Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

Hard sell on why Marshon Brooks should be the pick at 10(updated with stats/phys comparisons)




Marshon Brooks should be the choice over Alec Burks or Klay Thompson, in my humble opinion, my gut tells me he is the one that can help. Say no to "the Jimmer, and thank the lord if Kemba Walker slips to pick ten, otherwise I'm all in on Brooks to the Bucks!!! (how bad can he be if Larry Bird was wowed by him in workouts)

Star-divide

Its not a reach, the websites and NBA gm's are just a little slow on the uptake, as you've noticed that once Brooks started doing his workouts he jumped up on most mocks from the 20's into the teens. In my opinion he is the perfect pick for this Bucks team. We all know this team needs scoring and thats what Brooks will bring as soon as he steps into the gym. He did after all score just under 25 points per game in the toughest,deepest conference in the country and he did that while shooting a healthy 48.3% on his FG%. Don't listen to the ignorant claims about him just getting numbers because he played on a bad team or that somehow he is this wild, ball hog who plays a losing style of play, thats nonsense talk. I mean Klay Thompson the SG from Washington averaged more turnovers than Brooks, 3.4 to 3.1 and Thompson only shot 43.6% for his FG%.(going against the pac-10)

Physically Brooks really fits the bill for what you want from the SG spot, he is 6'5" with the wingspan of a PF/C, 7'1" which is freakish. He also put up a 38.5" max vertical leap, which is 7 inches more than Thompson and even 2.5" more than SG Alec Burks. Sure we all know that testing numbers don't equal success, see Joe Alexander. But lets face it, the NBA is dominated by elite level athletes and you need to be one to compete, the tests shows that Brooks is on the same plane as guys he will be going against.

 He has shown a game that will suit him well in the league with lots of isolations and a 24 second shot clock. He excels at creating his own shots off the dribble using his ball handling, footwork, and length. The Bucks need another player that can do that and convert at a good clip. He uses lots of pull up jumpers, spin moves, and floaters but is totally capable of hitting the NBA 3 point shot at a respectable rate.(34%/hit 67 3's last year) You need to project his game and imagine how great he can be coming off of curls or screens as a catch/shoot player also, even though they didn't use him like that much in college. He really has the package to be used in many different ways to get offense. He also shows an above average knack for drawing contact and getting to the foul line at a really high rate. Again, this is something the Bucks need.(219 att. last year) He can handle the ball like a PG and shows total confidence in his ability to dribble with either hand.

 He is not just an offensive weapon, he has the athletic ability and length to be a serious defender at the next level. He showed glimpses of that last year and averaged 1.5 steals and 1.2 blocks last year, those are great numbers from your two guard. I'm not saying he is an all defensive first team guy but he clearly has the tools to become a plus type of defender. He also rebounds at an amazing clip for a guard, pulling down 7 rebounds per game last year in the Big East, that shows that he has good instincts and will mix it up.

Every prospect has negatives or areas to work on and Brooks is no different. He will need to get stronger. He will need to show that he can make the right read and deliver the pass. He will need to improve his deep 3 point shooting. He will need to play defense with the same intensity and focus that he plays with on the other end.(or we all know Skiles will yank him)

 I feel like he is the right man with the right skills to really help this roster right away. Not only that, he has a lot of room to get better and become a 20 point per game NBA scorer down the road. His combination of skills and physical attributes makes me feel like he is worth pulling the trigger at pick ten and not watching him get picked a few picks later and regretting it for the next decade while we all watch him blow up for some other team. There are other players in the ten range that I like and think will be decent players but nobody with the unique package that Brooks will bring to this team that needs a big time guard/wing player.

 I've been on the same page as Hammonds for the past 3 first round picks, I wanted Alexander(shouldn't admit that),Jennings, and Sanders. I'm praying that I can go 4 for 4 with this one and Hammonds will pull a wildcard surprise by picking Brooks!!!

Just watch this 4 minute highlight video then tell me you still want Klay Thompson, he scores in just about every way possible in this 4 minute clip.(Kobe Bryant lite)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v8W2pumHX8&feature=related

Showing off his sweet jumper

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mq-JMf1szk&NR=1

Interview pre draft(no 3rd person references)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qm-G0z3evJo

Physical/Statistical Comparisons(all stats from last year)

Brooks         6'5.25 195  wingspan 7'1"   max vert. 38.5"  Bench Reps 5 

Burks            6'6"  193    wingspan 6'10"  max vert. 36"  Bench Reps 5

Thompson  6'7.25" 206  wingspan 6'9"  max vert. 31.5"  Bench Reps 15

                    Pts    FG%   Reb   Ast/TO   3%        FT%       Stl    Blks    3's made    FT Att.   Min/gm  Age

Brooks          24.6  48.3%   7.0   2.5/3.1   34%      77.2%   1.5    1.2       67            219              36.5     22

Burks            20.5  46.9%   6.5   2.9/2.6   29.2%   82.5%   1.1     .3         28            302             31.4      19

Thompson     21.6  43.6%   5.2   3.7/3.4   39.8%   83.8%   1.6     .9         98           185              34.7      21

Might be coming down to what kind of impression Mr. Brooks can make on the big cheese John Hammond during his second workout on the 21st.  Glad to know the Bucks must be envisioning some of the same things that I see this kid adding to the Bucks or they wouldn't be bringing him in.  I hope he hits his workout out of the park!  I do still worry about Charlotte pulling a haymaker out of left field and taking Brooks at number 9 or trading that pick to a team like Indiana so they can move up and get Brooks. 

Poll
If Hammonds goes guard, whom would you prefer?
Marshon Brooks
37 votes
Alec Burks
14 votes
Klay Thompson
2 votes

53 votes | Poll has closed

FanPosts are user-generated blogs-within-the-blog. We ask that members abide by our community guidelines and keep things respectable. Thanks.

Comment 69 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Still leaning toward Burks

But Brooks is my 2nd choice and it’s close. marshon if drafted would instantly have the 4th best career of any Providence Friar to play for the Bucks.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 16, 2011 7:56 PM CDT reply actions  

Brooks is growing on me too

I’m still in favor of Burks at 10, but I wouldn’t necessarily be upset if we traded back a few spots and grabbed Brooks in the high teens, though it would depend on what we got back in the trade. Brooks is almost certainly a better pure scorer than Burks, but I think Burks still rounds out as a better all-around player. I still really like the prospect of running Burks out as a secondary creator alongside Jennings or Dooling. Brooks’ “ball-hogging” is almost certainly overblown, but the negative A/TO ration, and accompanying -3.87 PPR, still scare me a bit.

by Dan Sinclair on Jun 16, 2011 9:27 PM CDT reply actions  

I like Burks too but...

I’m not sold that he has the swagger to be a real go to scorer in the NBA, I feel like he might be one of those guys that kind of gets drown out when he gets to the big show and be lost trying to fit in or find his role. I have seen many of his games and I like his driving ability with both hands but he doesn’t have the variety of moves or range that Brooks displays. Most of his points came on driving lay ins or transition dunks, I worry that defenders will not respect his outside shot and that will make it hard for him to blow by NBA defenders. I can imagine him struggling even more if he is asked to play both PG and SG. He is only 19 and that makes him intriguing as to how much better is he going to get in the next couple years?(thats the big question) With Brooks I see that edge of supreme confidence that even as a rookie he knows he’s good enough to get buckets and he’ll go for it. He shows a real post up game to go along with his driving skills and perimeter game, you know the Bucks really need another go to option on offense so bad, I think Brooks could get 14-16 points a game right away as a starter or a 6th man role. He will also get garbage putbacks, they can post him, they can run screens for curls or catch/shoots, they can iso him on the wing or at the top of the key and he is a good enough shooter to space the floor for everyone else. Thats what I see from watching him and I really think that if he had played college ball at Uconn or North Carolina or Duke people would look at him as a top 5 player in this class. He didn’t get the hype machine or national exposure and cause he was on a bad team people overlooked him and his production.

by puremisery on Jun 16, 2011 10:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's possible

You have a lot of confidence in the guy, and he does seem like a pretty fair bet to be a good scorer, but I’d be surprised if he could do everything you’ve described in the NBA, at least right away. It’s reasonable to expect his shooting percentages to drop from their NCAA levels, simply due to facing better defenses and individual defenders.

by Dan Sinclair on Jun 17, 2011 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

dude should fire his agent and hit up puremisery to do the leg work....makes a good case

whether it pans out in reality well there are so many factors really everyone of us is pretty much swinging and hoping

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 17, 2011 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Damn.... you make a really great case, my friend.

But how’s his attitude? I read a blurb that in one of his interviews, he answered all questions in the 3rd person. Kinda diva-like, if you ask me.

But who cares…. let him be a diva if he’s as good as you make him out to be ; )

by victor s on Jun 16, 2011 11:36 PM CDT reply actions  

BJ's hates when people talk about themselves in the 3rd person......now where did I put my tiara

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 17, 2011 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think it is more weird than him being a diva

I have watched more of Brooks than the other Burks or Thompson, but his attitude on the court is great. I think he is at an elite level of competitiveness. It’s clear he emulates Kobe to an incredible extent, but is that a bad thing? He really seems to have that attitude of he will do what ever it takes to succeed. That is why I like Brooks more than the other shooting guards. Klay Thompson wants to keep doing what he does and that’s hitting threes, which is not a bad thing. I don’t have a very good feel for Burks. I like him, but he isn’t as safe a pick as Brooks. I think worst case scenario for either player, Brooks is a better player. Best case for both and I see them as having about the same ceiling.

by Finkle_is_Einhorn on Jun 18, 2011 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

well said, I pretty much agree with your assessment, Brooks has a little swagger

and thats a good thing, if you don’t believe in yourself who the heck will??? Again, why wouldn’t Brooks want to copy Kobe, the other player who he reminds me of a little bit is Nick Young, a cross between Kobe and Nick Young would be good for the bucks. As I’ve said a million times I just think Brooks is the perfect prospect for this Bucks roster and for the long term.

by puremisery on Jun 18, 2011 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brooks interests me.

He definitely seems to have modeled his game after Kobe, for better or for worse. Still, I think it’ll be really hard for him to adjust to be able to pull off his moves against NBA players, not to mention he really seems to need the ball in his hands to be effective.

The Artist Formerly known as Speedingtime/Speedy

www.BrewHoop.com

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 17, 2011 12:09 PM CDT reply actions  

I think he's definately one of the "big 3" on the Bucks wish list

But still say they have Burks and K Thompson ahead of him.

I’ve taken Jordan Hamilton [for no particular reason] out of the running ; )

by victor s on Jun 17, 2011 2:19 PM CDT reply actions  

I think there was already a thread on this, but Minny is looking to shop the #2 pick...

and they supposedly want an established C.

So….. would you deal Bogut for the #2 pick? Maybe picks 2 & 20? Pick #2 and a MN player?

Hmmmm…

by victor s on Jun 17, 2011 2:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Nope

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

And there would have to be a player coming back anyway

have to have a salary match so it might be Darko + someone else

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

as Kahn says Darko is manna from heaven

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 18, 2011 1:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd have to be pretty greedy as the Bucks GM

Maybe #2, #20, Wes Johnson, Flynn for Bogut (maybe a filler not named Jennings or Sanders). Bogut being traded means the Bucks are completely rebuilding so the only reasonable players on MN of interest are #2, #20, Wes Johnson, Anthony Randolph, and Johnny Flynn. Thats assuming they won’t move Beasley, Love, or Rubio, but Ridnour and Darko should have no part in this rebuilding effort b/c they are too old and the Bucks are officially not trying to win anything.

by FearTheDeer on Jun 17, 2011 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Strings IMO & Blockbuster

Starters: Jennings, Salmons, Beasley, Love, Bogut with Delfino 6th man

2nd String: Rubio, Wes, Delfino, Gooden, Darko
3rd String: Ridnour, Webster, LRMAM, Ersan, Pekovic
4th String: Flynn, Ellington, Maggette, Randolph, Sanders
Leftovers: Brockman, Dooling, CDR, Tolliver, Hayward

Blockbuster proposed (works in the trade checker):
Bogut, Delfino, Ersan for
#2, #20, Wes, Flynn, Randolph, Pekovic

MN: Rubio/Ridnour, Delfino/Ellington, Beasley/Webster, Love/Ersan, Bogut/Darko

Bucks get young assets (25 & Under): Jennings, Flynn, Wes, LRMAM, Sanders, Randolph, Brockman,Pekovic, #2, #20, #10, #40, (Hobson)…just gotta figure out what to do with Dooling, Maggette, Gooden, Salmons. Nice positional diversity of young assets.

by FearTheDeer on Jun 17, 2011 5:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I should mention however

I’d rather just not trade bogut and keep trying to win now

by FearTheDeer on Jun 17, 2011 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Randolph yes, Flynn maybe

Johnson nty. he’s already 23, shooting is about the only thing he really does, and last year he shot 39.7%.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

exile Bogut to Minny....harsh harsh

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 18, 2011 1:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know it's not a popular idea - but it'd be a chance to add one, possibly 2 or 3 young stars

For an aging, defensive-minded player w/ injury concerns.

Pick 2, 10 and 20 could set up the Bucks nicely for the next decade.

Hell, get Kahn to throw in next yrs 1st, too ; )

by victor s on Jun 18, 2011 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

While it might be wise

Not ready to rebuild yet. 26=aging? Holy crap what does that make me?

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 18, 2011 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

yeah haha I feel alot older after that comment

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 18, 2011 1:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

Lol. sorry, CB & BJs

I meant “older” mainly because of the injuries – but he’s only got 3-4 strong yrs left IMO

by victor s on Jun 18, 2011 5:09 PM CDT up reply actions  

haha no worries.....I still feel he had a good season considering the injury he was coming off

defensively he was excellent, and the lack of recognition was disturbing, offensive wise it was a struggle no doubt, but you put that down directly to the elbow, his FT shooting was shocking……….Im expecting a big few seasons next up so dont throw in the towell just yet……….down under big guys tend to develop a bit slower in Australina Rules so hopefully the same applies for Bogut

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 18, 2011 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

#2, 20 and a player? [Darko, Ridnour, W Johnson]

I’d do it in a heartbeat.

I love Bogues, but he’s Ben Wallace w/ a mediocre hook shot – and he’s not getting any younger…

Having 3 picks in the top 20 would really allow JH some options for the long-term of the franchise

by victor s on Jun 17, 2011 3:25 PM CDT reply actions  

Honestly none of those players really excite me

If it was Love, maybe but not those 3 guys. You would probably have to take martell Webster anyway.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just an FYI

David Aldridge has Brooks at 30 to the Bulls.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 3:44 PM CDT reply actions  

Seems a bit low

DraftExpress has him at 15 to the Pacers.

The Artist Formerly known as Speedingtime/Speedy

www.BrewHoop.com

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 17, 2011 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Just goes to show you

That no one really knows for sure

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

one of those sites has Burks going after Brooks, pick 19 I think,

this has to be the craziest draft ever in terms of all the variables

by puremisery on Jun 17, 2011 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

I read somewhere that he has been killing people in the workouts

which would make sense with all the moves he has, I guess Larry Bird was really hot to trot for him after the Pacers workout, don’t the Pacers already have a bunch of young wing players???

by puremisery on Jun 17, 2011 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

They could use a PF imo

or some PG help(Jimmer?)

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 17, 2011 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think if his agent and the Bucks can get him back in town before the draft

so he can work out in front of Hammonds, it could really happen, doubt they will take him unless Hammonds gets to see him up close and meet with him but I’m just projecting. Look out though if Brooks gets the wine em dine em next week:) I just can’t remember a pick with so many different names linked to it, I’ve seen all these names in our spot at ten over the past few weeks from the major draft sites.
Alec Burks
Donatas Motijunas
Jimmer Fredette
Marcus Morris
Bismack Biyambo
Jan Vesely
Klay Thompson
still waiting for somebody to see the light and move my guy Brooks up to pick 10!
Geez, Marcus Morris really seems like an odd fit in Milwaukee, decent player but don’t we already have a bunch of undersized PF’s???

by puremisery on Jun 17, 2011 4:17 PM CDT reply actions  

My dreams are getting crushed when I read this little ditty from hoopsworld.com

“Marshon Brooks at #9? Providence star Marshon Brooks had one of his best workouts of the month in Charlotte. Word is he was electric on both ends of the floor and not only shot the ball well but really defended in a way the Bobcats were not expecting.

Brooks has been on the rise in this draft after drawing Kobe Bryant comparisons from his trainer Tim Grover. Brooks has since tried to distance himself from those comparisons saying he was more like Atlanta’s Jamal Crawford. However in Charlotte word is he was more Kobe than he’ll admit.

Brooks is said to be one of the top name on the Indiana Pacers draft board at #15. With Jimmer Fredette likely gone before the Pacers pick, Brooks looks like the favorite to go at #15, meaning if Charlotte wants him they either need to move down to #14 in a deal with Houston, which is possible, or they have to take Brooks at #9.

The Bobcats are also said to be very high on Jordan Hamilton who did not work out well in his first workout and the Bobcats are bringing him back in for a second look.

The Cats are also said to be very high on Tobias Harris and with Rich Cho now in the fold as General Manager, it seems the Bobcats are tipping their hand a little more with second workouts. So assuming things go as planned the Cats could come out of this draft with not only Marshon Brooks but maybe Jordan Hamilton too."

Read more NBA news and insight: http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=20157#ixzz1PZf8DGqb

by puremisery on Jun 17, 2011 5:17 PM CDT reply actions  

CBA Help Request Again

Saw an article talking about Labour negotiations for the NBA and there was a statement that doesn’t make sense to me “It’s unclear how the NBA proposes to implement a hard cap with guaranteed contracts.” Are the two not exclusive? Is that not why the NFL gets creative with player contracts and re-negotiating them? Are they worried it will be too confusing for some of the current GMs?

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 18, 2011 12:29 PM CDT reply actions  

I think there are a few issues I can ID off the top of my head...

(1) instituting a hard cap will need transition or amnesty clauses to allow the current deals (which are structured to take advantage of the myriad of salary cap exceptions) to run their course or be integrated in a creative fashion.

(2) hard cap with guaranteed contracts still leaves an issue if what happens when players get injured Michael Redd style…you would likely still need to have some types if exceptions to allow teams space to overcome injuries. Obviously in the NFL the contracts are not guaranteed, and the value comes in the signing bonuses and roster bonuses, and players are routinely cut before the contract expires for far less than the total contract value.

So I agree with you, it would be almost impossible to have guaranteed contracts with a true hard cap…I’d guess they would be aimin for fewer exceptions overall, and maybe something closer to a hard cap than the softie system big markets use to game the system under the current CBA.

"Don't worry, I've got an idea. An idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about..."

by Steve von Horn on Jun 18, 2011 1:13 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

Doesn't the NHL have fully guaranteed contracts with their hard cap?

I suppose this doesn’t really matter in the long run. If the owners still want a hard cap, there’s a 100% chance of a lockout and probably missed games. The owners will probably go right back to their original proposal with no full guarantees since they have noting to lose. Could be nothing but a PR move by the owners.

The Artist Formerly known as Speedingtime/Speedy

www.BrewHoop.com

by Jacob Grinyer on Jun 18, 2011 1:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think guaranteed contracts is a concession piece

They know they wont get it so they’ll give it up if the players give up something. And the NBA (small market teams especially)need a harder cap. Yes they would have to phase it in with what exists but I think it can be done.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 18, 2011 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Worst case long view of Brooks..

to me is that he has a similar career to a Nick Young or Jamal Crawford which isn’t horrible for a team that needs scoring. I think he can be better than those guys defensively though, especially under a coach like Skiles. His length is really going to help him defending other guards.

by puremisery on Jun 18, 2011 8:08 PM CDT reply actions  

Wouldn't worst case be someone like Kirk Snyder? Those other guys seem more like a ceiling to me. Brooks is already 22 going on 23 after all.

Kirk Snyder seems like a good comp to me for a worst case, just a flameout of the gunner.

"Don't worry, I've got an idea. An idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about..."

by Steve von Horn on Jun 18, 2011 8:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or maybe even Kareem Rush?

"Don't worry, I've got an idea. An idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about..."

by Steve von Horn on Jun 18, 2011 8:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good call. Kareem Rush comparison withdrawn.

Replace that with the journeyman chucker Al Thornton. Not quite the same position in the NBA, but I think it’s a bit closer in style of play. He’s a one-on-one player who isn’t a good passer and struggles because he doesn’t get to serve as the focal point of an NBA offense and doesn’t do much to create for teammates. He also came out of college as an old prospect (at age 23, I think), so he really didn’t get much better in his transition.

"Don't worry, I've got an idea. An idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about..."

by Steve von Horn on Jun 18, 2011 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I forgot about Snyder but he never put up numbers in college like Brooks did he?

you might be right about a ceiling, I just have a feeling he is going to be an all star SG in a few years.

by puremisery on Jun 18, 2011 8:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

If you adjust it to ceiling, that is fine enough for me.

As I said in my draft piece, everyone gets to choose a couple guys as their “picks” when it comes to the draft. It’s time to try and project skills and physical attributes into the future and into a far more talented basketball environment, and anyone can be right (which could alternatively be stated as everyone will be wrong, but let’s stay positive). That’s what makes it so fun.

Just like any other prediction, it’s always the power of the underlying reasons/reasoning for the prediction that make the guess compelling or confounding. You have some decent reasons for being hopeful about his transition to the NBA, I just tend to go the other way on Brooks and don’t think he will adjust to playing off ball very well, which I think he will inevitably have to do for most of his NBA career.

"Don't worry, I've got an idea. An idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about..."

by Steve von Horn on Jun 18, 2011 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

DX says worst case is

Henry Domercant. Had to look him up =/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Domercant

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 19, 2011 7:22 PM CDT reply actions  

I followed the link and I still don't know who he is or what he has done.

"Don't worry, I've got an idea. An idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about..."

by Steve von Horn on Jun 19, 2011 7:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Led the NCAA in scoring one year

2002–03 NCAA Championship scoring leader (27.9 points per game) Kind of funny Biyombo’s worst case is taj Gibson and Brooks worst case is some dude no one has heard of.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 19, 2011 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't remember Henry at all, I did look up Ncaa scoring leaders last week though cuz

I was trying to find someone like Marshon Brooks who averaged over 24pts per game and shot 48% and also played in a major conference, I didn’t have much luck finding those criteria, Kevin Durant and Kevin Martin were two of the only big names, most of the highest scoring guys were from smaller schools and 3rd tier conferences.

by puremisery on Jun 19, 2011 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

on Biyambo

he can do two things right away at an NBA level, rebound and block shots, but man did you see the workout video, he was having a tough time making shots with nobody defending him, it wasn’t pretty. I can’t remember that much about how raw was Serge Ibaka when he came out a few years ago, but I don’t think he was this raw.

by puremisery on Jun 19, 2011 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Brooks is picking up steam in my poll up top, that surprises me with all the votes

Burks got on the main page poll. Doesn’t a backcourt of Jennings and Brooks with Delfino or Salmons at the SF have a good ring to it??? The Bucks might actually top 100 points a few times next year!

by puremisery on Jun 19, 2011 9:44 PM CDT reply actions  

take out Salmons and sounds even better ;)

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 19, 2011 10:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

As electric as Brooks has been in workouts, I still gotta believe Milw takes Burks if he's there

He seems a “safer” pick and fills a need – though i’m down w/ either, plus K Thompson

by victor s on Jun 19, 2011 9:47 PM CDT reply actions  

if they honestly feel Brooks is better go for it I say, but I agree either Burks, Brooks, K Thompson would suit me

That," says LeBron, "is for everyone that watches me play. They witness something special. You're all a witness.

by ILIKEBJ'S on Jun 19, 2011 10:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

For a fun quiz try this

http://www.sporcle.com/games/gjackson/NCAA_top_scorers

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jun 19, 2011 10:09 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
NBA Draft Big Board (15+)
Whammyfy2_small
State of the Milwaukee Bucks
Lanier1_small
The Canada Bucks Big Board 2012
Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer