Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bob Sapp Denies Throwing Fights

Bulls 107, Bucks 100: Milwaukee Falters Against Derrick Rose In Second Half

Box Score

I probably don't have to tell you where Andrew Bogut's absence hurts the Milwaukee Bucks. Mostly because every answer to that question is the right answer.

With their big man out of commission, the Bucks got hammered on the offensive boards and struggled to contain Derrick Rose all night. The Bulls boast a talented and physical front line that abused Milwaukee's patchwork defense to the tune of 20 offensive rebounds. Chicago grabbed 40 percent of their own misses. While Drew Gooden racked up his own numbers under the basket (15 total rebounds), Brandon Jennings was Milwaukee's second-leading rebounder, perhaps a telling fact in itself.

Yet for a team that supposedly hangs its hat on defense, the Bucks trailed by just one point at halftime and clawed back into the game late in the fourth quarter despite routinely getting torched by the reigning MVP. The Bulls currently boast the 2nd-best defensive efficiency in the NBA, but they had no answer for the hot-shooting Brandon Jennings in the first half. It was a point-guard duel wrapped up in a clash of styles, as both Jennings and Rose kept the pressure on in their own trademark fashions.

Star-divide

It was a scorching start for Jennings, who came out firing from deep and beat a sluggish-looking Bulls defense for buckets in close. After he sank an off-balance three under heavy pressure from Rose, you could've been forgiven for thinking a truly epic performance was unfolding in the United Center.

But the second half was another story, as Derrick Rose quickly set about swinging the needle on the point guard matchup back toward himself. Aided by little more than a high ball screen, Rose had the Bucks' defenders spinning in circles as they tried to predict which direction his crossover would take him. Rotating defenders stepped up to cut off drives, only to see him sidestep his way to an easy layup. To borrow a line from Steve, Rose was the brush coloring the painted area. Even with a relatively poor showing from the free-throw line (6-10), he scored 34 points to lead all scorers.

Still, the Bucks hung around after the break, buoyed by an unlikely source: Jon Leuer, back from the grave (or so one might have thought)! Leuer came off the bench in relief of Ersan Ilyasova, who had a promising-looking performance derailed by foul trouble that limited him to only 10 minutes. Leuer showed no signs of rust on offense, sinking his first three jumpers and stepping up as a reliable pressure valve for a Milwaukee offense that found the going a bit tougher without Jennings raining shots from deep.

Without Bogut, though, the Bucks couldn't hold back the metaphorical flood waters, and with Jennings' deep shot failing him in the second half, there were precious few ways to claw back into the lead. So the game ended as many might have expected, albeit with a surprisingly thrilling beginning and middle.

Three Bucks

Brandon Jennings. If I could single out first-half Brandon Jennings, I would. Brandon looked unstoppable in the early going and finished the half with 19 points on 7-11 shooting (including an end-of-half heave). Unfortunately, he couldn't keep it up for the final 24 minutes, shooting just 3-11 after the break. That included a few clutch buckets late in the fourth quarter to keep the score close, but the many misses certainly took the sheen off a glittering start. Still, it extends Jennings' streak of consecutive 20-point games to 6.

Drew Gooden. Drew somehow flailed, chucked, and stumbed his way to a strong overall performance. Going 10-10 from the free throw line to offset 6-14 shooting, Gooden scored 23 points, grabbed 15 boards, and dished 6 assists (which led the team). He committed his fair share of Goodenisms, throwing passes 4 feet above teammates heads and rocketing shots off the backboard, but he pleased his fantasy owners if nothing else.

Jon Leuer. I remember this guy! It took a broken ankle from Bogut and foul trouble from Ilyasova just to get Leuer back on the court, but he quickly set about reminding everybody (Skiles) why he earned the starting gig only nine games into his career. Leuer hit from everywhere on the court, sinking his only shot from behind the arc and finishing a couple in close. We're all still searching for the reason why he was banished to the bench in the first place. If he ends up back there after tonight, I'm organizing a mob. Keep your torches and pitchforks at the ready, folks.

Three Numbers

10.6. The Bulls turn the ball over on only 13.3% of possessions, good for sixth in the NBA. The Bucks are fourth in the NBA in forcing turnovers. But Chicago won the battle of ball control, finishing with an exceptional 10.6 turnover rate.

60.6%. The game could've been far worse for Milwaukee if Chicago hadn't struggled at the foul line. The Bulls made just 20 of their 33 free-throws.

9-31. Combined shooting numbers from Milwaukee's bench players not named Jon Leuer. Stephen Jackson (4-14), Beno Udrih (1-5) and Mike Dunleavy (1-5) never found a groove.

Two Good

Brandon Without Bogut. While Bogut's absence clearly affected Milwaukee defense and rebounding, it didn't slow down Brandon Jennings. Brandon's ability to carry the team without his imposing center was an obvious question, and after one loss it hasn't totally been answered. But a strong individual performance at least inspires some confidence that his own season won't be derailed thanks to a teammate's broken ankle. At this point, it's a welcome silver lining.

Developing an identity. With Bogut potentially out until April, the Bucks have to reassess where this season is headed. Do they continue to push forward and fight for a playoff spot? Do they go with a youth movement, subtly shrugging off loss after loss in an effort to boost their lottery chances? It's a sad reality, but the sooner they settle on a decision, the better.

Two Bad

Bucks Blocked. Milwaukee is used to relying on a bevy of their own shot blockers, but tonight they saw nine of their own attempts swatted away. The Bucks got just one block apiece from Gooden and Larry Sanders.

Lacking at the Line. Sure, the Bucks made 15 of their 16 free throws. But ten of those came from Drew Gooden, meaning the rest of the roster mustered only 6. Milwaukee's shooting and ball movement are much improved this season compared to last, but they still can't get to the stripe with any regularity. As long as they rank near the bottom of the NBA in free throw rate, they'll have a hard time breaking through to the upper-level of NBA offenses.

Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

"nice" effort but looked incomplete

I wasn’t embarrassed by my team but the sense of something missing never left. They tried and did ok. They could be had.

They’ll win some. They’ll lose more. Will they find any fun? Will we?

by unklchuk on Jan 28, 2012 1:12 AM CST via Android app reply actions  

Look on the bright side,

Mock draft season is just around the corner.

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Jan 28, 2012 1:17 AM CST up reply actions  

re: Lacking at the Line

As I said in my post, this is the Bucks’ biggest problem that is drawn from the roster they have. If only we had a strong wing who was able to reliably draw fouls and make foul shots (and also shoot from outside and also pass the ball and also play hard-nosed defense and also rebound and also contest shots.)

Corey Maggette was the failed attempt at working this skill into the Bucks’ repertoire. Alec Burks was the option everyone wanted in the draft (although he’s only earned 31 attempts on the season thus far). Is there any hope of getting someone on the roster that can get to the line? Is there even room on Skiles’ offense for a player?

For the record, I still think Tobias Harris can develop into a player who fills this need. His quickness in the post combined with his good-for-a-SF handle reminds me of the herky-jerky, 20 points a night Paul Pierce.

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Jan 28, 2012 1:17 AM CST reply actions  

Jennings' 3-point work

His 4-11 performance from behind the arc is both encouraging and worrisome. It’s good, because the 4 makes represent 12 points; it’s bad because the 7 misses are 7 misses. I’ll be looking at his shot selection on the morrow.

He just eclipsed the 100-attempt mark on the season, making 37-101. Obviously, this is a huge statistical improvement (+4.3% from last year), but I get the feeling that he can get even better if he improves his shot selection.

ANECDOTE TIME! I’ve always been comfortable shooting the 3 from the very top of the key; it felt like a longer free throw. I also loved getting a pass from my left so I could catch the ball in my right hand and rotate it to where it felt natural without wasting a lot of time. Like any true-born chucker, I launched that baby up almost every time that happened.

But, of course, I made far fewer shots from that spot than I did in others where I had a clean look. The eventual answer (thanks for taping me, Dad!): I would plant my right foot on the line, but I wouldn’t put my left foot in line with it when I went up for my release. It was consistently 3-6 inches further back, which was just enough to rotate my torso mid-air a few degrees to the left, resulting in lots and lots of clangs. I mostly fixed it once I got to college, but old habits die hard, you know?

This is the sort of thing that Jennings’ coaches need to look at to help him identify which shots are good for him and which are not. Does he need to get the ball from a certain side? Is there a certain quirk in his release that nobody’s pinpointed yet? Does it happen only in the second half? Old habits die hard, but Jennings is young enough (and good enough) to kill them.

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Jan 28, 2012 1:31 AM CST reply actions  

20 minutes per game

I would like to see the Bucks’ leadership come to a consensus that they will play Sanders, Harris, Leuer, and Hobson 20 minutes a game or more for the remainder of the year. Try to see what they have in the pipeline and develop it some.

by Southern Marxist on Jan 28, 2012 8:23 AM CST reply actions  

GL with that

They have to earn their time and I’m not sure that in Leuer’s case 9-11 shooting wins him any points.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Jan 28, 2012 9:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
NBA Draft Big Board (15+)
Whammyfy2_small
State of the Milwaukee Bucks
Lanier1_small
The Canada Bucks Big Board 2012
Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer