does it all mean for the Bucks' roster and cap situation?
As we detailed yesterday, one of the key questions facing the Bucks has been how they could create enough roster spots to accommodate all the players they seem interested in retaining. While there have been strong indications that the Bucks would like to re-sign Luc Mbah a Moute and keep former second round picks Darington Hobson and Jon Leuer, Milwaukee also remains in need of a backup center and was short on wing shooters just a day before camp and free agency were set to open on Friday. Dunleavy fills the latter hole and figures to challenge Carlos Delfino for the starting small forward position, and all at a rather reasonable, low-risk price of $7.5 million over two years. He also provides cover in the event that Luc Mbah a Moute signs an offer sheet outside of the Bucks' comfort zone. I won't go so far as to say the Dunleavy move precludes Luc's return, but it certainly doesn't help.
Meanwhile, the Dooling deal eases the Bucks' logjam at point guard while allowing Milwaukee to shed Dooling's modest-but-unwanted salary of $2.25 million. Viewed together, the Dunleavy and Dooling deals basically saw the Bucks turn their least desirable point guard into a useful, high IQ perimeter threat, all for the price of a conditional second rounder (will see what that ends up meaning), around $1.5 million in additional 11/12 salary and around $3.75 million next year. It's not a home run move, but that's OK. There's little financial risk and the Bucks are certainly a better, more balanced roster now than they were 12 hours ago.
Dunleavy may never recapture the breakout form of his 07/08 season, but the 31-year-old has shown he can be a high-efficiency shooter (59.3% true shooting, 40.3% from three last year) while doing a little bit of everything else in both starting and bench roles. The 6'9" veteran led Indiana in net +/- a year ago (+6.2) as the Pacers were better offensively and defensively when Dunleavy was on the court. On the downside, knee injuries have limited his effectiveness in recent years and he won't make the Bucks any more athletic, but his numbers rebounded somewhat last year and the Bucks will hope he can deliver more of the same.
Looking at the Bucks' updated cap situation below, there's still a reasonable amount of flexibility with which to round out the roster. While it was initially reported that Dunleavy's deal would take up part of the Bucks' MLE, the more cap-effective approach would appear to be to renounce the MLE and use cap space to sign Dunleavy. Before the two moves, Milwaukee had around $4.2 million in cap space if they renounced the $5 million MLE, but by renouncing the MLE they would also gain access to the new $2.5 million exception given to teams with cap space.
Dealing Dooling shaved an additional $2.25 million off the Bucks' payroll, which makes the benefit of using cap space even more obvious. Consider: by using the MLE to sign Dunleavy, Milwaukee would only have around $1.25 million to spend on outside free agents (note that Mbah a Moute can always be signed using the Early Bird Exception while min players such as Leuer/Hobson can be signed regardless of the cap). By trading Dooling, the Bucks would increase their cap space to around $6.4 million before factoring in the Dunleavy move, which in turn would leave around $2.7 million plus the aforementioned $2.5 million cap exception after signing Dunleavy. Those two exceptions can't be combined, but it does afford the Bucks greater flexibility in the event they want to sign Joel Przybilla or some other backup big man.
The Bucks also continue to stockpile fairly modest, short-term deals that could also come in handy should they want to make a larger trade down the road. Though the Bucks' cap number is still projected over $50 million next year as well, a significant chunk of that will be in the form of expiring contracts.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
a guy like milsap
is still a theoretical possible addition – right? we just have to send as much salary as we add. (assuming the space gors to a big.)
i need a keyboard
by unklchuk on Dec 9, 2011 4:53 AM CST via mobile reply actions
I have a small prediction
If the BH braintrust is right that we’re sending a 2nd, this is my projection:
We’re sending Mr. Dooling and our 2nd rounder, presumably sooner.
We’re getting their their 2nd rounder, presumably later.
The two teams’ thinking being that the trade exception is a little more valuable than Sir Keyon – thus the swap of picks.
I won’t believe that we’re paying Boston a whole-and-complete 2nd to take Keyon Dooling, Esquire, off our hands – our fervent purpose then being to overpay Prince Moute — more than, say, $4.5mill/yr — until I read it in a source of truth & wisdom like the J-S. Although I am not an ecstatic occupant of The Dooling Bus, I hold him to be not trash. It should not be necessary to flat-out bribe Boston to take him. If it is necessary to bribe, I would consider it another of those little Hammond moves that are negative but presumably permit something positive to happen — double-but too often turn out worse than projected.
Having relieved myself on that, I shall now shower, meet with a client, and buy breakfast with part of the check he’s giving me. There are no 2nd-rounders involved in my morning. May your day be full of firsts.
Cap-wise it's certainly *possible*
The main challenge there is that I don’t know what exactly the Bucks would offer for him. Jazz wouldn’t want any of the Bucks’ higher priced guys (Jax, Beno, Gooden) and I don’t think the lower-priced guys are worth enough in isolation or together unless you’re throwing multiple first rounders in (which I’d be very hesitant to do).
Jefferson would probably be a more reasonable target because of his larger contract, but I’m not sure if they will eventually take a straight salary dump or what. He only has a couple years left on his deal ($29 million), so it’s not like he’s got some long-term albatross deal that they’ll do anything to move.
Get us a backup 5 Mr. Hammond
And I’ll be somewhat happy going into the season.
By the way am I the only one who thinks the Hornets were a better team before the trade got vetoed?
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Depends on what you think about the long-term viability of Paul's knees.
SB Nation Brew Hoop - Editor | SB Nation Midwest News Desk Contributor | SB Nation Chicago - Writer | Twitter: @stevevonhorn
by Steve von Horn on Dec 9, 2011 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
They were better with Scola, Martin etc IMO
Houston may be the one team that benefited from the veto depending on your opinion.
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
What about Turiaf?
Apparently the Knicks want to move him – however, what would it take to get him? Ersan and a 2nd round pick?
Also … I love the dunleavy signing. Low risk and investment, and fills a need.
by victor s on Dec 9, 2011 10:38 AM CST via mobile reply actions
100% agree on Dunleavy
In regard to Turiaf I am not so sure that Ersan has much of a market atm, that being said I’m sure the Knicks could use a player like him.
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Not sure of the salary match ups with new york, but i would think Ersan would be ideal for several teams – he’s a decent big man off the bench, with a relatively cheap expiring contract.
by victor s on Dec 9, 2011 11:15 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Possibly
We’ll see in the next few days, I really hope we can move him.
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Just saw on hoopshype.com that Denver pursing Luc
If they offer more than 4.5per, I say let him walk…
by victor s on Dec 9, 2011 11:39 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Let the market determine the value
…they say. And I guess they’re right. It may be noted, though, that in the NBA the market value is not infrequently mind-boggling. I’m trying to prepare myself to be boggled.
And I’m preparing myself to hear John Hammond say, “We strongly wanted Luc back, and were passionately determined to match any reasonable offer. However, this offer could not have been matched without hurting our team. We won’t do that to our fans.”
And if a journalist asks (dreaming here) what move the team intends to make instead of re-signing Luc, I expect some variation on a line that has become rather famous: “Were we close to doing something else? Not really.”
Surprise me Hammonds! I deserve comeuppance. Throw us a power power forward and a backup center. I have an apology for doubting you ready to go, right on the tip of my tongue.
unkchuk reminded me of the system I created last year!
Reintroduction of the penalty system for typing Hammonds instead of Hammond…even if it is an honest mistake:
Behold, The Hammond Badge of Dishonor:

SB Nation Brew Hoop - Editor | SB Nation Midwest News Desk Contributor | SB Nation Chicago - Writer | Twitter: @stevevonhorn
by Steve von Horn on Dec 9, 2011 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
Remember:
It can be rightfully used as a split personality thing. Ex:
Hammond makes the good moves, like letting Charlie Villanueva go.
Hammonds makes the bad moves, like resigning John Salmons.
SB Nation Brew Hoop - Editor | SB Nation Midwest News Desk Contributor | SB Nation Chicago - Writer | Twitter: @stevevonhorn
by Steve von Horn on Dec 9, 2011 12:48 PM CST up reply actions
Oh Bryan.......
And in another surprising development, the Raptors are said to have made a deal for Mikael Pietrus thus fulfilling their dream of a majority Euro roster.
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
If that's the case
We can always trade him to the Raps for the 2012 first
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Their 2012 dirst sorry
Which could in fact be the first overall
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Here is a link to Draft Express page on Mr. Miralles
No scouting report for this 29 year old.
Maybe Jennings gave Hammond a tip based on his experience in the Italian league about how Miralles is an unappreciated gem over there.
by Brick's house on Dec 9, 2011 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
1400 hours
Let the side show begin
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
BTW, news-ites are...
Little scraps of news information, bigger than quarks, but small enough that important people pay them no mind. They’re kind of a specialty of mine.
RealGM shows Miralles as 0’ 0" and 0 lbs. As I said elsewhere, that sounds about right for a Bucks PF.
Does 2pm have a significance? Is that when Stern comes back from lunch – on good days?
by unklchuk on Dec 9, 2011 1:06 PM CST reply actions 2 recs
I thought that signings can become "official"
At 2PM eastern
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Ad FA news rolls in, make sure to check this link for details and a compact form to know what is happening...
http://www.peachtreehoops.com/2011/12/9/2622820/2011-nba-rumors-free-agent-scoreboard-by-sbnation
SB Nation Brew Hoop - Editor | SB Nation Midwest News Desk Contributor | SB Nation Chicago - Writer | Twitter: @stevevonhorn
nice summation
“The Milwaukee Bucks spent some cash in the 2010 free agency and came up empty, striking out on Drew Gooden and John Salmons. Milwaukee managed to unload Salmons for Beno Udrih and also sent away Corey Maggette for Stephen Jackson. In the draft, the Bucks added Tobias Harris, a combo forward who could be a couple years away. Is there more room for adjustment for Bucks GM John Hammond, or has he gotten himself stuck?”
Gonna try to remember that word about Hammond: “stuck”
Marcus Thornton 5y/40m
Wow good thing the owners are learning how to control themselves.
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Tyreke, Thornton, Jimmer, Salmons...
I don’t get it. Only defense is that they have to get up to the minimum salary number, but that’s a lot of money for a guy who put up numbers on a crap team for 25 games. Feels very Ben Gordon-like.
Dont know if that one
Or Big Baby 4/26 is my vote for worst deal so far.
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Big Baby next to D. Howard, sounds OK
Big Baby next to Bynum or Brook Lopez, yeesh. Not enough rebounding or defense.
by Brick's house on Dec 9, 2011 2:51 PM CST up reply actions
I actually like that deal
At some point, the Kings had to pull the trigger and start spending on players they want to go to battle with, and Tom Haberstroh tweeted a comparison between Thornton and Eric Gordon’s numbers (hint: they were very similar). The Kings did have plenty of cash to burn, so why not splurge a bit on a pretty good player?
Then I dub thee Dan Hammonds
Accent on the “s”
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Is there any etymological authenticity to...
…the practice of disparaging somebody by adding an “s” to the end of their last name?
Such as the Saxons, before they fell in with the Anglos, having briefly had a king who combined two traits they (being incorrect well before political incorrectness was invented) despised:
because he was a pacifist and refused to chop off the heads of enemies, even to get the party started;
because he spoke with a speech impediment, where it sounded as if he was adding "s"es to many words.
So when the King said “He is a humans being, like wes are, and does nots deserve to be killeds” there was much laughter. And, of course, much imitation.
So that, children, is how the practice of funning folks by adding an “s” to their name got started. Knowing your history makes your sarcasm much sharper. Now… let’s dissect our live frogs.
Haha! Priceless chuk!
Fear the 'Dear'? You're damn right I'm scared of my wife!
by Big Crazy Dave on Dec 9, 2011 4:36 PM CST up reply actions
Almost reminds me of Pontius Pilate
In “The Life of Bwian”
"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian
Don't forget his friend.
“Biggus Dickus”
by Jacob Grinyer on Dec 9, 2011 6:07 PM CST up reply actions
Has to be my absolute fave Monty Python movie :)
’He’s not the Messiah, he’s a very naughty boy!’
Fear the 'Dear'? You're damn right I'm scared of my wife!
by Big Crazy Dave on Dec 9, 2011 6:28 PM CST up reply actions
I am deficient in my Monty Python
sorry
but something stirred slightly in memory; maybe I saw that long ago
Needless to say, your post was very 'Python-esque' :)
Fear the 'Dear'? You're damn right I'm scared of my wife!
by Big Crazy Dave on Dec 9, 2011 6:29 PM CST up reply actions

by 




















