Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Shootings Near Thunder's Arena Follow Win Over Lakers

Bucks 113, Cavaliers 112: Drew Gooden And Shaun Livingston Spark Milwaukee Comeback

Box Score

Get too excited about the Bucks, and they disappoint. Get too down on them, and they claw their way back to respectability.

It's been the pattern we've seen all year, and it continued in Cleveland on Wednesday with a gritty, often ugly, but ultimately satisfying overtime win over the shorthanded Cavs--the team that also happens to be chasing them for the East's final playoff spot. Perhaps just as importantly, Brandon Jennings put behind a turbulent week both on and off the court with a solid, aggressive night at the office (24 points, albeit on 23 shots, eight assists, five rebounds and just one turnover), looking less like the distracted, disengaged bystander he was earlier in the week and more like the assertive team leader he's been for most of the season.

Not that he didn't have help. Drew Gooden (18 of 19 points after halftime) and Shaun Livingston (11 of his 13 in fourth quarter and OT) carried the Bucks late, while Kyrie Irving's absence (concussion) and Anderson Varejao's departure (wrist) early in the second half also lowered the Bucks' degree of difficulty.

Star-divide

Then again, you wouldn't have known it from the game's opening five minutes, which saw Cleveland blitz the Bucks with a 17-2 run to start the game. It was hardly the start Scott Skiles was looking for after a less than convincing win in Toronto on Wednesday, but the Bucks' depth--namely Mike Dunleavy, Ersan Ilyasova and Stephen Jackson--again helped them weather the storm and finish the first period on a 20-3 run.

Of course, just when it appeared the Bucks might be able to open up a decent lead, their energy levels hit another lull in the second quarter, needing a buzzer-beating three from Carlos Delfino to scrape back to within four at the intermission. There would be no breakthrough for the visitors in the third either, primarily because they had no answers for Antawn Jamison (34 pts, 14/21 fg). Showing off his obnoxiously effective mixture of jump shots and random post scoop and flip shots, the veteran destroyed Ilyasova (who started the third over Luc Mbah a Moute) and Jon Brockman to the tune of 18 points in the period. Why Skiles refused to deploy Mbah a Moute against Jamison was anyone's guess, but it wouldn't be up to him for long, as Skiles collected two quick technicals late in the third after a pair of questionable (though it appeared correct) calls went against the Bucks.

With Cleveland taking an 85-77 edge into the fourth, acting head coach Jim Boylan went big in the backcourt and small up front with Livingston, Delfino, Jackson, Mbah a Moute and Ilyasova, and it began to pay immediate dividends. Cleveland's small guards had difficulty handling the bigger Bucks, while Mbah a Moute and Ilyasova were surprisingly effective containing the Cavs up front. Mbah a Moute's thunderous drive and dunk (his first points of the night) tied the game at 93 with just under six minutes left, and the Prince uncharacteristically added the Bucks' final five points of regulation with a key three point play and two clutch free throws with less than a minute remaining. By the way, did anyone else notice Luc is shooting 83% from the foul line? Me neither.

In any case, both teams had chances to win in the final minute of regulation but came up agonizingly empty. With the game tied at 92 and five seconds remaining, Jennings' clean look from the right side caromed to Jamison, who appeared to call timeout with 3.7 seconds left. That would have been bad enough, but after a moment of confusion it was determined that the outside official had whistled Gooden for an over-the-back foul, sending Jamison to the line with a chance to win it. In truth, it did appear that Gooden got a piece of Jamison from behind, but why make the call in that situation when Jamison easily came away with the ball?

Thankfully, the basketball gods seem to have a sense of justice. After drilling shot after shot from every spot on the court, Jamison uncharacteristically bricked both free throws, gifting the Bucks another golden opportunity to steal a win. But just four days after failing to get a shot off on the final play of Tuesday's loss to the Suns, the Bucks again couldn't muster a shot. Livingston took a handoff at the top of the key and looked primed to raise for a runner as time expired, but he instead tried to hit Mbah a Moute crashing in along the baseline. The horn sounded as Mbah a Moute rose for the layup, and he missed it for good measure. Here we go again?

Mericfully...no. Gooden scored on the Bucks' first two possessions of overtime while Livingston and Jennings each slashed for layups thereafter, as the Bucks played from the front for the entirety of overtime. Playing against the team he once helped to the NBA FInals, Gooden owned the final minute as well, earning a questionable charge call against Daniel Gibson and then hitting two free throws that clinched the game with four seconds left.

Three Bucks

Drew Gooden. Gooden was a non-factor early, but he came out gunning in the second half (two threes?!?), pouring in 18 of his 19 points after the intermission. Gooden was mostly content to fire up jumpers--3/6 long twos and 2/3 triples--but he hit them when they mattered most and also swatted an uncharacteristic pair of shots. Kudos, Drew.

Brandon Jennings.Not a great shooting night for Jennings, but more importantly it was an aggressive Jennings who led the Bucks in scoring and dishing while also adding five rebounds and turning it over just once. Jennings gave the Bucks a spark midway through the third with a pair of driving layups and a long three, and he added another quick five points when he returned early in the fourth. But his legs looked tired down the stretch, missing five straight to close regulation.

Defensively, Jennings looked a bit more eager in the early going against Sessions (4/16 fg, 12 pts, 16 ast, 5 to) but had a couple breakdowns marking Gibson late in the game. Perhaps a bit understandable given the importance of riding Gibson off the three point line, but still. In discussing Jennings' behavior against Phoenix earlier this week on WSSP, Boylan brought up the need for improved defensive efforts from the team's point guards, which seemed like a strong hint at Jennings' inconsistencies on that end thus far this season.

Shaun Livingston. Claiming a starting spot hasn't translated into many late-game opportunities for Livingston, but Boylan rode him in the fourth quarter and OT and was repaid for his faith with 13 points down the stretch. Two backdoor cuts led to Livingston dunks early in the fourth, and he kept it going with his customary assortment of drives and pull-ups from mid-range.

Three Numbers

65% / 37%. The Bucks couldn't contain the Cavs in the first half, surrendering a blistering 65% shooting while making just 37% of their own attempts from the field. Thankfully, an 8-0 edge on the offensive boards kept the Bucks in it long enough for the Cavs to cool off from the field.

36. The bench scored 36 of the Bucks' 53 first half points, helping Milwaukee overcome deficits in both the first and fourth quarters.

16. The Bucks were rewarded for going under screens and containing Sessions' scoring (4/16 fg, 12 pts, 5 to), but he was still a handful as a creator, netting 16 of Cleveland's 33 dimes on the night.

Three Good

The Old Brandon. Well, maybe we should say the new old Brandon. Despite his poor shooting line and difficult finish (1/8 fg to close the game), Jennings finally seemed to have his confidence back--and if we know anything about Jennings, it's that he's not much without his swagger. He also moved to diffuse some of the chatter that followed from his curiously timed "I'm keeping my options open" remarks the previous day (h/t CanadaBucks).

"It's nothing to be worried about," said Jennings, who is under contract through next season. "It kind of got blown out of proportion a little bit. I never said I was leaving. After being in this a couple years, I understand the business of basketball.

"I'm still going to be here playing hard every night and my focus is to get into the playoffs."

Alright Brandon, you've said your piece. Now let's move on.

Living Good. Drew Gooden's entire basketball existence is a double-edged sword, but there's no denying the big plays he made on both ends late in the game. Not to be outdone, Livingston also saved his best for crunch time, proving he's just as capable late as he is early. How about seeing more of that?

Bench. The Bucks' reserves outscored their Cleveland counterparts 45-30 and were essential to helping the Bucks' erase an early double-digit deficit. Though Boylan mostly went with the Bucks' starters down the stretch, Jackson was again involved early and often (10 pts, 4 reb, 5 ast) while Dunleavy and Ilyasova each added 12 points and six rebounds.

And how about Boylan himself? The Bucks trailed 83-73 when Skiles was tossed late in the third, but Boylan quickly found some lineups that worked and earned a crucial win in the process.

Three Bad

Energy deficit. With Bogut on the shelf and the undersized/spatially-challenged Gooden in the pivot, we know the Bucks will often struggle to contain opponents defensively, but that doesn't make it any less troubling to see the Bucks so frequently come out looking flat and uninspired to start games.

No rookies. Given the end result, I can't say I'm that broken up about Jon Leuer (five points in six minutes) and Tobias Harris (DNP-CD) playing sparingly, but my official stance remains that the Bucks would be well-served to more regularly see what both can bring to the rotation.

Windy City North. As of today, the Bucks would face the Bulls in the first round of the playoffs. And considering what happened at the BC the last time Chicago "visited," that's not a scenario I'm particularly eager to see play out.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Who caresss

Jennings is goneee to hell with lifeeee.

Just kidding great win. Ill let future Collin deal with the pain of Jennings leaving/not leaving.

by Collin B on Feb 11, 2012 1:16 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

Tonight's win demonstrated..

…that if the team goes to work with a fairly workmanlike attitude, without their bloomers all bunched up, they’ll win some games — because that’s what happens in the. NBA. The Cavs gave us chances. We fumbled some, converted others. Like a middling team on a decent night will.

I’m not damning with faint praise. I’m calling it a “nice” win that likely doesn’t by itself change much.

by unklchuk on Feb 11, 2012 2:12 AM CST via Android app reply actions  

Officiating

Was it just me or were they letting them play last night? I mean , both sides were gettin beatin up inside. I felt the Bucks shouldve gotten to the foul line more often than they did last night…..Refs werent too good last night..

by Somphud Manyvong on Feb 11, 2012 7:50 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah, it was pretty fun to watch

I was amazed how many point blank shots the Bucks were able to defend given they were missing both Bogut and Sanders…which also made that call on Gooden at the end of regulation all the more surprising.

by Frank Madden on Feb 11, 2012 10:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Just because there hasn't been enough about this

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ball-dont-lie/brandon-jennings-states-obvious-regarding-2014-free-agency-170149501.html

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Feb 11, 2012 9:28 AM CST reply actions  

I DIDN'T GO NUTS YOU GUYS BUT SRSLY ITS TEH WORST THING EVAR

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Feb 11, 2012 9:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Kareem leaving might have actually helped the team long-term

I’m sure we can survive a middle-of-the-pack PG(albeit with lots of bravado)leaving. Just don’t get LeBronned, TPE ftl.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Feb 11, 2012 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

I SHOULD USE CAPS!

IT’LL SHOW HOW BIG MY HEART IS. MAKE MY MESSAGE MORE IMPORTANT. ATTRACT FOLLOWERS. THANKS FOR THE DEMO!

by unklchuk on Feb 11, 2012 10:19 AM CST via Android app up reply actions   1 recs

Use italics...

it will confuse everyone.

...BRANDONJENNINGSSUX!!!

by TwoShoesMcGooze on Feb 11, 2012 10:20 AM CST up reply actions  

oops. I furgpt 2 uz deviant speling.

plz b payshunt wid mee…

by unklchuk on Feb 11, 2012 10:24 AM CST via Android app up reply actions  

try l33t 5p311ing

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Feb 11, 2012 11:58 AM CST up reply actions  

I grow slightly weary of being stupider than you.

l33t 5p311ing might on a different planet mean “hate spelling” but that’s a guess without any support. Is there a Canadian dialect involved?

Or are you simply talking like a teenager? The statute of limitations has expired on my teen years.

by unklchuk on Feb 11, 2012 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I haven't been a teen since

Jimmy Carter but it’s leet spelling and yes young teens use it. Canadian dialect is the Queen’s English don’t you know…other than Newfie

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Feb 11, 2012 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Stupider than me? I don't think so Chuk

I have teenagers so that may put me at an advantage

Read if you desire

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Feb 11, 2012 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

lol font-play

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Feb 11, 2012 10:37 AM CST up reply actions  

He's off the hook for now ;)

Although, given the recent history of NBA players who have “done their homework on big market teams” I don’t think it was unreasonable to be suspicious.

by Jacob Grinyer on Feb 11, 2012 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Broussard

I’m pretty sure the question was directed at big markets as well. Something to the effect of

“Have you put any consideration into leaving Milwaukee for a bigger market?”

Then Jennings says that he’s doing his" homework on bigger markets." These analysts are sneaky. They know how to pry out the answer they want.

by FearTheDeer on Feb 11, 2012 12:07 PM CST up reply actions  

And also after a conversation that didn't get mentioned about

how he thought playing in a smaller market hurt his all-star bid and how playing in a bigger market netted larger endorsement contracts, etc. Then pops that question and Brandon says that.

That’s why I don’t like most ESPN or official NBA analysts, they clown Milwaukee. The only opinions on either network with regards to Milwaukee that I respect is Sam Mitchell and Fratello. The rest lost me with a slick joke at some point.

by FearTheDeer on Feb 11, 2012 12:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I read a larger Jennings excerpt from that interview. (Forget where.) Jennings didn’t seem out of line, and I didn’t hear a ticking time bomb.

Jennings has taken flak for mentioning himself in the same breath as the NBA’s younger stars (‘cuz he ain’t one of them, at least not yet). But I interpreted that as him looking at possible role models and trying to be “professional” like he thinks they are being professional. I’d guess his motivation was something like: “I’m not going to be dumb about this. I’m going to study it and be smart about my career.”

That doesn’t trouble me. And if Jackson helped him see things that way and make that resolve, I don’t have a problem with that either.

by unklchuk on Feb 11, 2012 12:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Broussard is buddies with Jennings

I doubt he conned Brandon into saying anything…heck, it was over email. Not like he cornered him after the game and asked him something he wasn’t ready for.

But in general I agree that there wasn’t anything particularly explosive in what he actually said—it’s just the timing and way it was delivered (via a player mouthpiece like Broussard) that makes you really wonder. Just not something that needs to be brought up in the same week that he basically moped his way through the Suns/Raps games.

by Frank Madden on Feb 11, 2012 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Conning?

Buddies? I don’t know what that means, buddies as in FeartheDeer is buddies with Frank Madden? or buddies as in Broussard attended Ballers, Bottles, and Models with Jennings and Cap Jack?

What I do know is that Broussard asked Jennings about free agency approximately 2 and a half years prematurely. I haven’t heard that question asked of other successful rookies of the rookie class of 2009. I wonder if Tyreke, Curry, DeRozan, and others have had similar interviews at this point. I’m curious what movitated Broussard to interview Jennings at all quite honestly. The article didn’t appear to be about the issues within the Bucks organization much nor Jennings All-Star snubbing

by FearTheDeer on Feb 11, 2012 1:25 PM CST up reply actions  

When I re-read that I didn't mean it to be offensive

I was just saying there are different levels of buddies and different types of buddies have different types of relationships. The guys on here are probably the best Bucks buddies I’ve got.

by FearTheDeer on Feb 11, 2012 1:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I would be your buddy

but then I’d have to go to Ballers, Bottles, and Models with Cap’n Jack.

Wait, that’s what happened, right?

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Feb 11, 2012 2:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Second article botched.

If he’s restricted in 2013, he’ll get more than one year.

Mistakenly posted on Jennings blog because of losing this page when closing that window.

by toasterrebound on Feb 11, 2012 4:32 PM CST up reply actions  

As Auntie May said "I believe there is a hero in all of us that keeps us honest gives us strength and makes us noble"

The Jennning saga will play out in it’s entirety next season. Depending on how the parties involved chooses to act (honestly and nobly) we can be looking at a few different scenarios.

1. D-WIll/Sloan- Jennings/Skiles devolves into the dreaded coach v superstar drama and we lose both our head coach and star pg in spiral of heresy during a season that seals the fate of the franchise as it prepares to relocate.

2. CP3- Brandon is traded his summer/early next season and the Bucks receive adequate pieces in exchange for him (an expiring contract of a Gasol-type and some draft picks). No hard feelings are had and we stay in the realm of mediocrity.

3. Nash- Jennings stays. We continue to work to build our team around the dynamic PG and hope that consistent playoff contention (not necessarily success) keeps Milwaukee relevant enough to be talked about nationally while filling the seats in the Bradley Center.

by Charlie_Buckets on Feb 11, 2012 1:47 PM CST reply actions  

So there's going to be a "Free Brandon Jennings" movement in 10 years?

http://twitter.com/WhalesLarry ...but only if you want to see someone still trying to figure Twitter out.

by Mitchell Maurer on Feb 11, 2012 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Think he's got to get a little better first

Then we’ll see, nice to see him shooting more last night, needs to make a few more too though. The eight assists helps.

"He always plays like he's a pit bull that hasn't been fed in about a year and that you've got pork chops in your pockets and that's the basketball." Of course, he's Canadian

by CanadaBucks on Feb 11, 2012 3:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it's best not to overreact with this

Let the market decide what he’s worth, and then make a decision on whether to match or not. Definitely don’t overpay, or bid against ourselves just to avoid upsetting BJ. He has said this is about the business of basketball, he now has to accept if the bucks play it the same way.

Discussing it even between now and then is really just a waste of everyones time.

After some doubts I have been impressed by his play recently. But I still don’t think he’s worth a huge amount of stress. I think franchises should be more willing to let stars with big egos walk. Do you think Denver regrets Carmelo leaving? I also imagine a lot of Orlando people will be happy to see Dwight Howard go in the end, rather than having to deal with his theatrics.

by Bucksnorge on Feb 11, 2012 3:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Milwaukee Bucks.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
NBA Draft Big Board (15+)
Whammyfy2_small
State of the Milwaukee Bucks
Lanier1_small
The Canada Bucks Big Board 2012
Small
Bucks... Looking Ahead To 2013..
Lanier1_small
Canada Bucks Mock Draft 2012 v2.01
Small
Skiles and Team Chemistry
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Two Recent Story Links
Clemson-38-va-tech-10_small
All In On The 8th; Plus Draft Stuff, And John Salmons
Jenkins_fearless_1280x1024_small
Ekpe Udoh
Lanier1_small
The CB 2012 Mock Draft 1-14 First Edition

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Frank_small Frank Madden

Capture_small Alex Boeder

Editors

Milwaukee_bucks_modern_logo_small Dan Sinclair

Bruv__316x634___316x634___316x634__small Steve von Horn

Authors

Rubberducky_small Mitchell Maurer

Front_small Jacob Grinyer